Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Jul 6;3(8):613–620. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00196-4

TABLE 3.

Crude and adjusted HRs and ORs associated with baseline serum CC16 for incident airflow limitation in TESAOD (Table 3a) and in the replication population of ECRHS-Sp (Table 3b). The highest CC16 tertile is the reference group.

a Hazard Ratios for incident airflow limitation N subjects who developed airflow limitation/total N subjects (251/958)ˆ Hazard Ratios for incident stage 2 airflow limitation N subjects who developed stage 2 airflow limitation/total N subjects (106/958)ˆ

Crude HR (95% CI)
P value
Adj* HR (95% CI)
P value
Adj** HR (95% CI)
P value
Crude HR (95% CI)
P value
Adj* HR (95% CI)
P value
Adj** HR (95% CI)
P value
Effect associated with baseline CC16 tertiles
HIGH 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
MEDIUM 1.09 (0.79 – 1.49)
p = 0.613
1.17 (0.86 – 1.60)
p = 0.325
1.15 (0.84 – 1.57)
p = 0.376
1.53 (0.89 – 2.60)
p = 0.121
1.65 (0.97 – 2.82)
p = 0.067
1.71 (1.00 – 2.93)
p = 0.051
LOW 1.45 (1.07 – 1.96)
p = 0.017
1.15 (0.84 – 1.58)
p = 0.387
1.10 (0.79 – 1.51)
p = 0.573
2.36 (1.44 – 3.88)
p = 0.0007
1.82 (1.08 – 3.07)
p = 0.024
1.81 (1.06 – 3.09)
p = 0.029
P value for trend 0.017 0.403 0.596 0.0005 0.026 0.032

Effect associated with 1-SD decrease in CC16 1.17 (1.02 – 1.33)
p = 0.022
1.09 (0.93 – 1.27)
p = 0.284
1.06 (0.91 – 1.23)
p = 0.458
1.37 (1.16 – 1.61)
p = 0.0002
1.29 (1.04 – 1.59)
p = 0.019
1.27 (1.03 – 1.56)
p = 0.026

Harrell’s C statistics (model with CC16 tertiles) 0.55 0.73 0.81 0.60 0.79 0.83
b Odds Ratios for incident airflow limitation N subjects who developed airflow limitation/total N subjects (70/495)ˆ Odds Ratios for incident stage 2 airflow limitation N subjects who developed stage 2 airflow limitation/total N subjects (28/495)ˆ

Crude OR (95% CI)
P value
Adj* OR (95% CI)
P value
Adj** OR (95% CI)
P value
Crude OR (95% CI)
P value
Adj* OR (95% CI)
P value
Adj** OR (95% CI)
P value
Effect associated with baseline CC16 tertiles
HIGH 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
MEDIUM 1.53 (0.76 – 3.06)
p = 0.232
1.47 (0.72 – 3.02)
p = 0.289
1.37 (0.56 – 3.36)
p = 0.488
2.04 (0.60 – 6.91)
p = 0.253
1.89 (0.53 – 6.66)
p = 0.324
1.80 (0.46 – 7.02)
p = 0.397
LOW 2.41 (1.25 – 4.64)
p = 0.0083
2.14 (1.06 – 4.30)
p = 0.033
2.12 (0.89 – 5.05)
p = 0.091
4.18 (1.37 – 12.8)
p = 0.012
3.35 (1.02 – 10.9)
p = 0.045
3.06 (0.84 – 11.2)
p = 0.090
P value for trend 0.0070 0.032 0.085 0.0072 0.036 0.079

Effect associated with 1-SD decrease in CC16 1.47 (1.17 – 1.85)
p = 0.0011
1.39 (1.08 – 1.80)
p = 0.012
1.38 (1.00 – 1.92)
p = 0.051
1.75 (1.27 – 2.40)
p = 0.0005
1.64 (1.13 – 2.40)
p = 0.010
1.53 (1.00 – 2.34)
p = 0.049

AUC (model with CC16 tertiles) 0.60 0.70 0.92 0.65 0.81 0.91
*

adjusted for sex, age, smoking status and intensity, pack-years, and asthma at baseline

**

adjusted for sex, age, smoking status and intensity, pack-years, asthma, and FEV1/FVC at baseline. These covariates were included because they are known to affect the risk for COPD.

ˆ

Of the 960 TESAOD participants, 2 had missing smoking or asthma information and were excluded from analyses

*

adjusted for center, sample type (random versus enriched), sex, age, smoking status and intensity, pack-years, and asthma at baseline

**

adjusted for center, sample type (random versus enriched), sex, age, smoking status and intensity, pack-years, asthma, and FEV1/FVC at baseline

ˆ

Of the 514 ECRHS-Sp participants, 19 had missing smoking status and/or intensity information and were excluded from analyses