Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2015 Jul 26;81:300–305. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.07.033

Table 2.

Results from mixed models comparing µCT to DTS and HRCT topography measurements at inferior endplates. The symbol ∪ indicates that the depth measurements from AP and LM views were pooled before calculation of the distribution statistics. The symbol ā indicates that the distribution statistics from AP and LM views were averaged. For ease of comparison with DTS/HRCT averages, µCT averages are presented below each parameter in parentheses.

µCT.Av
(Av=2.96)
µCT.SD
(Av=1.89)
µCT.Sk
(Av=−0.66)
µCT.Ku
(Av=2.23)
DTS.AP Av 2.18 0.88 0.18 0.68
R2Adj 0.14
Slope 0.651
psl <0.0001 NS NS NS
Intercept 1.624
pint <0.0001

DTS.LM Av 2.32 0.93 −0.15 0.15
R2Adj 0.47 0.30
Slope 0.892 0.546
psl <0.0001 <0.03 NS NS
Intercept 0.921 1.410
pint <0.0004 <0.0001

DTS.AP∪LM Av 2.24 0.99 0.18 0.31
R2Adj 0.32 0.35
Slope 1.112 0.925
psl <0.0001 <0.0001 NS NS
Intercept 0.525 0.986
pint >0.09 <0.0002

DTS.APāLM Av 2.25 0.90 0.01 0.41
R2Adj 0.34 0.28
Slope 1.120 0.611
psl <0.0001 <0.04 NS NS
Intercept 0.496 1.366
pint >0.10 <0.0001

HRCT Av 2.35 0.73 −0.54 1.13
R2Adj 0.51 0.23
Slope 0.636 −0.273
psl <0.0001 NS <0.02 NS
Intercept 1.502 −0.789
pint <0.0001 <0.0001