Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 27;30(Suppl 1):S59–S66. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.S1.S59

Table 3. Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) treatment strategies according to the birthweight group.

Treatment Birthweight (g) Total
(n = 2,254)
<750
(n=379)
750-999
(n=511)
1,000-1,249
(n=593)
1,250-1,499
(n=771)
No PDA group 101
(26.6%)
181
(35.4%)
322
(54.3%)
602
(78.1%)
1,206
(53.5%)
PDA group 278
(73.4%)
330
(64.6%)
271
(45.7%)
169
(21.9%)
1,048
(46.5%)
 PT group 20
(5.3%)
16
(3.1%)
21
(3.5%)
12
(1.6%)
69
(3.1%)
 PST group 41
(10.8%)
75
(14.7%)
55
(9.3%)
41
(5.3%)
212
(9.4%)
 ST group 138
(36.4%)
190
(37.2%)
165
(27.8%)
103
(13.3%)
596
(26.4%)
 CT group 79
(20.9%)
49
(9.6%)
30
(5.1%)
13
(1.7%)
171
(7.6%)

*In multinomial logit model, the odds ratio (OR) of the ratio of CT vs. PT was 3.6 (95% CI 1.45-9.17), OR of the ratio of CT vs. PST was 9.2 (95% CI 2.93-12.66), and the OR of the ratio of CT vs. ST was 4.5 (95% CI 2.39-8.62) in birthweight <750 g group when compared with birthweight 1,250-1,499 g group. P<0.001 in 4 PDA treatment subgroups according to the birthweight by chi-square test. PT, prophylactic treatment; PST, pre-symptomatic treatment; ST, symptomatic treatment; CT, conservative treatment without any intervention; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; OR, odds ratio.