Table 6.

Effect Size and 95% Confidence Intervals for the Comparison Between the Ankle-Sprain–Coper and Healthy Control Groups

Study	Patient-Reported Outcome	Hedges g	95% Confidence Interval
Croy et al,36 2012	FAAMa	−0.24	(−0.87, 0.38)
Plante and Wikstrom,45 2013	FAAMb	0.43	(−0.20, 1.05)
Wright et al,56 2013	FAAMc	0.25	(−0.33, 0.83)
Wikstrom et al,54 2009	Foot and Ankle Disability Indexd	0.42	(−0.15, 0.99)
Croy et al,36 2012	FAAM-Sporte	0.64	(0.00, 1.27)
Plante and Wikstrom,45 2013	FAAM-Sportf	0.73	(0.09, 1.36)
Wright et al,56 2013	FAAM-Sportg	−0.13	(−0.70, 0.45)
Wikstrom et al,54 2009	FAAM-Sporth	0.27	(−0.29, 0.83)
Wikstrom et al,54 2009	Self-Report Questionnaire of Ankle Functioni	0.55	(−0.02, 1.13)

Abbreviations: FAAM, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure; FAAM-Sport, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Sport.

^a–i Corresponds with lettering in Figure 4.