Skip to main content
letter
. 2015 Nov 9;10:10.3402/ljm.v10.30001. doi: 10.3402/ljm.v10.30001

Table 1.

Study designs and characteristics of included subjects in published studies aiming to evaluate the effects of narghile use on periodontal health (clinical, radiological, and microbiological studies)

First author Baljoon (16) Natto (17) Natto (18) Natto (19) Natto (20) Bibars (21)
Town (country) Jeddah (Saudi Arabia) Jeddah (Saudi Arabia) Jeddah (Saudi Arabia) Jeddah (Saudi Arabia) Jeddah (Saudi Arabia) Irbid (Jordan)
Study design Cross-sectional
Comparative
Cross-sectional
Comparative
Cross-sectional
Comparative
Cross-sectional
Comparative
Cross-sectional
Comparative
Cross-sectional
Comparative
Recruitment method Announcements/newspaper Announcements/newspaper Announcements/newspaper Announcements/newspaper Announcements/newspaper Flyers (cafés; restaurants and university campus)
Name of the smoking mode Water-pipe Water-pipe Water-pipe Water-pipe Water-pipe Waterpipe
Inclusion criteria >20 teeth ≥25 Y >20 teeth >20 teeth >20 teeth NR
Non-inclusion criteria Pregnancy
Unhealthy
NR Pregnancy
Unhealthy
Pregnancy
Unhealthy
Pregnancy Unhealthy Chronic systemic diseases
Endocrine or hematological pathologies
Pregnancy Dental scaling within the last 6 months
Orthodontic appliance
Exclusive-NS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Calculated sample size No No No No No No
Number 117 76 80 117 58 72
Age (Y) 39 (37–41)a
17–60b
39.4c
25–70b
17–60b
M: 38 (36–41)a
F: 39 (34–44)a
TS: 38.5c
17–60b
M: 39 (37–41)a
F: 38 (34–43)a
39 (36–41)a 27±9d*
18–60b
Number of years of smoking NR NR NR NR NR NR
Type of tobacco NR NR NR NR NR NR
Method of narghile-use quantification RY NR RY RY NR NW
Quantity of used tobacco 57 (48–66)a RY
44%: <40 RY
56%: ≥40 RY
NR 36 (27–44)a RY
40%: <27 RY
60%: ≥27 RY
57 (48–66)a RY
44%: <40 RY
56%: ≥40 RY
NR 3.4c NW
Last narghile (h) NR NR NR NR NR NR
Explorations Clinical examination (four sites [buccal, mesial, distal, lingual] for all the teeth)
Radiographic examination
Clinical examination Radiographic examination Clinical examination
(four sites [buccal, mesial, distal, lingual] for all the teeth)
Clinical examination (four sites [buccal, mesial, distal, lingual] for all the teeth)
Radiographic examination
Clinical examination
Bacteriological study
Clinical examination (four sites [buccal, mesial, distal, lingual] for 6 teeth)
Questionnaires Standardized Standardized Standardized Standardized Standardized Non-standardized
Comparison with active CS n=72
37 (35–39)a Y
230 (193–268)a CY
37 subjects: <170 CY
52 subjects: ≥170 CY
n=49
36.7c Y
25–70b
n=50
36.5c Y
210 (169–251)a CY
n=72
M: 36 (34–38)a Y F: 38 (34–43)a Y
230 (193–268)a CY
37 subjects: <170 CY
52 subjects: ≥170 CY
n=35
37 (34–40)a Y
n=30
34±10d Y
14.1c CD
Comparison with healthy non-S n=99 n=70
34.4c Y
25–70b
n=78
33.2c
n=99
M: 38 (35–41)a
F: 35 (32–39)a
n=80
40 (35–41)a Y
n=38
32±11d Y
Comparison with MS n=67
33 (31–35)a Y
174 (141–207)a CY
24 (18–30)a RY
n=49
38.1c Y
25–70b Y
n=54
37.1c Y
1.91 (154–229)a CY
17 (10–6)a RY
n=67
M: 33 (31–35)a Y
F: 32 (28–37)a Y
174 (141–207)a CY
24 (18–30)a RY
n=25
33 (30–37)a Y
n=50
28±10d Y
1.9c NW
10.6c CD
Main results VD prevalence and severity are greater in NS and CS than in non-S Similar associations of VD with narghile or cigarette smoking Narghile use exerts a negative impact on the periodontal bone Gingival health is compromised by narghile use Association between narghile use and PD manifestations Narghile use is associated with PBH reduction No major differences were observed between CS, NS, and non-S regarding the occurrence of PM NS were significantly more likely to have PD

CD, cigarette/day; CS, cigarette smokers; CY, cigarette-years; F, female; M, male; NS, narghile smokers; non-S, non-smokers; NR, not reported; NW, narghile/week; PBH, periodontal bone height; PD, periodontal disease; PM, periodontal microflora; RY, run-years; VD, vertical defect; Y, years.

a

Data are mean (95% confidence interval);

b

data are range (minimum–maximum);

c

data are mean;

d

data are mean±SD.

Significant differences:

*

NS vs. CS;

NS vs. MS. No significant difference was found between NS vs. non-S.