Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 12;6:1240. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01240

Table 4.

Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. identified by disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods.

Antimicrobial agent Disk diffusion Broth microdilution Agreement between methods
No. of isolates % of resistant isolates No. of isolates % of resistant isolates
S I R S I R Correlation coefficient Kappa values
AMINOGLYCOSIDES
Gentamicin 65 44 2 1.80% 54 43 14 12.61% 0.0043 0.226
Streptomycin 9 29 73 65.77% 7 21 83 74.77% 0.5671 0.898
β- LACTAM
Ampicillin 13 20 78 70.27% 10 17 84 75.68% 0.7390 0.997
MACROLIDES
Azithromycin 48 48 15 13.51%
Erythromycin 27 38 46 41.44% 28 29 54 48.65% 0.4196 0.695
Tylosin 7 61 43 38.74%
QUINOLONES
Ciprofloxacin 62 33 16 14.41% 78 25 8 7.21% 0.3596 0.739
Nalidixic acid 40 27 44 39.64%
PHENICOL
Chloromphenicol 77 29 5 4.50%
TETRACYCLINE
Tetracycline 48 42 21 18.92% 33 56 22 19.82% 0.8566 0.999

S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistance. MIC and zone of inhibition breakpoints are listed in Kashoma et al. (2015).