Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2015 May 1;54(18):2874–2884. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00171

Table 1.

Bond distances (in Angstroms) for various Cys-bound CDO species as obtained by X-ray crystallography (4JTO) or whole-protein QM/MM optimizations (all other models listed), where X refers to the ligating atom of the sixth ligand present at the Fe center (where applicable). For the analogous Sec-bound analogues, see Table S3 of the Supporting Information

Species Fe-NH86 Fe-NH88 Fe-NH140 Fe-SCys Fe-NCys Fe-X Cys-R60, 1 Cys-R60, 2 Cys-Y157
4JTO, WT (Cys)-Fe(II)CDOa 1.893 2.199 2.110 2.291 2.262 N/A N/A N/A N/A
WT (Cys)-Fe(II)CDO 2.153 2.184 2.177 2.368 2.250 N/A 1.800 2.014 1.537
H155A (Cys)-Fe(II)CDO 2.158 2.198 2.172 2.372 2.256 N/A 1.717 2.134 1.552
H155A (H2O/Cys)-Fe(II)CDO 2.205 2.273 2.142 2.521 2.278 2.311 1.734 2.188 1.552
WT (OH/Cys)-Fe(III)CDO 2.326 2.299 2.111 2.445 2.223 1.880 1.984 1.791 1.532
H155A (OH/Cys)-Fe(III)CDO 2.328 2.287 2.116 2.428 2.237 1.872 2.110 1.717 1.549
WT (NO/Cys)-Fe(II)CDO 2.113 2.110 2.013 2.369 2.115 1.769 1.772 2.008 1.529
H155A (NO/Cys)-Fe(II)CDO 2.145 2.160 2.026 2.339 2.083 1.776 1.707 2.163 1.535
a

Crystal structure at 2.00 Å resolution, from Ref 14.