Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 7;17(10):e228. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4941

Table 4.

Evaluation of the 7 Web-based computer-tailored interventions by different educational levels.

Study and groupa Level of education, mean (SD) F (df1,df2) P Tukey HSD, P

Low Middle High

L-Mb L-H M-H
AEL








T0









Sequential 11.20 (3.48) 11.12 (3.00) 10.72 (3.62) 0.71 (2,340) .56 .97 .47 .70


Simultaneously 11.75 (3.37) 11.49 (2.85) 10.40 (3.61) 5.97 (2,376) .003 .82 .002 .05

T2









Sequential 11.32 (4.27) 11.27 (3.69) 10.39 (4.33) 0.58 (2,229) .56 .77 .89 .53


Simultaneously 11.09 (4.28) 11.53 (3.30) 10.81 (3.89) 1.26 (2,246) .56 .99 .29 .48
MHB








T1









Sequential 7.43 (1.08) 7.14 (1.79) 7.03 (1.13) 2.12 (2,201) .12 .98 .48 .11


Simultaneously 7.80 (0.91) 6.94 (1.70) 6.56 (2.41) 1.30 (2,178) .27 .60 .27 .62

T2









Sequential 7.78 (1.27) 7.59 (0.94) 7.53 (0.91) 1.04 (2,367) .35 .64 .37 .71


Simultaneously 7.94 (0.89) 7.68 (0.92) 7.43 (1.02) 5.52 (2,359) .004 .30 .01 .05
MYB








T1









Intervention 7.07 (1.50) 6.93 (1.23) 6.60 (1.77) 3.17 (2,317) .04 .77 .05 .17
PAS








T3









Tailoring only 6.09 (1.70) 6.72 (1.25) 7.03 (1.20) 2.42 (2,81) .09 .92 .96 .63
STQ








T2









Video 6.48 (1.97) 6.18 (2.17) 6.28 (1.64) 0.38 (2,193) .69 .67 .83 .95


Text 6.53 (1.84) 6.51 (1.23) 5.96 (1.72) 3.29 (2,234) .04 .99 .08 .07
SQ4U








T1









Action Plan 6.56 (1.74) 6.63 (1.41) 6.20 (1.60) 1.29 (2,134) .28 .98 .79 .25


Action Plan+ 6.27 (2.10) 6.49 (1.69) 6.51 (1.27) 0.10 (2,108) .90 .97 .85 .99
WIB








T1









Video 6.99 (1.23) 7.56 (0.78) 7.36 (1.08) 3.17 (2,37) .05 .05 .27 .21


Text 6.79 (0.92) 7.32 (0.82) 7.11 (1.24) 0.66 (2,51) .52 .49 .67 .88

a T specifies the time of the evaluation measurement.

b Level of education: L=low, M=middle, H=high.