Table 2.
Summarized results of stability of improvement in Study 1 in Group A follow-up vs. post-training comparisons.
| Group A |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Post- M (SD) | Follow-up M (SD) | Z | p | |||
| TIP | ATOT | 6 | 68 (34) | 83 (26) | -1.153 | ns. | |
| Language | Token Test | 10 | 32.2 (30) | 26.4 (26) | -1.183 | ns. | |
| PDPseudo | 10 | 12.1 (9.9) | 10.9 (8.9) | -1.245 | ns. | ||
| PDWords | 10 | 7.5 (16.3) | 7.5 (11.7) | -0.282 | ns. | ||
| ComprVC | 4 | 22.5 (25) | 20 (0) | c | |||
| Other cognitive functions | |||||||
| Working memory | SSP | 7 | 4.8 (0.6) | 5 (0.5) | -1.000 | ns. | |
| SWM | 9 | 39.1 (20.5) | 41 (14.8) | -0.178 | ns. | ||
As in the follow-up assessment some patients did not perform the full set of tasks, the number of tested participants is given at each task. c, statistical analysis was not performed because of insufficient number of subjects. Values of ATOT are provided by ms; Token Test, PDPseudo, PDWords and ComprVC by % of errors; SSP and SWM by total score.