Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 10;6(6):803–819. doi: 10.3945/an.115.009647

TABLE 4.

Studies reporting on the association between anthropometric factors and breast cancer risk in Latin America1

Premenopausal
Postmenopausal
First author, year (ref) Age, y Study design Country of origin Contrast Cases/noncases, n Risk estimate* 95% CI Cases/noncases, n Risk estimate 95% CI
Recent BMI
 Amadou, 2014 (81) 35–69 PCC Mexico ≥30 vs. <25 kg/m2 415/476 0.48 0.32, 0.72 583/598 0.75 0.51, 1.12
 Ronco, 2012 (82) 23–69 HCC Uruguay Obese vs. nonobese 165/261 0.77 0.48, 1.25
WHR, WC
 Amadou 2014 (81) 35–69 PCC Mexico WHR: ≥0.93 vs. <0.85 415/476 0.712 0.49, 1.03 583/598 0.562 0.38, 0.82
WC: ≥103 vs. <93 cm 0.45 0.27, 0.74 0.62 0.40, 0.95
Change in body shape
 Amadou, 2014 (81) 35–69 PCC Mexico Trajectory3 415/476 583/598
 Gr2 vs. Gr1 1.31 0.83, 2.08 1.55 1.05, 2.20
 Gr3 vs. Gr1 1.28 0.76, 2.14 1.71 1.10, 2.67
 Gr4 vs. Gr1 1.65 0.98, 2.75 1.46 0.93, 2.29
 Gr5 vs. Gr1 0.83 0.30, 2.28 2.20 0.98, 4.94
1

Gr, group; HCC, hospital-based case-control study; PCC, population-based case-control study; ref, reference; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.

2

Further adjusted for recent BMI.

3

Trajectory of body shape throughout life: Gr1, constantly low; Gr2, constantly midrange; Gr3, moderate increase; Gr4, sharp increase; Gr5, constantly high.