Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 15;373(16):1519–1530. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500409

Table 2.

Risk Ratios for Colorectal Adenoma Outcomes According to Treatment Assignment.*

Treatment Assignment One or More Adenomas One or More Advanced Adenomas
No. of Patients/
Total No. (%)
Risk Ratio
(95% CI)§
No. of Patients/
Total No. (%)
Risk Ratio
(95% CI)§
Vitamin D vs. no vitamin D
    No vitamin D 442/1035 (42.7) Reference 98/1042 (9.4) Reference
    Vitamin D 438/1024 (42.8) 0.99 (0.89–1.09) 98/1032 (9.5) 0.99 (0.75–1.29)
Calcium vs. no calcium
    No calcium 362/761 (47.6) Reference 77/764 (10.1) Reference
    Calcium 345/762 (45.3) 0.95 (0.85–1.06) 81/773 (10.5) 1.02 (0.76–1.38)
Calcium plus vitamin D vs. calcium
alone
    Calcium 259/655 (39.5) Reference 63/662 (9.5) Reference
    Calcium plus vitamin D 259/643 (40.3) 1.01 (0.88–1.15) 56/648 (8.6) 0.89 (0.63–1.26)
Calcium plus vitamin D vs. neither
agent
    Neither calcium nor vitamin D 183/380 (48.2) Reference 35/380 (9.2) Reference
    Calcium plus vitamin D 174/381 (45.7) 0.93 (0.80–1.08) 37/387 (9.6) 0.99 (0.63–1.56)
*

The analyses of vitamin D versus no vitamin D included all participants who underwent randomization. The analyses of calcium versus no calcium and of vitamin D plus calcium versus neither agent were restricted to participants who underwent full factorial randomization. The analyses of vitamin D plus calcium versus calcium did not include participants who underwent full factorial randomization and were assigned to receive placebo or vitamin D alone.

P values, calculated with the use of a chi-square contingency-table test, are as follows: vitamin D versus no vitamin D, P = 0.98; calcium versus no calcium, P = 0.37; vitamin D plus calcium versus calcium, P = 0.79; and vitamin D plus calcium versus neither agent, P = 0.49.

Denominators differ between adenomas and advanced adenomas because of missing data for lesion size and an assumption that small lesions (<6 mm) with missing pathological data are not advanced adenomas (see the Supplementary Appendix).

§

Risk ratios were adjusted for age, clinical center, anticipated surveillance interval (3 or 5 years), a three-level variable for sex and type of randomization (male, female and two-group randomization, female and full factorial randomization), and number of baseline adenomas (1, 2, or ≥3).