Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 21;71(12):1477–1484. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1935-7

Table 2.

Patient characteristics

Characteristic Efficacy cohort
(N = 336)
Toxicity cohort
(N = 374)
Age
 Median 61 61
 Percentiles (25th, 75th) 55, 69 54, 68
BSA
 Median 1.98 1.96
 Percentiles (25th, 75th) 1.82, 2.13 1.82, 2.12
Race
 White 324 (96 %) 358 (96 %)
 Asian 3 (0.89 %) 3 (0.80 %)
 Black 5 (1.5 %) 8 (2.1 %)
 Arabian 3 (0.89 %) 4 (1.0 %)
 Latin American 1 (0.30 %) 1 (0.27 %)
Gender
 Male 229 (68 %) 258 (69 %)
 Female 107 (32 %) 116 (31 %)
Clinical response
 PR + CR 143 (43 %) 149 (40 %)
 SD 130 (39 %) 149 (40 %)
 PD 43 (13 %) 55 (15 %)
 Unknown 20 (6.0 %) 21 (5.6 %)
Heng prognostic risk groupa
 Good (0 risk factor) 64 (19 %) 68 (18 %)
 Intermediate (1–2 risk factors) 182 (54 %) 197 (53 %)
 Poor (3–6 risk factors) 90 (27 %) 108 (29 %)
Metastatic sites
 1 91 (27 %) 105 (28 %)
 2 137 (41 %) 149 (40 %)
 ≥3 104 (31 %) 116 (31 %)
Prior nephrectomy
 No 49 (15 %) 63 (17 %)
 Yes 283 (85 %) 307 (82 %)
Prior treatment
 No 254 (76 %) 276 (74 %)
 Yes 82 (24 %) 98 (26 %)

BSA body surface area, CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, PD progressive disease

aPatients are classified according to the six Heng risk criteria: poor WHO performance status (≥2), low haemoglobin (<lower limit of normal), high calcium (>upper limit of normal) and time from initial diagnosis to treatment with sunitinib (<1 year), neutrophil count (>upper limit of normal) and thrombocytes (>upper limit of normal)