Skip to main content
. 2015 May 30;206(3):631–647. doi: 10.1007/s10681-015-1472-6

Table 2.

Pearson correlation coefficients between the different traits under well watered and water stress conditions at Bambey (CNRA 2009)

Water regime/Trait Well watered (WW) Water stress (WS)
PYLD HYLD HI 100 (KW) SM (K %) SCMR SP PH PBr PYLD HYLD HI 100 (KW) SM (K %) SCMR SP
Well watered (WW)
 PYLD 1
 HYLD 0.49*** 1
 HI ns –0.71 *** 1
 100 KW ns 0.11 ns 1
 SMK % ns –0.43*** 0.36*** ns 1
 SCMR ns ns ns ns ns 1
 SP ns ns 0.49*** ns 0.30** ns 1
 PH 0.20* 0.46*** −0.42*** 0.19* ns ns −0.25** 1
 PBr 0.25** 0.27** ns ns −0.24* ns ns ns 1
Water stress (WS)
 PYLD 0.27** ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 0.21* 1
 HYLD 0.24* 0.60*** −0.51*** ns −0.31** ns −0.24* 0.35*** 0.25** 0.24* 1
 HI ns −0.45*** 0.49*** ns 0.22* ns 0.27** −0.38*** ns 0.41*** −0.73*** 1
 100 KW 0.20* ns ns 0.38*** −0.25** ns ns 0.19* ns ns 0.22* ns 1
 SMK % ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns −0.21* ns ns 1
 SCMR ns ns ns ns ns 0.31** ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 1
 SP ns −0.45*** 0.45*** ns 0.26** ns 0.49*** −0.32** ns ns −0.40*** 0.43*** ns ns ns 1

*, **, ***, significant at probability P ≤ 0.05; P ≤ 0.01 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively