Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Affect Comput. 2011 Apr-Jun;2(2):79–91. doi: 10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.10

TABLE 1.

Number of Frames at Each Level of Intensity and the Percentage of Each Intensity that Were Selected as Positive by DCBB

AU1 AU2 AU4 AU5 AU6 AU7 AU10 AU12 AU14 AU15 AU17 AU18 AU23
Num Pct Num Pct Num Pct Num Pct Num Pct Num Pct Num Pct Num Pct Num Pct Num Pct Num Pct Num Pct Num Pct
A 986 46.3% 845 43.6% 325 37.1% 293 86.4% 119 40.2% 98 47.9% 367 61.3% 1561 38.1% 309 49.7% 402 72.6% 445 34.1% 134 87.4% 25 77.0%
B 3513 83.3% 3130 79.4% 912 70.4% 371 97.7% 1511 71.3% 705 93.4% 2131 90.8% 4293 73.3% 2240 93.9% 1053 89.7% 2553 70.1% 665 99.2% 190 87.8%
C 3645 90.9% 3241 91.3% 439 83.8% 110 99.7% 1851 87.8% 1388 97.9% 1066 92.8% 5432 82.0% 1040 95.6% 611 97.4% 1644 76.4% 240 98.7% 198 97.3%
D 2312 90.3% 1753 95.6% 73 79.6% 0 NaN 1128 84.2% 537 98.7% 572 88.6% 2234 83.5% 268 96.8% 68 98.6% 966 85.3% 83 98.6% 166 98.9%
E 151 99.3% 601 96.5% 0 NaN 23 96.6% 118 91.4% 153 98.5% 0 NaN 1323 92.4% 232 94.3% 0 NaN 226 80.2% 0 NaN 361 99.1%