. 2015 Sep-Oct;20(5):86–93. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.20.5.086-093.oar

Table 4. - Correlation between upper airways measurements and mandibular length, position as well as direction of mandibular growth in both groups.

Measures	r	P	%	Interpretation
Oropharynx
Xi-Pm	r	P	%	Interpretation	0.31	0.004	9.6%	Significant, positive and moderate correlation
Co-Gn	0.24	0.02	5.7%	Significant, positive and weak correlation
Go-Me	0.13	0.23	1.6%	There was no correlation between variables
Facial depth	0.21	0.06	4.4%	There was no correlation between variables
SNB	0.37	0.001	13.6%	Significant, positive and moderate correlation
Facial axis	0.12	0.26	1.4%	There was no correlation between variables
Ar-Go	0.12	0.28	1.4%	There was no correlation between variables
FMA	-0.07	0.52	0.4%	There was no correlation between variables
Nasopharynx
Xi-Pm	-0.07	0.52	0.4%	There was no correlation between variables	0.37	0.001	13.6%	Significant, positive and moderate correlation
Co-Gn	0.32	0.003	10.2%	Significant, positive and moderate correlation
Go-Me	0.18	0.11	3.2%	There was no correlation between variables
Facial depth	0.29	0.009	8.4%	Significant, positive and weak correlation
SNB	0.34	0.002	11.5%	Significant, positive and moderate correlation
Facial axis	0.28	0.01	7.8%	Significant, positive and weak correlation
Ar-Go	0.29	0.007	8.4%	Significant, positive and weak correlation
FMA	-0.13	0.24	1.6%	There was no correlation between variables