Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul;44(7):939–952.

Table 1:

Description of the total sample and sub-sample of mothers and daughters tested with bone densitometry

Variables Total sample Sub-sample
Mothers Daughters Mothers Daughters
Sample size 712 712 170 170
Age § (years) 43.8±5.9 (29–59) 16.9±2.6 (12–21) 45.5±5.8 (32–59) 18.1±2.9 (12–21)
BMI § (kg/m2) 25.6±4.2 20.7±2.6 26.2±4.6 20.5±2.8
Mothers’ age groups (% of the sample)
  29–39 years 28 16
  40–49 years 56 61
  50–59 years 16 22
Daughters’ age groups # (% of the sample)
  <15 years 30 18
  15–18 years 29 17
  >18 years 41 65
Education (% of the sample)
  elementary 1 41 1 25
  secondary 67 38 71 20
  higher 28 21 28 55
Place of living ¥ (% of the sample)
  village 48 63
  town <50 000 residents 16 6
  town 50–100 000 residents 14 11
  city >100 000 residents 22 20
Self-declared economic situation ¥ (% of the sample)
  bad 1 1
  satisfactorily 23 29
  good 66 63
  very good 10 7
Description of household ¥ (% of the sample)
  we live very poorly 0 1
  we live poorly 1 2
  we live modestly 7 8
  we live very thriftily 14 13
  we live relatively thriftily 54 51
  we live very good 23 25
Physical activity § (MET-minutes/week) 1609±1105 1111±820 1996±1359 1309±1026
§

mean ± standard deviation; significant differences between total sample and sub-sample at P<0.05 as follows:

in mothers,

#

in daughters,

for daughters was given present educational level

¥

in family; () in the brackets indicated minimum-maximum range;

for 417 mother-daughter family pairs with complete physical activity data