Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2012 Mar;31(2):151–159. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e318226b376

Table 3.

Frequency of PAX2 Loss in Abnormal Endometrium verses Matched Adjacent Normal

PAX2 loss in Adjacent Normal Endometrium PAX2 loss in Simple Hyperplasia
No/minimal loss Partial loss Complete loss Total
No/minimal loss 6 5 4 15 P=0.011
Partial loss 0 4 0 4
Complete loss 0 0 0 0
Total 6 9 4 19
PAX2 loss in Complex Hyperplasia
No/minimal loss Partial loss Complete loss Total
No/minimal loss 3 2 32 56 P<0.001
Partial loss 0 4 12 16
Complete loss 0 0 0 0
Total 3 25 44 72
PAX2 loss in Atypical Hyperplasia
No/minimal loss Partial loss Complete loss Total
No/minimal loss 1 7 29 37 P<0.001
Partial loss 0 0 4 4
Complete loss 0 0 0 0
Total 1 7 33 41
PAX2 loss in FIGO Grade 1 Endometrial Cancer
No/minimal loss Partial loss Complete loss Total
No/minimal loss 0 2 10 12 P=0.003
Partial loss 0 0 0 0
Complete loss 0 0 0 0
Total 0 2 10 12

Stuart-Maxwell Test used to calculate P values