Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 25;113(1):107–118. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.179

Table 2. Extracted data from biomarker articles.

  IHC target N Positive cases Primary antibody (dilution) Reference group Uni or Multivariate Survival HR CI P-value
Evasion of growth supressors
Evangelou et al, 2008 Caspase-3 35 NA Cell signalling Bioline (1 : 100) Labelling index Univariate DFS <0.01a 0.298–3.302a 0.990
Evangelou et al, 2008 E2f-1 35 23 (66%) Santa Cruz (1 : 100) >35% cells labelling index Univariate DFS 3.908 0.153–0.992a 0.048
Cavazzola et al, 2009 p53 38 24 (52%) Sigma Biosciences (1 : 100) >10% Multivariate CSS 1.429 0.429–4.725 0.514
Moskaluk et al, 1996 p53 88 40 (45%) Novocastra (NA) >50% Univariate OS 1.46 0.87–2.46 0.155
Madani et al, 2010 p53 142 48 (34%) Dako (1 : 50) +2 to +8 Univariate OS 1.64 1.1–2.45 0.014
Sustained Proliferative signalling
Langer et al, 2006 EGFR 137 72 (53%) Cytomed (1 : 60) >10% cells +ve. Univariate OS 0.99 0.98–1.00a 0.039
Ong et al, 2013 EGFR 359 36 (10%) Novocastra (1 : 10) +2, +3 Univariate OS 1.520 1.03–2.26 0.040
Ong et al, 2013b EGFR 663 NA Novocastra (1 : 10) +1 Univariate OS 0.83 0.66–1.04 .10
      100 (15%)   +2     1.41 .05–1.91 0.02
          +3     0.94 0.58–1.52 0.80
Wang et al, 2007 EGFR 103 33 (32%) Dako (NA) >5% Univariate OS 1.93 1.24–3.02 0.004
Nakamura et al, 1994 HER2 62 15 (19%) Boehringer Mannheim Biochemica (NA) +2 Univariate OS 4.100 1.4–11.8 0.015
Yoon et al, 2012 HER2 708 119 (17%) Herceptest (NA) +2, +3 Univariate OS 0.760 0.59–0.96 0.024
Phillips et al, 2013 HER2 135 31 (23%) Ventana (NA) +2, +3 Multivariate OS 0.840 0.53–1.33 0.470
Dutta et al, 2012 Ki67 98 NA Dako (1 : 50) Slidepath scoring algorithm. Tertiles. Univariate CSS 1.460 1.01–2.12 0.048
Evangelou et al, 2008 Ki67 35 NA Dako (1 : 100) <35% cells +ve, labelling index Univariate DFS 3.757 0.986–11.68 0.050
Falkenback et al, 2008 Ki67 59 50 (85%) Dako (1 : 1000) 0–10% Univariate CSS 3.900 1.7–9.1 <0.001
Tuynman et al, 2008 MET 145 78 (54%) Zymed (1 : 100) +2, +3 Univariate DFS 2.300 1.3–4.1 0.004
Prins et al, 2013 p-mTOR 147 29 (19.7%) Cell Signalling Technology (1 : 50) 2+, 3+ Univariate CSS 1.648 1.019–2.664 0.042
Ong et al, 2013 PAPSS2 337 216 (64%) Abcam (1 : 600) +2, +3 Univariate OS 1.240 0.96–1.61 0.100
Schoppmann et al, 2012 pSTAT3 179 72 (40%) Cell Signalling Technology (1 : 100) >10 (>median) Univariate OS 1.982 1.186–3.311 0.050
Bettstetter et al, 2013 PTEN 117 101 (86%) Cell Signalling Technology (1 : 50) >75% Multivariate OS 0.451 0.233–0.873 0.018
Escape from immune surveillance
Loos et al, 2011 B7-H1 101 74 (73%) Abcam (NA) >+4 (Intensity+proportion of cells) Univariate OS 2.92 1.50–5.66 <0.001
Rauser et al, 2010 CD3 99 57 (58%) NeoMarkers (1 : 100) >2.0 Labelling indices Univariate OS 0.49 0.28–0.85 0.012
Zingg et al, 2010 CD3 central 105 NA Dako (1 : 50) >563 (>median count) Univariate OS 0.53 0.33–0.84 0.008
Zingg et al, 2010 CD4 central 105 58 (55%) NeoMarkers (1 : 40) >30 (>median count) Univariate OS 0.74 0.47–1.16 0.187
Zingg et al, 2010 CD25 central 105 NA NeoMarkers (1 : 10) >33 (>median count) Univariate OS 0.76 0.48–1.22 0.262
Zingg et al, 2010 CD8 central 105 51 (49%) Dako (1 : 50) >225 (>median count) Univariate OS 0.44 0.27–0.69 <0.001
Dutta et al, 2012 CD8 tertiles 98 NA Dako (1 : 100) Slidepath scoring algorithm Univariate CSS 0.69 0.48–0.99 0.048
Rauser et al, 2010 CD45RO 110 93 (85%) Dako (1 : 1200) >0.9 Labelling indices Univariate DFS 0.44 0.23–0.84 0.013
Dutta et al, 2012 CD68 98 NA Dako (1 : 200) Slidepath scoring algorithm. Tertiles. Univariate CSS 1.38 0.99–1.94 0.061
Zingg et al, 2010 FoxP3 central 105 46 (43%) eBioscience (1 : 50) >117 (>median count) Univariate OS 0.65 0.40–1.05 0.079
Deregulation of cellular energetics
Birner et al, 2011 CAIX 182 85 (47%) Abcam (1 : 1000) >median score (20 out of score 0–300) Univariate OS 1.844 1.11–3.08 0.007
Tumour promoting inflammation
Wang et al, 2006 ANXA1 104 41 (39%) BD Biosciences (1 : 100) >25% Univariate OS 1.930 1.25–2.99 0.003
Bhandari et al, 2006 COX-2 90 NA Cayman Chemical (1 : 100) >200 Univariate CSS 3.530 2.11–5.89 <0.001
Buskens et al, 2002 COX-2 145 115 (79%) Cayman Chemical (1 : 200) +2, +3 Univariate OS 3.200 1.5–7.1 0.002
Prins et al, 2012 COX-2 147 39 (27%) Cayman Chemical (1 : 100) +3 Univariate OS 1.700 1.07–2.69 0.023
Tuynman et al, 2008 COX-2 145 78 (54%) Cayman Chemical (1 : 200) +2, +3 Univariate DFS 1.400 0.8–2.6 0.234
Evasion of apoptosis
Ong et al, 2013 DCK 355 126 (36%) Lifespan Biosciences (1 : 10) +2, +3 Univariate OS 0.980 0.75–1.28 0.860
Chandra et al, 2002 GSTπ 15 6 (40%) Vector laboratories 3+ Univariate DFS 2.250 0.71–7.17 0.350
Ong et al, 2013 MTMR9 356 88 (25%) Novus (1 : 350) +2, +3 Univariate OS 1.140 0.87–1.51 0.340
Ong et al, 2013 NEIL2 357 198 (55%) Sigma-Aldrich (1 : 50) +2, +3 Univariate OS 1.120 0.87–1.43 0.390
Ong et al, 2013 SIRT2 359 156 (44%) Atlas Antibodies (1 : 100) +2, +3 Univariate OS 1.310 1.03–1.67 0.030
Ong et al, 2013b SIRT2 663 NA Atlas Antibodies (1 : 100) 2 Univariate OS 1.69 1.10–2.60 0.02
      290 (44)   1     1.81 1.24–2.64 <0.01
          0     1.37 0.96–1.97 0.08
Ong et al, 2013 WT1 358 19 (5%) Dako (1 : 800) +2, +3 Univariate OS 0.710 0.39–1.30 0.270
Inducing angiogenesis
Dutta et al, 2012 CD34 98 NA Dako (1 : 150) Slidepath scoring algorithm. Tertiles. Univariate CSS 0.94 0.67–1.34 0.736
Cavazzola et al, 2009 VEGF 38 22 (48%) Santa Cruz (1 : 400) >30% cells stained Multivariate CSS 0.369 0.095–1.436 0.115
Prins et al, 2012 VEGF 143 90 (63%) R&D systems (1 : 50) >+1 Univariate CSS 1.900 1.22–2.96 0.005
Xie et al, 2013 VEGF-C 128 96 (75%) Santa Cruz (1 : 50) >0.18 Mean optical density Multivariate DFS 3.491 2.156–5.652 <0.0001
Tissue invasion and metastasis
Hector et al, 2010 AXL 92 56 (61%) R&D systems (1 : 100) +3 Multivariate OS 1.91 1.04–3.49 0.036
Falkenback et al, 2008 E-cadherin 59 44 (75%) Dako (1 : 100) Absent/reduced Univariate CSS 3.900 1.2–12.9 0.017
Becker et al, 2010 LgR5 24 NA MBL Internation Co (1 : 50) >5 (Intensity+proportion) Univariate OS 2.860 1.08–7.61 0.040
von Rahden et al, 2011 LgR5 60 51 (85%) Abcam (NA) >15% Univariate OS 2.418 1.17–4.99 0.033
Grimm et al, 2010 MMP-1 60 33 (55%) Hiddenhausen (NA) >46% Univariate OS 1.453 0.7101–2.9718 0.307
Streppel et al, 2012 Mucin 16 95 66 (70%) Abcam (1 : 200) Moderate/Diffuse Univariate NA 1.410 0.734–2.709 0.303
Wijnhoven et al, 2005 p120 96 65 (67%) Transduction laboratories (1 : 1000) <90% Multiivariate OS 2.100 1.1–4.2 0.006
Schoppmann et al, 2013b Podoplanin (lymphovascular invasion) 194 81 (42%) Ventana (NA) Tumour cluster in podoplanin decorated space Univariate OS 1.863 1.086–0.195a <0.01
Schoppmann et al, 2013a Podoplanin (CAFs) 200 118 (59%) Venatana (1 : 300) >10% CAFs Univariate OS 1.843 1.097–3.096 0.001
Birner et al, 2012 RKIP 179 NA Upstage/Millipore (1 : 1000) >80 out of score 0–300 (>median score) Multivariate DFS 0.494 0.278–0.878 0.016
Ong et al, 2013 TRIMM44 349 197 (56%) Protein Tech group (1 : 50) +2, +3 Univariate OS 1.310 1.01–1.70 0.040
Ong et al, 2013b TRIMM44 655 NA Protein Tech group (1 : 50) +1 Univariate OS 1.46 0.89–2.44 0.4
      442 (67%)   +2     1.59 0.96–2.63 0.07
          +3     1.94 1.09–3.44 0.02
Laerum et al, 2012 uPAR (Cancer cells) 60 37 (62%) Raised in-house +2, +3, +4 Univariate OS 2.020 1.11–3.66 0.021
Laerum et al, 2012 uPAR (Macrophages) 60 57 (95%) Raised in-house +2, +3, +4 Univariate OS 1.120 0.62–2.01 0.710
Laerum et al, 2012 uPAR (myofibroblasts) 60 39 (65%) Raised in-house +2, +3, +4 Univariate OS 1.600 0.86–2.99 0.140

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; CSS=cancer-specific survival; DFS=disease-free survival; IHC=immunohistochemical; HR=hazard ratio; OS=overall survival.

a

Values as documented in original articles. Incorrect values excluded from meta-analysis.

b

Validation cohorts from same study not used in meta-analysis due to differences in cut-offs.