Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 2;113(1):159–165. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.185

Table 3. Associations between alcohol consumption and absolute dense volume (cm3) stratified by 10-year breast cancer risk predicted by the Tyrer–Cuzick model.

  Breast cancer risk <3.0%
Breast cancer risk 3.0–4.9%
Breast cancer risk ⩾5.0%
Alcohol consumption (g per day) N % β (95% CI)a N % β (95% CI)a N % β (95% CI)a
0 5360 19.9 Ref. 3120 16.8 Ref. 1248 16.8 Ref.
0.1–4.9 7199 26.7 0 (−1.3, 1.3) 4482 24.1 0.3 (−1.4, 1.9) 1756 23.6 0.8 (−1.8, 3.4)
5.0–9.9 9782 36.2 0 (−1.2, 1.3) 7085 38.0 0.4 (−1.1, 1.9) 2792 37.5 2.6 (0.2, 4.9)
10.0–19.9 1721 6.4 0.7 (−1.3, 2.7) 1307 7.0 0.3 (−1.9, 2.5) 510 6.9 2.9 (−0.6, 6.3)
20.0–29.9 2511 9.3 1.0 (−0.6, 2.7) 2185 11.7 0.5 (−1.5, 2.4) 939 12.6 4.6 (1.5, 7.7)
30.0–40.0 424 1.6 3.0 (−0.3, 6.4) 442 2.4 3.4 (−0.1, 6.9) 197 2.6 10.8 (4.8, 17.0)
Pglobalb     0.37     0.57     <0.001
For every 10 g per day increasec     0.6 (0.1, 1.2)     0.5 (−0.2, 1.1)     2.4 (1.4, 3.5)
Ptrendd     0.05     0.15     <0.001
Pinteractione     0.003            

Abbreviations: β=regression coefficient; CI=confidence interval.

a

Regression coefficients were adjusted for covariates as listed in the footnote of Table 2.

b

Pglobal values were obtained from regression models using alcohol consumption as a categorical exposure.

c

Change in absolute dense volume for every 10 g per day increase in alcohol consumption, from regression models with alcohol consumption as a continuous exposure.

d

Ptrend values were obtained from regression models using alcohol consumption as a continuous exposure.

e

Pinteraction was obtained from the non-stratified regression model by adding a product term between alcohol consumption and the 10-year breast cancer risk, as predicted with the use of the Tyrer–Cuzick prediction model.