Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 14;13:44. doi: 10.1186/s12947-015-0037-0

Table 2.

Appropriateness per site and specialty

Modality Category Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 P value GIM Cardiology P value
TTE Appropriate % (n) 87 (98) 92 (142) 91 (89) 0.32 88 (185) 93 (144) 0.18
May be appropriate % (n) 4 (5) 1 (2) 4 (4) 0.26 4 (9) 1 (2) 0.18
Rarely appropriate % (n) 9 (10) 6 (10) 5 (5) 0.55 8 (16) 6 (9) 0.64
TEE Appropriate % (n) 100 (12) 100 (14) 100 (3) N/A 100 (12) 100 (17) N/A
May be appropriate % (n) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A
Rarely appropriate % (n) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A
SPECT Appropriate % (n) 100 (1) 86 (12) 97 (30) 0.37 91 (30) 100 (13) 0.65
May be appropriate % (n) 0 14 (2) 3 (1) N/A 9 (3) 0 N/A
Rarely appropriate % (n) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A
Diagnostic Catheterization Appropriate % (n) 94 (15) 88 (57) 97 (30) 0.95 82 (18) 93 (84) <0.01
May be appropriate % (n) 6 (1) 12 (8) 3 (1) 0.31 18 (4) 7 (6) 0.2
Rarely appropriate % (n) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A
Combined imaging Appropriate % (n) 89 (126) 91 (225) 93 (152) 0.38 88 (245) 94 (258) 0.03
May be appropriate % (n) 4 (6) 5 (12) 4 (6) 0.85 6 (16) 3 (8) 0.15
Rarely appropriate % (n) 7 (10) 4 (10) 3 (5) 0.2 6 (16) 3 (9) 0.23

Table demonstrating the percentage of cardiac investigations in each appropriateness category (based on ACCF Appropriate Use Criteria) per site and between the General Internal Medicine (GIM) and Cardiology services. P values for differences in appropriate ordering between sites and between GIM and Cardiology are shown. TTE transthoracic echocardiography, TEE transesophageal echocardiography, SPECT single-photon emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging