Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 14;113(4):680–685. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.250

Table 3. Expression of phoshoproteins and response rate.

(a)
pProt AUC and 95% CI Thresholda CR or PR P-value OR and 95% CI
pAKT 0.588 (0.436; 0.74) <120 36.36% (16) 0.0258 1
    ⩾120 68.75% (11)   3.85 (1.13; 13.07)
pEGFR 0.634 (0.491; 0.776) <100 25.00% (5) 0.0277 1
    ⩾100 55.00% (22)   3.67 (1.12; 12.03)
pERK1/2 0.497 (0.348; 0.646) <110 38.45% (10) 0.373 1
    ⩾110 50.00% (17)   1.60 (0.57; 4.51)
pGSK3 0.504 (0.355; 0.653) <130 38.24% (13) 0.228 1
    ⩾130 53.85% (14)   1.88 (0.67; 5.31)
pIGFR 0.513 (0.365; 0.662) <60 33.33% (3) 0.445 1
    ⩾60 47.06% (24)   1.78 (0.40; 7.89)
pMEK1 0.497 (0.348; 0.646) <100 38.46% (10) 0.373 1
    ⩾100 50.00% (17)   1.60 (0.57; 4.51)
pP70S6K 0.585 (0.439; 0.731) <105 36.67% (11) 0.194 1
    ⩾105 53.33% (16)   1.97 (0.70; 5.54)
pP90SRK 0.577 (0.43; 0.723) <70 35.71% (10) 0.176 1
    ⩾70 53.13% (17)   2.04 (0.72; 5.77)
(b)
Multivariate
pProt OR and 95% CI        
pAKT 1        
  3.70 (1.04;13.18)        
pEGFR 1        
  3.53 (1.03;12.11)        

Abbreviations: AUC=area under the receiver operating characteristic; CI=confidence interval; CR=complete response; OR=odds ratio; PR=partial response.

(a) Patients with expression of pAKT over 120 and pEGFR over 100 achieved significantly better response rate. (b) These two phosphoproteins remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis to predict response after bootstrap validation. Statistically significant p-values are presented in bold.

a

Optimal threshold according to the Youden index.