Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug;16(8):967–978. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00139-4

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

Cediranib group (n=62) Placebo group (n=62)
Age (years) 68·0 (60·4–73·0) 64·5 (59·7–73·1)
Sex
Female 28 (45%) 34 (55%)
Male 34 (55%) 28 (45%)
Primary tumour site
Cholangiocarcinoma 38 (61%) 39 (63%)
Intrahepatic 14 (23%) 15 (24%)
Extrahepatic 24 (39%) 24 (39%)
Gallbladder 20 (32%) 19 (31%)
Ampulla 4 (6%) 4 (6%)
Histological grade
Well differentiated 26 (42%) 27 (44%)
Moderately differentiated 20 (32%) 21 (34%)
Poorly differentiated 13 (21%) 13 (21%)
Not specified 3 (5%) 1 (2%)
Previous treatment
Adjuvant chemotherapy 2 (3%) 1 (2%)
Other* 23 (37%) 22 (35%)
None 37 (60%) 39 (63%)
ECOG performance status
0 27 (44%) 28 (45%)
1 35 (56%) 34 (55%)
Disease status
Locally advanced 12 (19%) 8 (13%)
Metastatic 50 (81%) 54 (87%)
Liver 36 (58%) 34 (55%)
Peritoneum 19 (31%) 5 (8%)
Omentum 5 (8%) 4 (6%)
Lung 6 (10%) 9 (15%)
CA19-9 (IU/mL) 298 (38–2258) 53 (10–492)

Data are median (IQR) or n (%). ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

*

33 patients had surgery only (16 in the cediranib group and 17 in the placebo group) and 12 had surgery plus biliary stent insertions (seven in the cediranib group and five in the placebo group).

CA19-9 was assessable in 59 patients in each group.