Table 4. Bias in mean scores for specific author-reviewer region pairs with uncorrected p-values <=0.05; * shows significant bias after application of the Bonferroni correction for multiple hypothesis testing (Frontiers α = 0.001; IEEE-Spain α < 0.0125; IEEE-International α < 0.0028).
Frontiers | Bonferroni corrected alpha=0.0016 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author | Reviewer | N | Difference | p-Value | Cohen’s d |
E. Asia | E. Asia | 130 | 0.35 | 0.047 | 0.3 |
E. Asia | S. Europe | 34 | -0.58 | 0.028 | 0.4 |
N. America | E. Europe | 36 | -0.63 | 0.034 | 0.5 |
IEEE Spain | Bonferroni corrected alpha=0.0125 | ||||
Author | Reviewer | N | Bias | p-Value | Cohen’s d |
E. Asia | S. Europe | 46 | 2.34 | 0.005* | 1.9 |
IEEE International | Bonferroni corrected alpha=0.0028 | ||||
Author | Reviewer | N | Bias | p-Value | Cohen’s d |
E. Asia | N. America | 31 | 1.06 | <0.001* | 0.9 |
E. Asia | W. Europe | 60 | -0.46 | 0.048 | 0.4 |
N. America | W. Europe | 223 | -0.29 | 0.04 | 0.2 |
S. Europe | S. Europe | 109 | 0.40 | 0.023 | 0.3 |
W. Europe | S. Europe | 153 | -0.30 | 0.050 | 0.3 |
W. Europe | W. Europe | 344 | 0.28 | 0.026 | 0.2 |