Table 5. Summary of main findings.
Finding | Frontiers | IEEE
(Spain) |
IEEE
(International) |
---|---|---|---|
Male first authors achieve higher scores than female first authors | X | X | |
There is no significant difference between scores from male and
female reviewers |
X | X | X |
There is no evidence of gender bias (significant interaction between
author and reviewer gender) |
X | X | X |
In a small number of cases, first authors from particular geographical
regions score significantly higher or significantly lower than authors from all other regions. |
X | X | X |
There are no significant differences between scores given by
reviewers from different regions |
X | X | X |
There is little or no regional bias (little or no evidence for interaction
between author and review region) |
X | X | X |
Authors from institutions in English-speaking countries score higher
than authors in non-English speaking countries |
X | N/A | X |
There is no significance difference between scores from reviewers
from institutions in English and non-English speaking countries |
X | N/A | X |
There is no significant language bias (no interaction between
language of author and reviewer institutions) |
X | N/A | X |
Scores for authors from institutions with high Shanghai rankings
are significantly higher than scores for authors from lower ranking institutions |
X | N/A | X |
There is no significant difference between scores from reviewers
from institutions in different Shanghai categories |
X | N/A | X |
There is no bias in terms of the Shanghai category of author and
reviewer institutions (no significant interaction between them) |
X | N/A | X |