Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 17;11(11):e1004602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004602

Table 1. The six orientation domain layout parameters characterizing the common design.

Values were calculated with the code provided in the supplemental material and intervals indicate 95% bootstrap confidence intervals. Also shown is the grand average and the associated one species and common design consistency ranges (CR).

Pinwheel density ρ NN distance ind. charge NN distance same charge NN distance opp. charge Variab. exp. γ Variab. coeff. c
Ferret 3.14 [3.06, 3.23] 0.355 [0.347, 0.363] 0.523 [0.521, 0.539] 0.393 [0.383, 0.403] 0.40 [0.37, 0.44] 1.07 [0.97, 1.15]
Dark-reared Ferret 3.30 [3.16, 3.42] 0.346 [0.334, 0.361] 0.511 [0.499, 0.528] 0.381 [0.366, 0.401] 0.39 [0.35, 0.46] 1.02 [0.90, 1.12]
Cat 3.24 [3.06, 3.42] 0.366 [0.352, 0.381] 0.534 [0.519, 0.551] 0.407 [0.388, 0.428] 0.48 [0.41, 0.58] 0.83 [0.68, 0.95]
Treeshrews 3.08 [2.99 3.16] 0.364 [0.359 0.370] 0.521 [0.514 0.528] 0.404 [0.396 0.411] 0.36 [0.34 0.39] 1.13 [1.05 1.19]
Galago 3.12 [2.93, 3.27] 0.363 [0.345, 0.381] 0.536 [0.522, 0.556] 0.396 [0.375, 0.417] 0.45 [0.42, 0.52] 0.85 [0.71, 0.99]
Ensemble Average 3.14 0.359 0.525 0.396 0.40 1.05
Common Design–CR [3.09 3.19] [0.344 0.357] [0.506 0.522] [0.387 0.399] [0.37 0.42] [0.99 1.11]
One Species–CR [2.93, 3.42] [0.334, 0.381] [0.499, 0.556] [0.366, 0.428] [0.34, 0.58] [0.68, 1.19]