Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015 Aug 8;125:85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.08.002

Fig. 3. Consistent increased delay between sample and choice phases did not significantly decrease accuracy of lesion or sham mice.

Fig. 3

(a) No significant difference in accuracy seen when delay between stages was increased to 12 sec, with a constant maximum separation (≥4 spaces apart). (b) Lesion animals had significantly faster reactions times during the sample and choice phases across the problem, but no significant difference in latency to retrieve reward. n = 8/treatment. *p<.05.