Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 21;21(43):12218–12233. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12218

Table 3.

Prognostic relevance of lymph node harvest in stage II and III colon cancers

First author Year n N+ Insuff rate pT3/4 Endpoints Cut off Prognostic stage II Prognostic stage III
Prandi1 2002 3491 48% 501% n.m. OS, PFS 8-12 (RR = 0.46) vs 13-17 (RR = 0.76) vs > 17 (RR = 0.79) Yes No
Le Voyer2 2003 3411 81% NA 89% CsS N1: ≥ 12 vs > 10 vs > 40; N2: > 35; N0: ≥ 12 vs ≥ 12 vs > 20 and < 35 Yes Yes
Jestin 2004 3735 31% NA NA OS ≥ 12 Yes /3
Johnson 2006 20702 100% NA 92% 5yCsS < 4 neg LN vs > 12 neg LN / Yes
Kelder 2009 2281 32.4% 79% 79% 5yOS < 6; 6-11; > 11 Yes N
Tsikitis 2009 329 100% 49% NA CsS/DFS > 12 / N
Vather 2009 4309 NA NA NA 5yOS 4 LN wide steps Yes Yes
Dillman 2009 574 NA NA NA OS ≥ 12 Yes No
Shanmugam 2011 490 46.9% 24% NA 5yCsS/CsS ≥ 20 Yes Yes
Chang 2012 9644 41% 27.7% 80.2% 5yOS ≥ 12 Yes Yes
Gleisner 2013 154208 34%4 NA 69.4% OS Linear risk reduction up to 25 LN in N- and up 10 LN in N+ Yes Yes
Khan 2014 194459 NA 41% NA CsS ≥ 12 LN Yes Yes
1

Intergroup Trial INT-0089;

2

INTAC-Trail;

3

Lymph node ratio is prognostic;

4

Mean out of two collectives. NA: No available data; 5yOS: 5 year overall survival; 5yDFS: 5 year disease-free survival; OS: Overall survival; CsS: Cancer specific survival; HR: Hazard rate; ACT: Adjuvant chemotherapy; LN: Lymph node; PFS: Progression-free survival; DFS: Disease-free survival; N-: Node negative; N+: Node positive.