Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 17;59(12):7743–7752. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00831-15

TABLE 6.

Correlation between results of the mouse whole-blood assay and in vivo response for SMC-3176 against P. aeruginosa

Isolate MIC (mg/liter) in:
MIC shift in mouse WB assaya In vivo response
MHB CDMHB LB CO2 Mouse WB CO2
PAO1 0.25 0.12 0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25 0.25, 0.25, 0.5, 0.5 2-fold increase Efficacy predicted by MIC
ARC3502 0.12 0.25 0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.5 1, 2, 2, 4 8-fold increase Efficacy predicted by MIC
ARC3506 0.12 0.25 0.25, 0.25, 0.5 2, 2, 2 8-fold increase Efficacy predicted by MIC
ARC4659 8 0.5 8, 8, 8, 16 2, 2, 2, 2 4-fold decrease Efficacy predicted by MIC
AZ 8-18 0.5 0.25 0.12, 0.25, 0.25 0.5, 0.5, 0.5 2-fold increase Not tested
AZ 32-13b 0.5 0.5 0.5, 0.5, 0.5 8, 16, 16 ≥16-fold increase Not tested
JJ 4-36b 0.12 0.06 0.06, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12 2, 2, 2, 4 ≥16-fold increase Efficacy not predicted by MIC
JJ 5-35b 0.5 0.12 0.25, 0.25, 0.5 4, 8, 16 ≥16-fold increase Not tested
JJ 8-16b 0.12 0.06 0.25, 0.25, 0.5, 0.5 4, 8, 8, 16 ≥16-fold increase Not tested
JJ 11-54b 0.5 0.25 0.25, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5 4, 8, 8, 8 ≥16-fold increase Not tested
a

Assay results interpreted by the fold increase between the modal or central MIC in LB CO2 and the modal or central MIC in mouse WB CO2 from three or more independent tests.

b

Isolates against which in vivo failures were previously reported for siderophore-conjugated monobactam MB-1 (11).