Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 1;114(8):1651–1663. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu189

Table 1.

Plant material used for the present study, including estimated average of genome sizes (Vienna, flow cytometry), size approximations (Rutgers, flow cytometry) and karyotypes of Genlisea. All genome size data represent at least two independent measurements (different preparations performed on different days; N = number of runs). The size standards used (abbreviation, value and reference) are explained in the text (Materials and methods). Cytological data for taxa with small chromosomes are based on at least ten different cells counted.

Sample
Rutgers, flow cytometry
Vienna, flow cytometry
Cytology
Species Voucher* 1C value (Mbp) s.d. (N) Standard 1C value, size approximation (Mbp) s.d. (N) Standard Chromosome number (this study) Chromosome size range (based on mean of 10 cells) Previous report
G. aurea var. aurea CdJ Brazil, São Paulo, Campos do Jordão (LE366) 83 8·5 (3) Sa 64·4 2·2 (5) At 0·2–0·4 μm
G. aurea var. aurea Cap Brazil, Minas Gerais, Serra do Caparaó 73 9·9 (10) Bd, Sp, Sa 67·2 1·2 (3) At
G. aurea var. aurea ChdV Brazil, Goiás, Chapada dos Veadeiros (LE368) 63·6 2·4 (5) At
G. aurea var. minor Ita Brazil, Minas Gerais, Itacambira 119 (estimated size) – (2) Bd 2n ∼46 0·4–0·8 μm G. aurea (without location data) 2n ∼50 (Greilhuber et al., 2006); 2n = 46 (Vu et al., 2012)
G. aurea var. minor ChdG Brazil, Mato Grosso, Chapada dos Guimarães (LE360) 131 6·1 (3) Bd 117·1 3·9 (3) Sc
G. flexuosa Brazil, Minas Gerais, Grão Mogol (LE364, as G. aff. violacea ‘giant’) 1140·3 18·4 (4) Zm 2n = 16 1–2·3 μm
G. glandulosissima Zambia, Northern, Kasama (LE263) 189·3 1·2 (3) Rs 2n ∼38 ∼0·5 μm
G. guianensis Venezuela 298·1 2·4 (3) Sc 2n ∼40 0·3–0·7 μm
G. hispidula South Africa, Pretoria, cult. BG Munich (LE294) 2n = 32 0·8–1 μm 2n = 40 (Vu et al., 2012), but pictured are 32 chromosomes
G. lobata Brazil, Minas Gerais, Serra da Araponga (LE296) 1722·4 2·7 (3) Ps 2n = 16 2n = 16 (Greilhuber et al., 2006)
G. margaretae Madagascar (LE309) 143·0 2·6 (3) Bd, Sa 195·2 2·3 (3) Rs 2n = 36 2n ∼ 40 (Greilhuber et al., 2006); voucher doubtful); 2n = 36 (Vu et al., 2012)
G. margaretae Zambia, Luapula, Mansa (LE260) 113 11·3 (2) Bd, Sa 180·8 0·9 (3) Rs 2n = 36, 38 (meiotic counts; n = 18, 19) 0·5–0·8 μm
G. metallica Brazil, Minas Gerais, Itacambira (LE365, as ‘G. sp. Itacambira’) 1056·8 7·6 (3) Sc 2n = 16 1·2–2·3 μm
G. nigrocaulis 2n ∼30 (as G. pygmaea; Vu et al., 2012)
G. oxycentron Brazil, Pará, Vigia (LE321) 74·6 0·5 (3) At
G. repens Venezuela, Amazonas, Aracamuni; Rivadavia et al., 1903 (SPF) 86·1 3·6 (3) At, Bd
G. repens Chapada dos Veadeiros 141·9 2·2 (4) Sc
G. repens Roraima 80·9 1·0 (5) At
G. repens Cerro Avispa 78·0 1·0 (3) At
G. repens Brazil, Minas Gerais, Uberaba (LE371) 149·7 1·7 (3) Sc
G. subglabra Zambia, Kasama (LE266) 2n = 32 ∼1 μm
G. tuberosa Brazil, Goiás, Chapada dos Veadeiros; Rivadavia & Batista 2611 (SPF) 61 5·7 (2) Sa 65·0 – (1) At
G. uncinata Brazil, Bahia, Mucugê (LE367) 2n = 16 995 Mbp (Greilhuber et al., 2006; from Feulgen)
G. violacea Brazil, Minas Gerais, Couto de Magalhães de Minas (LE303) 2n = 16 ∼1 μm
G. violacea Brazil, Minas Gerais, Serra do Cipó (LE312) 1609·7 3·3 (3) Ps 2n = 16 1·5–4 μm

At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Bp, Brachypodium distachyon; Ps, Pisum sativum; Rs, Raphanus sativus; Sa, Selaginella apoda; Sc, Solanum pseudocapsicum; Sp, Spirodela polyrhiza; Zm, Zea mays.

*Laboratory code number. LE indicates identical material used by Fleischmann et al. (2010) for phylogenetic reconstruction.