Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 May 21;5:10235. doi: 10.1038/srep10235

Shifting material source of Chinese loess since ~2.7 Ma reflected by Sr isotopic composition

Wenfang Zhang 1,a, Jun Chen 1,b, Gaojun Li 1,c
PMCID: PMC4650810  PMID: 25996645

Abstract

Deciphering the sources of eolian dust on the Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP) is fundamental to reconstruct paleo-wind patterns and paleo-environmental changes. Existing datasets show contradictory source evolutions of eolian dust on the CLP, both on orbital and tectonic timescales. Here, the silicate Sr and Nd isotopic compositions of a restricted grain size fraction (28–45 μm) were measured to trace the source evolution of the CLP since ~2.7 Ma. Our results revealed an unchanged source on orbital timescales but a gradual source shift from the Qilian Mountains to the Gobi Altay Mountains during the past 2.7 Ma. Both tectonic uplift and climate change may have played important roles for this shift. The later uplift of the Gobi Altay Mountains relative to the Qilian Mountains since 5 ± 3 Ma might be responsible for the increasing contribution of Gobi materials to the source deserts in Alxa arid lands. Enhanced winter monsoon may also facilitate transportation of Gobi materials from the Alxa arid lands to the CLP. The shifting source of Asian dust was also reflected in north Pacific sediments. The finding of this shifting source calls for caution when interpreting the long-term climate changes based on the source-sensitive proxies of the eolian deposits.


The eolian deposits on the Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP) provide a valuable archive for paleo-environmental changes1,2. The CLP began to receive massive atmospheric dust since at least the late Oligocene3,4, which has been affected by three notably prominent exogenic processes of the late Cenozoic, namely the uplift of Tibetan Plateau, the Cenozoic cooling, and the retreat of the Paratethys5,6,7. Many of paleo-proxies have been developed assuming an unchanged source region8,9,10. Thus, source research is crucial to understand the paleo-proxies developed for the loess deposits on the CLP.

The radiogenic isotopic tracers, such as Nd, Sr and Pb isotopes, have been widely used to trace the source of eolian dust on the CLP and its response to the tectonic and climatic oscillations11,12,13,14,15. Combined with other mineral and geochemical tracers16,17,18,19, a similar conclusion seems to be reached in recent years that Alxa arid lands, which receive materials mainly from the Gobi Altay Mountains to its north and the Qilian Mountains to its south through fluvial systems13, are the main source regions for the late-Pleistocene loess20. However, it is still controversial that whether the detrital source of eolian dust on the CLP changed on both orbital and tectonic timescales.

According to the unchanged Nd isotopes, Jahn et al.21 suggested no provenance shift on orbital timescales. In contrast, the electron spin resonance signal intensity and crystallinity index of fine-grained quartz and detrital zircon ages suggested that the provenance of loess and paleosol on the CLP is heterogeneous and spatially variable at least during last glacial-interglacial cycle17,22,23. Recently, Che and Li19 reported more datasets of detrital zircon ages with less statistical uncertainties; Nie and Peng24 conducted detailed studies on the assemblage of heavy minerals. Both of the two studies indicated no glacial-interglacial and spatial change in eolian source for the loess on the CLP. These controversies may be originated from the different size fractions of dust particles on the CLP, as the electron spin resonance signal intensity and crystallinity index are based on fine-grained quartz, while detrital zircon age distributions and heavy minerals analysis are based on the coarse particles.

On tectonic timescales, the shifting Sr, Nd, and Pb isotopic compositions of the <20 μm silicate fractions at the boundary of loess-paleosol and red clay indicated a source shift possibly in response to the gradual additions of relatively young orogenic materials by glacial grinding in central Asia15,25. However, Wang et al.26 argued that the decreasing 87Sr/86Sr ratios over the past 2.5 Ma may reflect increasing grain size rather than source shift while the small changes in εNd values might be within the external analytical error. Considering the relatively small variations of Nd isotopic composition of the source materials, the controversies on the source shift of Asian dust might be solved by Sr isotopic composition when the influence of grain size and pedogenic alternation on the 87Sr/86Sr ratio are carefully considered.

The Sr isotopic composition of sediments can be strongly dependent on the grain size distribution and chemical weathering27,28. The influence of grain size on the 87Sr/86Sr ratio may be excluded by using restricted grain size fraction. Previous investigation indicates that the grain size effect is mainly contributed by the clay minerals in the <2 μm size fraction28. The <2 μm clay fraction has much higher 87Sr/86Sr ratio than the >2 μm fractions while the >2 μm fractions have very similar 87Sr/86Sr ratios due to the limited changes in the content of clay minerals28. Thus, the usage of <20 μm size fraction in tracing dust sources25 may exaggerate the influence of grain size change on the 87Sr/86Sr ratio. Recently, Chen and Li14 used the silicate Sr isotopic compositions of a specific grain size (28–45 μm) fraction as a sensitive source tracer. Combined with Nd isotopic composition, they concluded that this specific grain size Sr isotopic composition is mainly controlled by the source change other than eolian sorting14. The data of Chen and Li14 indicated the source shift of the CLP over the past 2.6 Ma, but the details of the source shift are still unclear due to the low-resolution data (only 10 data point).

This work provides a high-resolution (~30 thousand years per sample) silicate Sr isotopic records of the 28–45 μm grain size fraction of the eolian dust on the CLP since ~2.7 Ma. Combined with Nd isotopic data, the paper aims to constrain the source evolution of the eolian deposits on the CLP on both orbital and tectonic timescales. This work also discusses the possible source shift of Asian dust reflected in the Pacific sediments, based on the 87Sr/86Sr data of eolian dust extracted from the north Pacific sediments in previous study29.

Results

Samples for Sr and Nd analysis were collected from the Xifeng site (35.45 °N, 107.49 °E) on the central CLP (Fig. 1a) and the locations of the Pacific sites cited for comparisons are illustrated in Fig. 1b. The 87Sr/86Sr ratios of the 28–45 μm silicate fractions (donated as 87Sr/86Sr* hereafter) of the loess and paleosol samples show a gradually decreasing trend of about 0.004 since ~2.7 Ma (Supplementary Table S1; Fig. 2). No obvious glacial-interglacial variations in 87Sr/86Sr* have been observed based on neighboring loess and paleosol samples. The gradually decreasing trend of 87Sr/86Sr* since ~2.7 Ma is consistent with the records in Jingchuan and Lingtai sections14,25,26 (Fig. 3). The mean value of 87Sr/86Sr* in this study (0.718978, n = 97) is slightly lower than that of Lingtai site (0.720292, n = 10) by Chen and Li14 based on the same grain size fraction. As expected, the mean value of 87Sr/86Sr* in this study (0.718978, n = 97) is about 0.006 lower than that of the <20 μm silicate fractions of the Jingchuan section (0.724730, n = 66)25 and is 0.002 lower than that of the bulk silicate fractions of the Lingtai section (0.721130, n = 43)26. Opposite trends of 87Sr/86Sr ratio between the Xifeng section and the Pacific cores have been observed during 3 and 0.8 Ma (Fig. 1b and Fig. 4). However, the CLP records and Pacific cores show similar decreasing trend of the 87Sr/86Sr ratio of Asian dust since 0.8 Ma (Fig. 4a and Fig. 4b). The εNd value of Xifeng section shows an increasing trend by 1.5ε unit since ~2.7 Ma (Supplementary Table S2; Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Location map of this study. a, Map shows the geographic setting and sampling site. Blue arrow indicates transportation of eolian dust by northwesterly wind. Gray arrows indicate input of terrigenous materials to the Alxa arid lands from the Qilian Mountains and the Gobi Altay Mountains by fluvial systems13. For discussion, Jingchuan site25 and Lingtai site14,26 with published Nd and Sr isotopes are also shown. b, Map shows the distributions of Gobi desert, Taklimakan desert and the locations of the Pacific cores29,46,47 used in this study. Arrows show transportation of Taklimakan dust and Gobi dust by westerly wind and winter monsoon, respectively. We used the “Matlab” software to generate the two maps and the maps will not have a copyright dispute.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Evolutions of Sr and Nd isotopic compositions of the eolian deposits of the Xifeng section on the Chinese Loess Plateau. From top to bottom, are the global ice volume and/or temperature variations reflected by the oxygen isotopic composition of benthic foraminifera36, the evolutions of Sr (the blue solid dots are corresponding to the paleosol samples) and Nd isotopic compositions with error bars (the solid dots are corresponding to the paleosol samples) of the eolian deposits since ~2.7 Ma in this study, and the stratigraphy of magnetic susceptibility of the Xifeng section with red solid dots (loess samples) and blue solid dots (paleosol samples), showing the locations of the samples selected for Sr isotopic analysis.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cross plot between the silicate Nd and Sr isotopic compositions of eolian dust on the Chinese Loess Plateau. The average isotopic compositions of the two endmembers and isotopic ranges of the materials in the Alxa arid lands are based on <75 μm silicate fraction11,13. The mixing line is in 10% steps. Also shown are the Nd and Sr isotopic compositions of Jingchuan section25 and Lingtai section14,26.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of Sr-Nd isotopic evolution with other records of the Chinese Loess Plateau and Pacific cores. a, Map shows the evolutions of Sr and Nd isotopic compositions of eolian deposits of the Xifeng section (this study), Lingtai section14 and Quartz grain size30,31 and eolian flux38 of the Xifeng section on the CLP; b, Map shows the evolutions of Sr isotopic compositions and the eolian flux and volcanic ash flux in Pacific sediments29, and also the eolian flux of other two Pacific sites, V21–14646 and 885/88547.

Discussion

The limited variations of 87Sr/86Sr* between the neighboring loess and paleosol layers (Fig. 2) imply an unchanged eolian source on the CLP during the glacial-interglacial cycles. However, it may be argued that 87Sr/86Sr* is not sensitive enough to reflect the subtle source changes and the influence of source shifts on 87Sr/86Sr* is offset by the effect of grain size changes (Fig. 4). We think such possibilities are very unlikely since potential source shift to the Gobi Altay Mountains17 would largely decrease 87Sr/86Sr* due to the low 87Sr/86Sr ratio of Gobi materials11,13,14,20. The possible increasing grain size in the 28–45 μm fraction during glacial times30,31 will decrease the 87Sr/86Sr ratio.

It has been shown that the 87Sr/86Sr ratio of the clay particles is about 0.006 higher than that of other grain size fractions11, but the maximum variation of grain size would only introduce less than 0.001 change in the 87Sr/86Sr ratios of bulk silicate14,20. Thus, the observed 0.004 shift of the 87Sr/86Sr* over the past 2.7 Ma (Fig. 2) may not introduced by sorting process but mainly reflect source change. The primary control of source shift on 87Sr/86Sr* is also supported by the long term shift in εNd values (Fig. 2). Unlike Sr isotope, Nd isotope has been commonly used as a robust source tracer with minimal effects from mineral sorting27. The negative correlation between Nd and Sr isotopes lies on the binary mixing line between the Gobi Altay Mountains and the Qilian Mountains (Fig. 3), confirming binary source evolution of the eolian deposits on the CLP13,14,19. Thus, the gradual decreasing 87Sr/86Sr* and increasing εNd values reflect a gradual source shift of the CLP from the Qilian Mountains to the Gobi Altay Mountains since ~2.7 Ma (Fig. 3).

The source shift of eolian dust on the CLP over the past ~2.7 Ma might be related to tectonic and climatic changes. It has been shown that the CLP receives eolian dust mainly from the Alxa arid lands by prevailing near surface winds13,14 (Fig. 1a). However, Alxa arid lands only act a sediment holder rather than a producer. It receives materials mainly from the Gobi Altay Mountains and the Qilian Mountains through fluvial systems13. Mountain processes are the most important mechanisms that produce the silt particle of the loess deposits32. Mountain erosion is a strong function of relief33. The differential uplift history between the Qilian Mountains and the Gobi Altay Mountains may have modulated the relative contribution of debris from the two mountains to the CLP. Considering a relative stable Gobi Altay Mountains, the progressive uplift of North Tibetan Plateau has been inferred to explain the decreasing εNd values of Asian dust since the middle Miocene13. However, the evidence of late Pliocene uplift of the Tibetan Plateau is controversial34. The uplift of the Gobi Altay Mountains since 5 ± 3 Ma35 may increase the relative material contribution of the Gobi materials to the Alxa arid lands, and finally the CLP.

The decreasing trend of 87Sr/86Sr* over the past ~2.7 Ma also seems to match the gradual cooling trend of global climate or growth of Northern Hemisphere glaciations as reflected by the oxygen isotope of benthic foraminifera36 (Fig. 2), implying control of climate change on the source shift. Climate change may modulate the eolian source on the CLP by several means. Global cooling is normally accompanied with the drop of snow line and growth of mountain glacial. Glaciation is one of the most efficient ways of physical erosion37. Thus, the glacial on the Gobi Altay Mountains produced more materials to the Alxa arid lands. Strengthened Siberia High and thus Asian winter monsoon7,30,31 in response to global cooling would transport more materials38 from the Gobi Altay Mountains to the Alxa arid lands (Fig. 4a and Fig. 1a).

The source shift of eolian dust on the CLP might be reflected in the Pacific sediments. Previous studies indicated that the eolian dust in the north central Pacific sediments is mainly derived from the arid lands of Asian interior through westerly winds while the dust deposited in circum-Pacific regions is dominated by volcanic ash39. Taklimakan desert in northwest China is suggested to be one of the most important sources for long-range eolian dust transport by westerly jet stream40,41,42. Occasionally, Gobi dust can also be lifted into the middle troposphere and transport to East Asia and north Pacific Oceans43 (Fig. 1b).

The pacific sediments show very different evolutionary patterns of Sr isotopic composition compared to the loess on the CLP (Fig. 4a and Fig. 4b). It has been noticed that the north central Pacific sediments are the mixtures of eolian dust from Asian interior arid areas with more radiogenic Sr isotopic composition and volcanic ash with less radiogenic Sr isotopic composition29,39. Considering a relatively constant volcanic activity over the past 3 Ma44, the increasing 87Sr/86Sr ratios of pacific sediments between 3 and ~0.8 Ma might be caused by increasing Asian dust flux in response to aridification of Asian interior since ~2.7 Ma (Fig. 4b). The decreasing 87Sr/86Sr ratios since ~0.8 Ma may attribute to the increasing addition of the Gobi dust because contribution of Asian dust dominated the eolian deposits during this period and thus the 87Sr/86Sr ratio is not sensitive to the changing relative contribution of Asian dust and volcanic ash. The Earth’s climate changed fundamentally after middle Pleistocene transition with the dominant periodicity of glacial cycles shifting from 41 ka to 100 ka45. The full glacial climate after middle Pleistocene transition strengthened winter monsoon, which transported more materials from the Gobi Altay Mountains with lower 87Sr/86Sr ratios to the Pacific Oceans. The increasing eolian flux in the Pacific core V21–14646 since ~0.5 Ma and ODP site 885/88647 since ~0.8 Ma may have conformed to this climate evolution (Fig. 1b and Fig. 4b).

Methods

The eolian deposits at the Xifeng site consist of tens of loess and paleosol alternations deposited over the past ~2.7 Ma and the red-clay formation aged from ~6.2 Ma to ~2.7 Ma. The chronology of loess and paleosol deposits have been well constrained by magnetostratigraphy48 as well as orbital tuning based on climate proxies of grain size and magnetic susceptibility30.

The 97 samples for Sr isotopic analysis are selected based on magnetic susceptibility (Fig. 2). Paleosol layers are characterized by high magnetic susceptibility due to the enhanced pedogenesis during the warm and wet interglacial period while loess layers of low magnetic susceptibility are product of glacial climate49. Both samples of high and low magnetic susceptibility are selected for most of the loess and paleosol alternations. The purpose of this sampling strategy is two fold. The neighboring loess layer and paleosol layer have very different grain sizes. Such difference is even larger than the long-term shift of grain size over the past 2.7 Ma50. Thus, the samples of neighboring loess and paleosol may help to examine if the restricting 28–45 μm grain-size would eliminate the effect of grain size on the 87Sr/86Sr signal. Second, the glacial loess may have different eolian source compared to the interglacial paleosol22. Thus, the sampling strategy could also eliminate possible bias of the samples to loess or paleosol layers, which enables us to detect the long-term source shift over the past ~2.7 Ma.

To remove carbonate fraction, the selected samples were dissolved in diluted acetic acid (0.5 mol/L) after Chen et al.11 in the ultrasonic bath for about 10 minutes. Then, the remaining silicate fractions were sieved to obtain 28–45 μm grain size fraction. The extracted 28–45 μm silicate fractions were digested in a mixture of HNO3+HF solution. The Sr and Nd elements in the digested solution were then purified using standard ion exchange techniques. The determination of Sr and Nd isotopes were preformed on a Neptune plus Multi-Collector Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (MC-ICP-MS) at the Department of Earth Sciences, Nanjing University. Instrumental bias was corrected to 86Sr/88Sr of 0.1194 and 146Nd/144Nd of 0.7219, respectively. The Sr standard SRM987 and Nd standard JMCNd2O3 were periodically measured to check the reproducibility and accuracy of isotopic analyses with mean 87Sr/86Sr ratio of 0.7102387 ± 42 (external standard deviation, n = 10) and mean 143Nd/144Nd ratio of 0.5120997 ± 15, respectively. Epsilon Nd values (εNd) were calculated using chondritic values of 143Nd/144Nd = 0.51263851. The analytical results and samples information are listed in Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Table S2.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Zhang, W. et al. Shifting material source of Chinese loess since ~ 2.7 Ma reflected by Sr isotopic composition. Sci. Rep. 5, 10235; doi: 10.1038/srep10235 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information
srep10235-s1.doc (189.5KB, doc)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41321062 and 41422205). We thank Wei Pu, Wancang Zhao, Fei Liu, Le Li and Huanling Lei for assistance in the MC-ICP-MS lab.

Footnotes

Author Contributions J.C. and G.L. designed the research. W.Z. performed Nd-Sr isotopic measurements and collected the data. W.Z. and G.L. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. J.C. refined the interpretations. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. An Z. S. The history and variability of the East Asian paleomonsoon climate. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 19, 171–187, 10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00060-8 (2000). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen J. et al. Zr/Rb ratio in the Chinese loess sequences and its implication for changes in the East Asian winter monsoon strength. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac 70, 1471–1482, 10.1016/j.gca.2005.11.029 (2006). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guo Z. T. et al. Onset of Asian desertification by 22 Myr ago inferred from loess deposits in China. Nature 416, 159-163 , 10.1038/416159a (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Qiang X. K. et al. New eolian red clay sequence on the western Chinese Loess Plateau linked to onset of Asian desertification about 25 Ma ago. Sci China Earth Sci 54, 136–144, 10.1007/s11430-010-4126-5 (2011). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. An Z. S., Kutzbach J. E., Prell W. L. & Porter S. C. Evolution of Asian monsoons and phased uplift of the Himalayan Tibetan plateau since Late Miocene times. Nature 411, 62–66, 10.1038/35075035 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ding Z. L., Derbyshire E., Yang S. L., Sun J. M. & Liu T. S. Stepwise expansion of desert environment across northern China in the past 3.5 Ma and implications for monsoon evolution. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 237, 45–55, 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.036 (2005). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ramstein G., Fluteau F., Besse J. & Joussaume S. Effect of orogeny, plate motion and land sea distribution on Eurasian climate change over the past 30 million years. Nature 386, 788–795 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen J., An Z. S. & Head J. Variation of Rb/Sr Ratios in the Loess-Paleosol Sequences of Central China during the Last 130,000 Years and Their Implications for Monsoon Paleoclimatology. Quatern. Res. 51, 215–219 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  9. Lu H. Y. & An Z. S. Paleoclimatic significance of grain size of loess-palaeosol deposit in Chinese Loess Plateau. Science in China (Series D. Earth Sciences) 41, 626–631 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  10. Prins M. A. et al. Late Quaternary aeolian dust input variability on the Chinese Loess Plateau: inferences from unmixing of loess grain-size records. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 26, 230–242, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.07.002 (2007). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen J. et al. Nd and Sr isotopic characteristics of Chinese deserts: Implications for the provenances of Asian dust. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 71, 3904–3914, 10.1016/j.gca.2007.04.033 (2007). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li G. J., Chen J., Ji J. F., Yang J. D. & Conway T. M. Natural and anthropogenic sources of East Asian dust. Geology 37, 727–730 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  13. Li G. J., Pettke T. & Chen J. Increasing Nd isotopic ratio of Asian dust indicates progressive uplift of the north Tibetan Plateau since the middle Miocene. Geology 39, 199–202, 10.1130/g31734.1 (2011). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen Z. & Li G. J. Evolving sources of eolian detritus on the Chinese Loess Plateau since early Miocene: Tectonic and climatic controls. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 371–372, 220–225, 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.03.044 (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sun J. M. & Zhu X. K. Temporal variations in Pb isotopes and trace element concentrations within Chinese eolian deposits during the past 8Ma: Implications for provenance change. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 290, 438–447 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  16. Li G. J. et al. Dolomite as a tracer for the source regions of Asian dust. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 112, D17201, 17210.11029/12007JD008676, 10.1029/2007JD008676 (2007). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sun Y. B. et al. Tracing the provenance of fine-grained dust deposited on the central Chinese Loess Plateau. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L01804, 01810.01029/02007GL031672, 10.1029/2007GL031672 (2008). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sun Y. B. et al. Distinguishing the sources of Asian dust based on electron spin resonance signal intensity and crystallinity of quartz. Atmos. Environ. 41, 8537–8548, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.014 (2007). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Che X. D. & Li G. J. Binary sources of loess on the Chinese Loess Plateau revealed by U–Pb ages of zircon. Quatern. Res. 80, 545–551, 10.1016/j.yqres.2013.05.007 (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen J. & Li G. J. Geochemical studies on the source region of Asian dust. Sci. China. Earth Sci. 54, 1279–1301, 10.1007/S11430-011-4269-Z (2011). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jahn B. M., Gallet S. & Han J. M. Geochemistry of the Xining, Xifeng and Jixian sections, Loess Plateau of China: eolian dust provenance and paleosol evolution during the last 140 ka. Chem. Geol. 178, 71–94, 10.1016/S0009-2541(00)00430-7 (2001). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Xiao G. Q. et al. Spatial and glacial-interglacial variations in provenance of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L20715, 10.1029/2012gl053304 (2012). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pullen A. et al. Qaidam Basin and northern Tibetan Plateau as dust sources for the Chinese Loess Plateau and paleoclimatic implications. Geology 39, 1031–1034, 10.1130/G32296.1 (2011). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nie J. S. & Peng W. B. Automated SEM–EDS heavy mineral analysis reveals no provenance shift between glacial loess and interglacial paleosol on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Aeolian Res. 13, 71–75, 10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.03.005 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sun J. M. Nd and Sr isotopic variations in Chinese eolian deposits during the past 8 Ma: Implications for provenance change. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 240, 454–466, 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.09.019 (2005). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang Y. X., Yang J. D., Chen J., Zhang K. J. & Rao W. B. The Sr and Nd isotopic variations of the Chinese Loess Plateau during the past 7 Ma: Implications for the East Asian winter monsoon and source areas of loess. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 249, 351–361, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.02.010 (2007). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Grousset F. E. & Biscaye P. E. Tracing dust sources and transport patterns using Sr, Nd and Pb isotopes. Chem. Geol. 222, 149–167, 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.05.006 (2005). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yang J. D., Chen J. & Zhang J. X. Variations in 87Sr/86Sr of the Huanxian profile, Loess Plateau of China from 40 ka B.P to 10 ka B.P and Heinrich events. Geochem. J. 39, 165–171, 10.2343/geochemj.39.165 (2005). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Asahara Y. 87Sr/86Sr variation in north Pacific sediments: a record of the Milankovitch cycle in the past 3 million years. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 171, 453–464 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  30. Sun Y. B., Clemens S. C., An Z. S. & Yu Z. W. Astronomical timescale and palaeoclimatic implication of stacked 3.6-Myr monsoon records from the Chinese Loess Plateau. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 25, 33–48 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun Y. B., An Z. S., Clemens S. C., Bloemendal J. & Vandenberghe J. Seven million years of wind and precipitation variability on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 297, 525–535, 10.1016/J.Epsl.2010.07.004 (2010). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Smalley I. Making the material: The formation of silt sized primary mineral particles for loess deposits. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 14, 645–651, 10.1016/0277-3791(95)00046-1 (1995). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Montgomery D. R. & Brandon M. T. Topographic controls on erosion rates in tectonically active mountain ranges. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 201, 481–489 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang P. Z., Molnar P. & Downs W. R. Increased sedimentation rates and grain sizes 2-4 Myr ago due to the influence of climate change on erosion rates. Nature 410, 891–897, 10.1038/35073504 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jolivet M. et al. Mongolian summits: An uplifted, flat, old but still preserved erosion surface. Geology 35, 871–874, 10.1130/g23758a.1 (2007). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lisiecki L. E. & Raymo M. E. A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography 20, PA1003, 1010.1029/2004PA001071 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  37. Egholm D. L., Nielsen S. B., Pedersen V. K. & Lesemann J. E. Glacial effects limiting mountain height. Nature 460, 884–887 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sun Y. B. & An Z. S. Late Pliocene-Pleistocene changes in mass accumulation rates of eolian deposits on the central Chinese Loess Plateau. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 110, D23101, 23110.21029/22005JD006064 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  39. Nakai S., Halliday A. N. & Rea D. K. Provenance of dust in the Pacific Ocean. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 119, 143–157 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  40. Bory A. J. M., Biscaye P. E., Svensson A. & Grousset F. E. Seasonal variability in the origin of recent atmospheric mineral dust at NorthGRIP, Greenland. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 196, 123–134 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  41. Sun J. M., Zhang M. Y. & Liu T. S. Spatial and temporal characteristics of dust storms in China and its surrounding regions, 1960-1999: Relations to source area and climate. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 106, 10325–10333, 10.1029/2000JD900665 (2001). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yumimoto K. et al. An elevated large-scale dust veil from the Taklimakan Desert: Intercontinental transport and three-dimensional structure as captured by CALIPSO and regional and global models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 8545–8558 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  43. Shao Y. P. & Dong C. H. A review on East Asian dust storm climate, modelling and monitoring. Global Planet Change 52, 1–22, 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.02.011 (2006). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jicha B. R., Scholl D. W. & Rea D. K. Circum-Pacific arc flare-ups and global cooling near the Eocene-Oligocene boundary. Geology 37, 303–306, 10.1130/g25392a.1 (2009). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Elderfield H. et al. Evolution of Ocean Temperature and Ice Volume Through the Mid-Pleistocene Climate Transition. Science 337, 704–709 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hovan S. A., Rea D. K., Pisias N. G. & Shackleton N. J. A Direct Link between the China Loess and Marine Delta-O-18 Records - Aeolian Flux to the North Pacific. Nature 340, 296–298, 10.1038/340296a0 (1989). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rea D. K., Snoeckx H. & Joseph L. H. Late Cenozoic eolian deposition in the North Pacific: Asian drying, Tibetan uplift, and cooling of the northern hemisphere. Paleoceanography 13, 215–224, 10.1029/98PA00123 (1998). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sun D. H., Shaw J., An Z. S., Cheng M. Y. & Yue L. P. Magnetostratigraphy and paleoclimatic interpretation of a continuous 7.2Ma Late Cenozoic eolian sediments from the Chinese Loess Plateau. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 85–88 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  49. An Z. S., Kukla G. J., Porter S. C. & Xiao J. L. Magnetic susceptibility evidence of monsoon variation on the Loess Plateau of central China during the last 130,000 years. Quatern. Res. 36, 29–36, 10.1016/0033-5894(91)90015-W (1991). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sun D. H., Su R. X., Bloemendal J. & Lu H. Y. Grain-size and accumulation rate records from Late Cenozoic aeolian sequences in northern China: Implications for variations in the East Asian winter monsoon and westerly atmospheric circulation. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 264, 39–53, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.03.011 (2008). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jacobsen S. B. & Wasserburg G. J. Sm-Nd isotopic evolution of chondrites. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 50, 139–155, 10.1016/0012-821X(80)90125-9 (1980). [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information
srep10235-s1.doc (189.5KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES