Table 1.
HIV Prevalence and Incidence in Key Populations in Thailand, China, Myanmar, and India
HIV prevalence | HIV incidence | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSM | TG | PWID | FSW | MSM | TG | PWID | FSW | References | |
Thailand | |||||||||
Nationwide | 5.5–28.3% (2003–2007) | 12.5% (2000–2011) | 11.9% (2007–2011) | 8.2% (2006–2008) | 6,8,10,75 | ||||
Bangkok | 30.8% (2007) | 23.6% (2013) | 22.7% street based; 2.5% venue based (2007) |
6.4% (2005) 1.95% (2008–2009) |
0.68% (2010) | 6,13,143,175 | |||
21.3% (2011) |
7.7% (2007) 5.9% (2011) |
7 | |||||||
2.7% (60% were MSM) 2006–2007 |
23 | ||||||||
Chiang Mai | 16.9% (2007) | 10.9% (2013) | 75,175 | ||||||
16.5–6.9% in bisexuals (2011) | 9.30% (2011) | 8.2% (2011) | 75 | ||||||
Bangkok, Ubon, Ratchathani, Lampang, Mahasarakam | 6.3% (2014) | Nittaya Phanuphak, unpublished data | |||||||
Pattaya | 7.4% (2014) | 5% (2014) | 0.83% (2014) | Merlin Robb, personal communication | |||||
Myanmar | |||||||||
Nationwide | 7.8% (2011) | 18.4% (2008) 9.4% (2012) | 12,77 | ||||||
Yangon | 5% (2011) | ||||||||
Mandalay | 9% (2011) | ||||||||
Pathein | 15% (2012) | 10,12 | |||||||
China | |||||||||
Nationwide | 7.4% (2.3–11.4) (2009) | 84 | |||||||
6% (2010) | 9% (2010) | 0.36% (2010) | 0.57% (2010) | 0.02% (2010) | 81 | ||||
4.9–18% (2008–2009) | 85 | ||||||||
Beijing | 7.8% (2010) | 1.7% (2010) | 96 | ||||||
Study in 16 cities | 5.3% (2009) | 94 | |||||||
India | |||||||||
Nationwide | 4.4% (2011) | 7.1% (2011) | 2.7% (2011) | 12 | |||||
Maharashtra | 19% (2012) | 15 | |||||||
Study in 12 cities | 7% (2012–2013) | 0.87% (2012–2013) | 105 | ||||||
Study in 15 cities | 18.1% (2013) | 2.9% (2013) | 100 |
This table focuses on the most recent available data in selected countries and key populations where prevention intervention efficacy trials might be considered. Empty cells correspond to no data available. Data in italics correspond to potential target populations suitable for HIV vaccine trials.