Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 18;113(7):1094–1098. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.295

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of women screened and referred at non-blinded and blinded double reading.

  Screened population
  Referred women
 
  Non-blinded (n=42996) Blinded (n=44491) P-value Non-blinded (n=1235) Blinded (n=1474) P-value
Age distribution, no (%)     0.49     0.91
 50–59 22 704 (52.8) 23 469 (52.7)   653 (52.9) 778 (52.8)  
 60–69 14 537 (33.8) 14 949 (33.6)   417 (33.8) 491 (33.3)  
 70–75 5755 (13.4) 6073 (13.6)   165 (13.3) 205 (13.9)  
Previous breast surgery, no (%)     0.58     0.20
 Yes 3354 (7.8) 3516 (7.9)   129 (10.4) 177 (12.0)  
 No 39 642 (92.2) 40 975 (92.1)   1106 (89.6) 1297 (88.0)  
Hormone replacement therapy, no. (%)     0.74     0.82
 Yes 2064 (4.8) 2157 (4.8)   55 (4.5) 63 (4.3)  
 No 40 932 (95.2) 42 334 (95.2)   1180 (95.5) 1411 (95.7)  
Family history of breast cancera, no (%) Not available Not available       0.59
 Yes       149 (12.1) 168 (11.4)  
 No       1086 (87.9) 1306 (88.6)  
Screening round, no (%)     0.85     0.15
 Initial screen 4784 (11.1) 4968 (11.2)   309 (25.0) 334 (22.7)  
 Subsequent screen 38 212 (88.9) 39 523 (88.8)   926 (75.0) 1140 (77.3)  
Mammographic breast density Not available Not available       0.83
 0–50%       1014 (82.1) 1215 (82.4)  
 >50%       221 (17.9) 259 (17.6)  
Lesion abnormality at latest screen, no (%) Not applicable Not applicable       0.34
 Suspicious mass       718 (58.1) 827 (56.1)  
 Suspicious microcalcifications       334 (27.0) 445 (30.2)  
 Suspicious mass with microcalcifications       85 (6.9) 95 (6.4)  
 Asymmetry       22 (1.8) 28 (1.9)  
 Architectural distortion       72 (5.8) 78 (5.3)  
 Other mammographic abnormality       4 (0.3) 1 (0.1)  
a

At least one first-degree relative with a diagnosis of breast cancer before the age of 50 years or at least two second-degree relatives with breast cancer.