Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 17;88(1048):20140601. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140601

Table 3.

Qualitative evaluation of tissue specimen imaging with a four-point scale scoring system

Evaluation indicators Scoring criteria (four-point scale)
1 2 3 4
Artefact size Small amount of artefact Median amount of artefact Large amount of artefact Extensive artefact
Structure distortion adjacent to the metal Slight distortion Moderate distortion Severe distortion Extensive distortion
Image blurring No blurring Barely perceivable blurring Slight blurring Moderate blurring
Visualization of the bone marrow, cortex and soft tissues Good visualization Moderate visualization Poor visualization Very poor visualization
Overall image quality Very good image quality; high diagnostic performance Good image quality; medium diagnostic performance Acceptable image quality; low diagnostic performance Poor image quality; poor diagnostic performance

The images with the conventional (product) and slice encoding for metal artefact correction with view angle tilting sequence technique between 1.5 and 3.0 T were assessed by three readers in blinded reads for metal artefact reduction.