Table 3.
Evaluation indicators | Scoring criteria (four-point scale) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Artefact size | Small amount of artefact | Median amount of artefact | Large amount of artefact | Extensive artefact |
Structure distortion adjacent to the metal | Slight distortion | Moderate distortion | Severe distortion | Extensive distortion |
Image blurring | No blurring | Barely perceivable blurring | Slight blurring | Moderate blurring |
Visualization of the bone marrow, cortex and soft tissues | Good visualization | Moderate visualization | Poor visualization | Very poor visualization |
Overall image quality | Very good image quality; high diagnostic performance | Good image quality; medium diagnostic performance | Acceptable image quality; low diagnostic performance | Poor image quality; poor diagnostic performance |
The images with the conventional (product) and slice encoding for metal artefact correction with view angle tilting sequence technique between 1.5 and 3.0 T were assessed by three readers in blinded reads for metal artefact reduction.