Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 16;88(1052):20140536. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140536

Table 3.

The averaged mean value of Hounsfield unit in phantom (A = 1, 10, 13), (B = 6, 8, 11, 12) and (C = 5, 7, 9) and in cavity (D = 4, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19), (E = 2, 3) and (F = 20, 21)

Region No metal Al non-OMAR Al OMAR Ti non-OMAR Ti OMAR Zr non-OMAR Zr OMAR Cr non-OMAR Cr OMAR
In phantom A 142.2 82.0 123.4 154.9 84.1 −23.0 4.8 −52.9 29.5
B 141.3 131.2 133.7 150.8 138.4 162.6 96.9 218.9 163.9
C 147.3 137.7 132.3 160.5 151.1 −141.4 48.5 −142.7 85.2
p-value
0.013 0.112 0.019 0.021 0.085 0.454 0.188 0.281
In cavity D −987.5 −969.1 −979.8 −946.8 −970.8 −598.8 −875.3 −454.2 −823.6
E −998.9 −995.1 −997.4 −959.4 −984.8 −800.6 −986.1 −703.6 −965.6
F −997.0 −949.5 −994.2 −989.4 −998.7 −705.9 −863.4 −534.0 −882.9
p-value 0.027 0.125 0.008 0.130 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

Al, with alumina beads; Cr, with chrome beads; non-OMAR, reconstructed image without using orthopaedic metal artefact reduction (OMAR) function; OMAR, reconstructed image using OMAR function; Ti, with titanium beads; Zr, with zirconia beads.

Significant p-values (<0.05) are italicized for emphasis.

The region of interest numbers refer to Figure 1b.