Abstract
AIM
To explore whether genetic variations in the MFN1 gene are associated with low to moderate myopia in Chinese population.
METHODS
The case-control association analysis was used. The study included 100 independent myopia patients (-0.75 D ≤ spherical refraction ≤-8.00 D) and 100 sex-matched healthy controls (with binocular spherical equivalent ranges between -0.50 D and +0.50 D). Four single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) tags (rs3976523, rs13098637, rs6762399 and rs7618348) were selected for genotyping by direct sequencing. The frequencies of genotypes and their alleles were calculated based on the number of SNP genotypes in each sample. The Chi-square test was used to examine the difference in the frequency between the myopia cases and controls.
RESULTS
Genotype distributions in the four SNPs were all in accordance with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; analysis showed that rs13098637 was significantly associated with low to moderate myopia (P=0.003 and empirical P=0.010). There were no statistically significant differences observed for the genotype or allele frequencies of the other three SNPs between the myopia cases and controls in the Chinese population in this study.
CONCLUSION
The current study has revealed that the C allele of rs13098637 in MFN1 had a significant association with low to moderate myopia.
Keywords: myopia, MFN1 gene, single nucleotide polymorphism, association analysis
INTRODUCTION
Myopia is the most common eye disease of visual impairment in the world, involving 80% of Asian youth[1],[2]. The incidence of myopia is very high in the developing countries, especially in Asian countries where the incidence has been increased every year. The incidence of myopia is as high as 40%-70% in the Asian population[3],[4], and even higher in China[5]–[7].
Myopia is a developmental disease. The change in the expression of genes that control eye development or growth will lead to the occurrence and development of myopia. In recent years, some progress has been made toward the molecular mechanisms of the disease, a number of candidate genes have been identified, and many genes and loci related to the disease have been found through gene linkage and correlation studies[8],[9]. However, most of these genes have not been independently validated and no confirmed causal gene has been found for the disease.
The MFN1 gene codes for the mitochondrial fusion protein 1 (MFN1), which is located on the outer membrane of cell. MFN1 is a protein-coding gene of 45.5 kb with 18 exons. The MFN1 protein plays a pivotal role in mediating mitochondrial fusion and morphology in mammalian cells[10]. Mitochondrial fusion is a complex process, where MFN1 is the main molecule that regulates mitochondrial fusion and plays an important role in maintaining the homeostasis of mitochondrial morphology. It facilitates the binding of mitochondria in the early stage of the fusion. MFN1 plays an important role in the movement of mitochondria and acts together with intra-membrane protein optic atrophy 1 (OPA1). OPA1 is localized in the intermembrane space of mitochondria and endometrium, and is widely distributed in retinal ganglion cells as a dynein-related protein. OPA1 is essential for synaptic structure of retinal ganglion cells[11]. Studies have shown that the deletion of OPA1 in the optic nerve atrophy model rats can lead to the structure change of dendrites in retinal neural cells [12]. Therefore, MFN1 assists OPA1 in regulating mitochondrial function[13]. Together, MFN1 and OPA1 may protect the cell against spontaneous apoptosis [14], and have impact on the adjustment of retinal mitochondria. The eye is a high energy consuming organ and changes in mitochondrial function may affect the development of myopia, suggesting that pathogenesis of myopia may be associated with the mitochondria.
Not much has been done about the role of MFN1 gene on myopia. In this study, 4 loci within the MFN1 gene were analyzed for correlation with low and moderate myopia.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Subjects
This study was approved by the Human Subjects Ethics Subcommittee of the North Sichuan Medical College and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Every study subject gave written informed consent. All participants were recruited by Visual Center of North Sichuan Medical College, and most of them are students or teachers and all of them are Han people with no genetic relationship among them.
Inclusion criteria: cases had spherical equivalent (SE) between -0.75 D and -8.00 D, and controls had SE within ±0.50 D. Exclusion criteria: people with eye disease such as turbid cornea and crystalline lens, with genetic system diseases related to myopia, such as the Stickler syndrome and Marfan syndrome. Patients with obvious ocular trauma or a long-term high fever childhood were also excluded.
All subjects were asked in detail about the history of myopia, and underwent a complete eye examination (visual acuity, refraction and slit lamp examination and so on). The diopter was precisely determined using a phoropter. The axial length of eye, corneal curvature, and anterior chamber depth were measured with IOL Master. Lens thickness and vitreous chamber depth were measured by an ophthalmological A-mode ultrasound.
Six milliliter of venous peripheral blood was extracted from each participant in tube with EDTA anticoagulant. The blood was used for genomic DNA extraction using the modified salting-out method.
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Selection and Genotyping
We selected four tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Table 1 showed the position of these four tag SNPs and the minor allele frequencies in cases and controls. All tag SNPs were genotyped by direct sequencing. The primers used in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were shown in Table 2.
Table 1. SNP tags information from the Hapmap project.
SNP | Position | Allele | Minor allele | Frequency of minor allele |
rs6762399 | 180545401 | C | T | 0.386 |
rs13098637 | 180575508 | T | C | 0.125 |
rs3976523 | 180581873 | A | C | 0.3 |
rs7618348 | 180627433 | C | T | 0.289 |
Table 2. PCR primers of all the tag SNP.
SNP (rs number) | Primer sequence |
rs6762399 | F 5′ GATTAGCCAGGATGGTCTCG 3′ |
R 5′ GGAGGAACAAACGATGGAAT 3′ | |
rs13098637 | F 5′ GAAGGACTAGAATTGGATTAAAGG 3′ |
R 5′ TGTAACTTTAACCCAAACAGAAAT 3′ | |
rs3976523 | F 5′ TTGTTAAAGAGGCAAGTAGGTGG 3′ |
R 5′ CGTATTCAAACTAAGCAGCACAG 3′ | |
rs7618348 | F 5′ TCCACTTCTACTGTCTGGGTCC 3′ |
R 5′ AGAGAAGTCTTTGAACAACTGGAAC 3′ |
F: Forward primer; R: Reverse primer.
Statistical Analysis
Clinical measurement data were expressed as mean±SD; significance in difference between groups was determined by t-test. The partial correlation analyses of myopia diopter and refractive factors, such as the axis length (AL), lens thickness (LT), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and the average corneal power (CP), were calculated using the SPSS software (version 17.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Genotypes were tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in case and control subjects with a threshold P value of 0.01 for being significantly deviated from HWE. The inequilibrium may be attributed to birth, population stratification, or natural selection, and may also indicate a correlation with disease. In the control group, if the distribution of tag SNP genotype does not fit the HWE, the tag SNP will be excluded for further correlation analysis.
Genotypes were obtained by direct DNA sequencing and differences in the observed genotype were examined by the Chi-square test. The Single-marker association analysis was performed with Plink (v1.07) and Fisher's exact test under three genetic models (allelic, dominant and recessive), and multiple comparisons were corrected by permuting the case-control status of the subjects 10 000 times[15]. P<0.05 and corrected P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Average Refractive Parameters
Bilateral myopia was present in 100 subjects (42 men, 58 women) with age ranged from 18 to 37y and there were 100 control subjects (45 men, 55 women) with age from 20 to 38y. For subjects with myopia, the spherical refractive errors of the right and left eyes were -3.76±1.79 D and -3.57±1.12 D, respectively. The average refractive parameters for control and case groups are shown in Table 3. Results of partial correlation analysis are shown in Table 4.
Table 3. Measurements of biological parameters from 400 eyes.
Eye parameter (mm) | HCCR | VCCR | AL | LT | ACD | VCD |
Total | 7.84±0.25 | 7.66±0.26 | 24.00±1.11 | 3.67±0.27 | 3.22±0.29 | 16.71±1.03 |
Controls | 7.91±0.02 | 7.74±0.02 | 23.26±0.06 | 3.77±0.02 | 3.08±0.02 | 16.07±0.06 |
Myopia cases | 7.77±0.01 | 7.58±0.02 | 24.74±0.06 | 3.57±0.02 | 3.35±0.02 | 17.35±0.06 |
T value | 6.11 | 6.67 | -17.55 | 8.19 | -10.31 | -15.75 |
P | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
HCCR: Horizontal corneal curvature radius; VCCR: Vertical corneal curvature radius; AL: Axis length; LT: Lens thickness; ACD: Anterior chamber depth; VCD: Vitreous chamber depth.
Table 4. Results of partial correction analysis on eye-related biological parameters.
Eye parameter | D and HCCR | D and VCCR | D and AL | D and VCD | AL and VCD | AL and CCR (H/V) |
r | 0.81 | 0.84 | -0.90 | -0.89 | 0.95 | 0.78/0.82 |
P | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
D: Diopter; HCCR: Horizontal corneal curvature radius; VCCR: Vertical corneal curvature radius; AL: Axial length; VCD: Vitreous chamber depth; H: Horizontal; V: Vertical.
Distribution of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Genotypes and Frequency of Allele
The PCR products from the four loci were visualized on 1% agarose gel after electrophoresis at 150 V and 100 mA for 20min (Figure 1).
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Genotyping
Table 5 shows the distribution of genotypes in cases and controls. All genotypes of examined SNPs were tested for HWE, and no significant deviations were found (P>0.05). The allele frequency of the four tag SNPs are shown in Table 6. This analysis revealed that the rs13098637 polymorphism was strongly associated with myopia. The P value of a Chi-square test for the trend was 0.003, and was 0.012 after the permutation test. The frequency of the allele C of rs13098637 was significantly higher in the myopia than in the control group with an OR of 2.25, indicating that the allele may be a dangerous allele.
Table 5. Summary of genotyping results for the four SNP tags.
SNP (rs number) | Genotype | Obs (exp) genotype counts controls/cases | χ2 | P |
rs6762399 | CC | 31 (30.8) / 35 (36) | 0.967 | 0.617 |
CT | 49 (49.4) / 50 (48) | |||
TT | 20 (19.8) / 15 (16) | |||
rs13098637 | TT | 79 (77.44 ) / 57 (58.52) | 11.64 | 0.003 |
TC | 18 (21.12) / 39 (35.96) | |||
CC | 3 (1.44) / 4 (5.52) | |||
rs3976523 | AA | 46 (49) / 40 (44.22) | 0.743 | 0.690 |
AC | 48 (42) / 53 (44.56) | |||
CC | 6 (9) / 7 (11.22) | |||
rs7618348 | CC | 51 (49) / 47 (47.61) | 0.802 | 0.67 |
CT | 38 (42) / 44 (42.78) | |||
TT | 11 (9) / 9 (9.61) |
Obs (exp) genotype counts: Observed (expected) genotype counts.
Table 6. Summary of number of alleles in the four tag SNPs.
SNP | Allele | Controls | Cases | χ2 | P | OR | Pc1 | Pc2 |
rs6762399 | C | 111 | 120 | 0.83 | 0.362 | 0.83 | 1.0 | 0.844 |
T | 89 | 80 | ||||||
rs13098637 | T | 76 | 53 | 9.06 | 0.003 | 2.25 | 0.01 | 0.012 |
C | 24 | 47 | ||||||
rs3976523 | A | 140 | 133 | 0.57 | 0.452 | 1.18 | 1.0 | 0.898 |
C | 60 | 67 | ||||||
rs7618348 | C | 150 | 138 | 0.047 | 0.828 | 1.05 | 1.0 | 0.999 |
T | 50 | 62 |
Pc1: P value corrected with the Bonferroni method; Pc2: P value after the permutation test (with 10 000 replacements).
DISCUSSION
According to the causes, primary myopia might be divided into high myopia and simple myopia[16]. For high myopia of single gene inheritance, diopter is more than -6.00 D, and mostly over -8.00 D. Simple myopia of multiple gene inheritance is determined both genetically and environmentally with a genetic index of about 60%-75%. The genetic factors are polygenic. The diopter in myopia of multifactorial inheritance was believed to be below -6.00 D. However, in recent years, there is a sharp rise in the incidence of myopia and high myopia and the incidence of myopia above -6.00 D is as high as up to 5%-10%. The myopia is mainly due to excessive speculation. It was speculated that in high myopia cases whose spherical refractive errors ranged from -6.00 D to -8.00 D, some of them might be those of multifactorial inheritance with higher refractive diopter. Therefore, in this study, patients with myopia less than -8.00 D were selected for investigation. Eye refractive status is determined by many factors, among them, the axial length is the most important factor [17]. In this study, adult older than 18y were selected to rule out the interference from the axial variation due to eye development. Our results showed that the longer the eye axis, the higher the degree of myopia, and that there was a close relationship between the ocular axial length and diopter (r=0.90, P<0.01). This was in agreement with most of the previous results that myopia was mainly resulted from the increased axial length of eyeball [18].
Myopia is complex in nature with multifactorial etiology. Twin and family studies have provided convincing evidence for significant genetic influence on myopia with environmental factors having very modest effect. The mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of myopia have been the focus of research in recent years[19]–[21]. Among the numerous methods used, identification of genes susceptible to myopia is an important way and approach to reveal the mechanisms and to prevent and treat the disease. In a 2008 report[21], five SNP loci around the MFN1 gene was found in a British cohort study that are strongly associated with myopia (including high, medium and low myopia). Especially the SNP locus of rs6794192 and rs7618348 showed lower P values. However, in our previous study, after genotyping rs3976523 which is linked with rs6794192 (r2=0.893) in the high myopia population, no correlation was found between rs3976523 and high myopia. For rs7618348, we found the P values in the allele difference between controls and myopia patients was slightly less than 0.05 before correction but more than 0.05 after the correction. Our earlier study also showed that there are other two loci (rs6762399 and rs13098637) in the MFN1 gene may be associated with high myopia (Sichuan university library databases). Because in the British study, most of the population is low to moderate myopia (the mean SE of cases was -3.92 D) [22], and in our previous studies, the results were from the patients with a threshold SE of -8.00 D and the mean SE of our previous case subjects was about -10 D. This might explain the difference. So this study was undertaken to continue investigate the correlation of the four loci with myopia (mainly low and moderate myopia) using the case-control analysis in the Chinese population.
In this study, we did not find any relationship between myopia and rs7618348 SNP flanking the MFN1 gene on 3q26.33, nor myopia and rs6762399 and rs3976523 within in the MFN1 gene. On contrast, we found that rs13098637 locus within the MFN1 gene was related to the disease, suggesting that the locus might be a candidate gene region for myopia in the Han population. The single SNP (rs13098637) that was associated with myopia in this study is located in an intron at the centre of the MFN1 gene. This suggests that MFN1 is very likely the myopia susceptibility gene at 3q26.
Acknowledgments
Foundations: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81341105); Sichuan Provincial Health Department (No.120442).
Conflicts of Interest: Zou YC, None; Lei JH, None; Wang Y, None; Xu S, None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pan CW, Ramamurthy D, Saw SM. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012;32(1):3–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00884.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Donovan L, Sankaridurg P, Ho A, Naduvilath T, Smith EL, 3rd, Holden BA. Myopia progression rates in urban children wearing single vision spectacles. Optom. 2012;89(1):27–32. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182357f79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sawada A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Iwase A, Yamamoto T, Tajimi Study Group Refractive errors in an elderly Japanese population: the Tajimi study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(2):363–370. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pan CW, Wong TY, Lavanya R, Wu RY, Zheng YF, Lin XY, Mitchell P, Aung T, Saw SM. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in Indians: the Singapore Indian Eye Study (SINDI) Invest Ophthalmol. 2011;52(6):3166–3173. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu HH, Xu L, Wang YX, Wang S, You QS, Jonas JB. Prevalence and progression of myopic retinopathy in Chinese adults: the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(9):1763–1768. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.He M, Zheng Y, Xiang F. Prevalence of myopia in urban and rural children in mainland China. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(1):40–44. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181940719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang M, Li L, Chen L, Lee J, Wu J, Yang A, Chen C, Xu D, Lam DS, Sharma A, Griffiths S, Gao Y, Congdon N. Population density and refractive error among Chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(10):4969–4976. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhu MM, Yap MK, Ho DW, Fung WY, Ng PW, Gu YS, Yip SP. Investigating the relationship between UMODL1 gene polymorphisms and high myopia: a case-control study in Chinese. BMC Med Genet. 2012;13:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-13-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Solouki AM, Verhoeven VJ, van Duijn CM, Verkerk AJ, Ikram MK, Hysi PG, Despriet DD, van Koolwijk LM, Ho L, Ramdas WD, Czudowska M, Kuijpers RW, Amin N, Struchalin M, Aulchenko YS, van Rij G, Riemslag FC, Young TL, Mackey DA, Spector TD, Gorgels TG, Willemse Assink JJ, Isaacs A, Kramer R, Swagemakers SM, Bergen AA, van Oosterhout AA, Oostra BA, Rivadeneira F, Uitterlinden AG, Hofman A, de Jong PT, Hammond CJ, Vingerling JR, Klaver CC. A genome-wide association study identifies a susceptibility locus for refractive errors and myopia at 15q14. Nat Genet. 2010;42(10):897–901. doi: 10.1038/ng.663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Santel A, Frank S, Gaume B, Herrler M, Youle RJ, Fuller MT. Mitofusin-1 protein is a generally expressed mediator of mitochondrial fusion in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci. 2003;116(Pt 13):2763–2774. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Williams PA, Piechota M, von Ruhland C, Taylor E, Morgan JE, Votruba M. Opa1 is essential for retinal ganglion cell synaptic architecture and connectivity. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 2):493–505. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Williams PA, Morgan JE, Votruba M. Opa1 deficiency in a mouse model of dominant optic atrophy leads to retinal ganglion cell dendropathy. Brain. 2010;133(10):2942–2951. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cipolat S, Martins de Brito O, Dal Zilio B, Scorrano L. OPA1 requires mitofusin 1 to promote mitochondrial fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(45):15927–15932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407043101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Davies V, Votruba M. Focus on molecules: the OPA1 protein. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83(5):1003–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2005.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, Sham PC. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–575. doi: 10.1086/519795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hu DN, Zhu RY, Lv F, Qu J. Myopia. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jonas JB, Nangia V, Sinha A, Gupta R. Corneal refractive power and its correlations with ocular and general parameters: the Central India Eye and Medical Study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(9):1805–1811. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Park SH, Park KH, Kim JM, Choi CY. Relation between axial length and ocular parameters. Ophthalmologica. 2010;224(3):188–193. doi: 10.1159/000252982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hammond CJ, Snieder H, Gilbert CE, Spector TD. Genes and environment in refractive error: the twin eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(6):1232–1236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dirani M, Chamberlain M, Shekar SN, Islam AF, Garoufalis P, Chen CY, Guymer RH, Baird PN. Heritability of refractive error and ocular biometrics: the Genes in Myopia (GEM) twin study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(11):4756–4761. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lopes MC, Andrew T, Carbonaro F, Spector TD, Hammond CJ. Estimating heritability and shared environmental effects for refractive error in twin and family studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(11):126–131. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Andrew T, Maniatis N, Carbonaro F, Liew SH, Lau W, Spector TD, Hammond CJ. Identification and replication of three novel myopia common susceptibility gene loci on chromosome 3q26 using linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(10):e10000220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]