Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 19;6:1770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01770

Table 3.

Results of the exploratory factor analysis for the two tests.

Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 4 Communalities
Test 1 Gambler's fallacy 0.00 −0.07 0.53 −0.06 0.27
Sunk cost fallacy 0.15 −0.09 0.37 0.17 0.27
Base-rate neglect 0.98 0.09 0.03 −0.01 0.99
Monty Hall problem −0.02 0.02 −0.03 0.86 0.73
Insensitivity to sample size 0.32 −0.18 −0.06 −0.07 0.12
Relativity bias −0.06 0.09 0.57 −0.14 0.28
Outcome bias 0.01 0.00 0.47 0.10 0.26
Anchoring effect 0.09 0.99 0.00 0.01 0.99
Test 2 Gambler's fallacy 0.90 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.82
Sunk cost fallacy 0.15 −0.10 0.16 0.24 0.15
Base-rate neglect 0.10 −0.04 0.51 −0.08 0.26
Monty Hall problem 0.05 0.99 −0.01 0.03 0.99
Insensitivity to sample size −0.10 −0.12 −0.01 0.17 0.05
Relativity bias −0.18 0.20 0.40 0.05 0.24
Outcome bias −0.01 0.04 −0.08 0.68 0.44
Anchoring effect −0.01 −0.11 0.38 −0.06 0.15

Factor loadings of 0.3 and above are in bold font. Factors with one item loading are presented only for demonstrative purposes.