Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 18;53(12):3750–3759. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01568-15

TABLE 2.

AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for ROC curves calculated at optimal cutoff for ceramide (d18:1/16:0), 4α-formyl-4β-methyl-5α-cholesta-8-en-3β-ol, 12(R)-HETE, and cholesterol sulfate

Significant metabolite by comparison group AUCa 95% CIb Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) P valuec Fold change
TB vs controls
    Ceramide (d18:1/16:0) 0.912 0.850–0.974 84.8 86.7 3.90E-08 26.15
    4α-Formyl-4β-methyl-5α-cholesta-8-en-3β-ol 0.856 0.758–0.853 89.1 80.0 5.55E-07 1.83
    12(R)-HETE 0.914 0.846–0.981 84.8 90.0 5.63E-03 4.19
    Cholesterol sulfate 0.905 0.829–0.981 87.0 86.7 4.73E-10 6.09
TB vs CAP
    Ceramide (d18:1/16:0) 0.717 0.595–0.840 71.7 66.7 5.24E-03 3.82
    4α-Formyl-4β-methyl-5α-cholesta-8-en-3β-ol 0.894 0.816–0.972 84.8 83.3 9.78E-10 2.16
    12(R)-HETE 0.793 0.683–0.904 89.1 63.3 2.32E-02 4.69
    Cholesterol sulfate 0.802 0.693–0.911 80.4 70.0 6.46E-05 3.75
a

AUC, area under the receiving operating characteristic curve.

b

CI, confidence interval.

c

All P values were calculated using Student's t test.