Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 1;4(1):417–424. doi: 10.1089/biores.2015.0006

Table 1.

Comparison of CBC Analysis on BMA, Ficoll-Separated Marrow, and cBMA from the MarrowStim P.A.D. Kit (n = 5)

  TNC (k/μL) MONO (k/μL) LYM (k/μL) NEU (k/μL) EOS (k/μL) BASO (k/μL) PLT (k/μL) RBC (M/μL)
Preparation
 BMA 23 ± 7 1 ± 0 5 ± 1 17 ± 6 0 ± 0 0.1 ± 0.0 117 ± 26 4 ± 1
 Ficoll 53 ± 20 3 ± 2 9 ± 8 27 ± 16 4 ± 7 0.7 ± 0.4 90 ± 34 0 ± 0
 MarrowStim 233 ± 61 10 ± 2 51 ± 11 160 ± 49 11 ± 16 1.2 ± 0.6 753 ± 233 3 ± 2
Fold increase from BMA
 Ficoll 2.3 2.4 3.9 1.6 N/A 10.6 0.8 0.03
 MarrowStim 10 8.1 10.6 9.4 N/A 19.4 6.4 0.7

BASO, basophil; BMA, bone marrow aspirate; CBC, complete blood count; cBMA, concentrated bone marrow aspirate; EOS, eosinophil; LYM, lymphocyte; MONO, monocyte; N/A, not available due to zero value in input BMA; NEU, neutrophil; PLT, platelet; RBC, red blood cell; TNC, total nucleated cells.