Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 2015 Aug 3;43(16):7971–7983. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv755

Origin-of-transfer sequences facilitate mobilisation of non-conjugative antimicrobial-resistance plasmids in Staphylococcus aureus

Frances G O'Brien 1,2, Karina Yui Eto 1, Riley J T Murphy 1, Heather M Fairhurst 1, Geoffrey W Coombs 1,2,3, Warren B Grubb 1,2, Joshua P Ramsay 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC4652767  PMID: 26243776

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of hospital, community and livestock-associated infections and is increasingly resistant to multiple antimicrobials. A significant proportion of antimicrobial-resistance genes are plasmid-borne, but only a minority of S. aureus plasmids encode proteins required for conjugative transfer or Mob relaxase proteins required for mobilisation. The pWBG749 family of S. aureus conjugative plasmids can facilitate the horizontal transfer of diverse antimicrobial-resistance plasmids that lack Mob genes. Here we reveal that these mobilisable plasmids carry copies of the pWBG749 origin-of-transfer (oriT) sequence and that these oriT sequences facilitate mobilisation by pWBG749. Sequences resembling the pWBG749 oriT were identified on half of all sequenced S. aureus plasmids, including the most prevalent large antimicrobial-resistance/virulence-gene plasmids, pIB485, pMW2 and pUSA300HOUMR. oriT sequences formed five subfamilies with distinct inverted-repeat-2 (IR2) sequences. pWBG749-family plasmids encoding each IR2 were identified and pWBG749 mobilisation was found to be specific for plasmids carrying matching IR2 sequences. Specificity of mobilisation was conferred by a putative ribbon-helix-helix-protein gene smpO. Several plasmids carried 2–3 oriT variants and pWBG749-mediated recombination occurred between distinct oriT sites during mobilisation. These observations suggest this relaxase-in trans mechanism of mobilisation by pWBG749-family plasmids is a common mechanism of plasmid dissemination in S. aureus.

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of serious skin infections, pneumonia, sepsis and endocarditis and is carried asymptomatically by roughly a third of the human population (1,2). S. aureus isolates play host to a plethora of mobile genetic elements, including bacteriophage, chromosomally integrated elements, transposons and plasmids (36). The majority of antimicrobial-resistance genes and many of the known virulence genes are carried on plasmids (5). Through apparent acquisition of these plasmids, some strains of S. aureus have become resistant to almost all currently available antimicrobials, including β-lactams, macrolides, aminoglycosides and glycopeptides (79).

Ninety percent of S. aureus isolates carry at least one plasmid and ∼80% carry a plasmid >20 kb (5). Staphylococcal plasmids can be grouped by size and replication mechanism, ranging from small (<5 kb) and often cryptic rolling-circle-replication (RCR) plasmids to larger (8–50 kb) theta-replicating plasmids. Self-transmissible conjugative plasmids only represent around 5% of all sequenced S. aureus plasmids (10). Despite the low abundance of conjugative plasmids, phylogenomic comparisons clearly indicate that plasmid exchange between diverse S. aureus lineages occurs (5,11). For example, the penicillinase-encoding plasmid pMW2 has been identified in diverse, internationally isolated, community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) lineages, including MW2, USA300, JKD6177 and JKD6159. The sequence divergence between these CA-MRSA suggests pMW2 arrived in each strain independently, despite pMW2 not carrying conjugation genes (12,13).

Conjugative DNA transfer requires the production of a mating pore between two cells and recruitment of DNA to the mating pore. The mating-pore genes usually encode a type-IV secretion system (T4SS) capable of transferring a protein-tethered DNA substrate to a recipient cell in an energy-dependent process (14). In gram-positive organisms the process of conjugation is less well understood than in gram-negative species, but several core components of the T4SS are conserved (15). Recruitment of DNA to the T4SS requires the action of a site-specific endonuclease called a relaxase or Mob protein, which makes a single-strand nick at the origin-of-transfer (oriT) sequence and becomes covalently attached to it (16,17). The Mob protein then recruits the DNA to the T4SS, through interaction with the T4SS coupling protein (17). Conjugative plasmids can facilitate the transfer of non-conjugative plasmids present in the same cell; a process known as mobilisation. It is generally accepted that mobilisable plasmids encode distinct Mob protein(s) that target a distinct oriT sequence located on the mobilisable plasmid and that this mobilisable-plasmid encoded Mob recruits the mobilisable-plasmid DNA to the mating pore (17). Documented evidence of plasmid mobilisation via this mechanism in S. aureus is sparse (18,19) and bioinformatics analyses have revealed that only ∼32% of S. aureus plasmids encode putative Mob proteins (5,11). These observations are not exclusive to Staphylococcus; half of all sequenced bacterial plasmids appear to lack Mob-gene loci (17,20,21). Mathematical models of plasmid persistence suggest that horizontal transfer may be essential for the long-term evolutionary maintenance of plasmids in bacterial populations, regardless of the loci they carry (2224). Therefore the paucity of conjugation and mobilisation genes in S. aureus seems to conflict both with the observed distribution of plasmids in S. aureus and their evolutionary persistence.

Sequencing of plasmids (5) from S. aureus isolated from carriers of CA-MRSA in remote Western Australian communities (2) recently identified plasmids pWBG745, pWBG748 and pWBG749, which carry an uncharacterised conjugation-gene cluster, distinct from the well-characterised pSK41/pGO1 family of staphylococcal conjugative plasmids (10,25). A pWBG745-like plasmid, pBRZ01, was subsequently demonstrated to mediate conjugative transfer of vancomycin and aminoglycoside resistance in a Brazilian CA-MRSA isolate (9). We recently demonstrated that pWBG749 is capable of efficient conjugative transfer into at least seven distinct S. aureus lineages and is furthermore capable of mobilising several genetically distinct plasmids isolated from both community and hospital-associated S. aureus strains (25). None of the plasmids mobilised by pWBG749 encode recognisable Mob proteins, suggesting that these plasmids are mobilised through a distinct mechanism (25).

A non-conjugative plasmid that harbours a copy of a conjugative plasmid's oriT sequence can be mobilised by the in trans activity of the conjugative-plasmid encoded relaxase. This relaxase-in trans mechanism of plasmid mobilisation is routinely utilised by molecular biologists for mobilisation of plasmids using the Escherichia coli plasmid RP4 conjugation system (26). Nevertheless, mobilisable genetic elements that lack dedicated, cis-encoded Mob proteins are rarely documented in nature (2732) and current dogma defines mobilisable plasmids as being those that carry both oriT and Mob gene(s) (17). In this study we define the minimal oriT of conjugative plasmid pWBG749 and reveal that carriage of this oriT by a normally non-mobilisable plasmid confers the ability to be mobilised by pWBG749. More surprisingly, we find that sequences resembling the pWBG749-family of oriT sequences are present on 53% of currently sequenced S. aureus plasmids. Our analyses suggest that oriT sequences have been repeatedly acquired by non-conjugative S. aureus plasmids during their evolution and that this relaxase-in trans mechanism of mobilisation is likely a dominant mechanism of horizontal plasmid transfer in S. aureus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and plasmids are listed in Supplementary Table S1. E. coli and S. aureus strains were cultured on solid or liquid LB medium, supplemented with appropriate antibiotics to maintain plasmids. Primers listed in Supplementary Table S2 were used to amplify oriT regions that were subsequently cloned into pLI50 as EcoRI-HindIII or EcoRI-BamHI fragments. All pLI50 constructs were sequenced using primers 21 and 22. S. aureus plasmid DNA was extracted as previously described (33). For construction of strains used in mobilisation experiments, pLI50 clones were electroporated into RN4220 using the method described by Schenk & Laddaga (34) and pWBG749e was subsequently introduced by conjugation and selected for by plating on media containing erythromycin (Em) and chloramphenicol (Cm) to select against donors. All conjugation assays were carried out using a modified version of the polyethylene glycol (PEG) method, which promotes cell-cell contact in liquid cultures and produces conjugation frequencies similar to filter-matings (35). Briefly, 0.5 ml of overnight donor and recipient cultures were mixed and pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 g. Pellets were then suspended in 100 μl LB and then mixed with a 50% mixture of autoclaved BHIB and PEG 6000 and placed in a 30 ml bottle and incubated overnight at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm. Cells were recovered by centrifugation and suspended in 1 ml LB before further dilution and plating on selective media. WBG4515 was used as a recipient and streptomycin (Sm)/novobiocin (Nb) was used to select against donors. Exconjugants carrying pWBG749e and pLI50 were selected for using Em and Cm, respectively.

For analysis of staphylococcal plasmid sequences, the NCBI RefSeq database was queried with the term ‘Staphylococcus[Organism] AND plasmid[Title]’. Retrieved sequences were added to an existing collection of S. aureus plasmid sequences (11). Duplicates were identified by sorting sequences by name and accession number and by using Elimdupes (http://hcv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/ELIMDUPES/elimdupes.html). Duplicate sequences and sequences >60 kb were discarded. This produced a collection of 360 unique plasmid sequences as of January 10th 2013 (Supporting Dataset S1). The sequences were used to create custom BLASTN databases using standalone BLAST version 2.2.20 (36). To identify oriT sequences, the region from DNA motif AR3 to the core sequence was used as a query and each sequence was manually inspected before inclusion. Identified sequences with novel IR2 repeats were used in subsequent searches and this process was iterated until no new IR2 repeat variants were identified. Once oriT sequences were categorised, additional BLASTN databases were created of plasmid sets with and without oriT sequences. TBLASTN searches for cadmium resistance and mobilisation loci on S. aureus plasmids were carried out using CadA (GI:335749909), CadD (GI: 695199049), MobA (GI:212383462) and Pre (GI:60392927) as query sequences. TBLASTN searches for antimicrobial-resistance loci on pWBG749-like contigs in the Orange County MRSA dataset were carried out using BlaZ (SAP030A_004), AacA-AphD (GI:618846397), VanA (YP_003864126), VanB (GI:618846277), MphBM (GI:3892644), CAT (GI:1015408) and TetM (GI:302750286) as queries. All BLAST hits were manually inspected for false positives.

Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) structure predictions were carried out using Mfold (37) and predicted structures were redrawn using VARNA (38). DNA alignments of the oriT sequences were carried out using T-Coffee in rcoffee mode with default settings (39,40) or Clustal W (41) and redrawn using Jalview (42). Circular BLASTN alignments were carried out using BLASTN (36) in ‘ungapped’ mode and displayed using BRIG (43). Tree construction was carried out using PhyML software using a neighbour-joining starting tree with otherwise default settings. Construction of a maximum credibility tree using BEAST (using a random local-clock model and otherwise default parameters) and TreeAnnotator (44) produced a tree that supported all major nodes of the PhyML-produced tree (not shown).

RESULTS

Identification of the pWBG749 oriT sequence

Sequence comparisons of pWBG745, pWBG748, pWBG749 and pBRZ01 revealed that all these plasmids carried a conserved ∼24 kb cluster (Supplementary Figure S1) carrying 24 open-reading-frames (ORFs), encoding proteins with likely roles in conjugation (Supplementary Table S3) (25). Proteins encoded by genes in this cluster were renamed staphylococcal mobilisation plasmid proteins SmpA-SmpX. PSI-BLASTP queries using SmpP (SAP031A_037) revealed it showed similarity to relaxases on conjugative plasmids of Bacillus thuringiensis MC28 (pMC189) and Lactococcus gavieae (pGL5) and the vancomycin-resistance plasmids pMG2200 of Enterococcus faecalis and pHTβ of E. faecium (4548) (Supplementary Figure S2). Homologues of 17/24 of the Smp proteins were identified amongst these plasmids (Supplementary Table S3). SmpP carried N-terminal sequence motifs common to the MOBMG family of relaxases (46,48), including two conserved tyrosine residues and a histidine-triad motif likely required for divalent cation binding (Supplementary Figure S2). Analysis of SmpP using CONJscan (49), which scans a database of hidden-markov-model profiles created from a curated database of conjugation proteins, placed SmpP in the large MOBP family of relaxases (E = 4 × 10−47).

oriT DNA sequences are commonly located upstream of their cognate Mob gene and usually comprise at least one hairpin-forming inverted-repeat (IR) sequence located 5′ to a ‘core’ region containing the DNA cleavage site nic. Core sequences are often conserved between divergent oriT sequences (50), presumably due to evolutionary constraints on the catalytic site of the Mob protein. Comparison of the nearest non-coding DNA located upstream of the Mob genes on pWBG749, pMG2200, pMC189, pHTβ and pGL5 revealed that each region carried the sequence 5′-CTTATGCTCTT-3′ (hereafter referred to as the oriT core). A structurally comparable configuration of IR sequences was identified adjacent to the core site on each plasmid (IR1, IR2 and IR3). Mfold secondary-structure prediction (37) indicated each region could adopt a similar ssDNA branched-hairpin structure adjacent to the core sequence, despite a lack of repeat-sequence similarity (Figure 1B). Three additional IR sequences (accessory repeats AR1-AR3) were located upstream of IR1-IR3 on pWBG749 (Figure 1A). pMG2200 and pHTβ carry distinct repetitive sequences in the same region (46,48).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Conserved repeat structure of the pWBG749 oriT. (A) Sequence alignment of DNA between smpN and smpO on pWBG749 and the oriT sequence identified on mobilisable plasmid pWBG747 (25). Both regions were cloned into pLI50 and used in conjugative mobilisation experiments in panel (C). Repeat structures are highlighted with colours that correspond to the structure predictions in B and constructed clones in panel (C). (B) Mfold (37) predictions of the ssDNA structure formed adjacent to the core sites found on pWBG749, pMC189, pGL5, pMG2200 and pHTβ. Estimated Gibbs free-energy values for each structure are shown below. Mfold-predicted non-classical base-pairing is shown in red. (C) Conjugative mobilisation of the pWBG749 and pWBG747 oriT sequence-carrying constructs and delineation of the minimal oriT sequence. Cloned oriT fragments (a-f) are depicted on the left and the outcome of mobilisation experiments (Table 1) is indicated on the right (as ticks or crosses) for clones carrying pWBG749 or pWBG747-derived oriT sequences.

The putative oriT region identified between the smpN and smpO genes (Figure 1A) was amplified by polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) and cloned into the non-mobilisable shuttle vector pLI50 (carrying Cm resistance) (51), producing pLI749a. pLI50 and pLI749a were introduced into S. aureus strain RN4220 by electroporation. Plasmid pWBG749e (a pWBG749 derivative carrying Em resistance (25)) was introduced into each strain by conjugation and the resulting exconjugants were used as donors in mobilisation experiments. pLI749a, but not pLI50, was able to be transferred by conjugation to WBG4515 (Sm/Nb-resistant derivative of RN450) at an average frequency of 6.9 × 10−7 recipients per donor, roughly 40-fold lower than the average conjugation frequency of pWBG749e (2.8 × 10−5) from the same donor (Table 1). No pLI50/pLI749a transfer was observed from donors lacking pWBG749e. To estimate the frequency of plasmid cotransfer, Cm/Sm-resistant WBG4515 exconjugants carrying pLI749a were subcultured on media containing Em/Cm/Sm. This revealed 43–75% (85/126 colonies from 2 experiments) of exconjugants carrying pLI749a also carried pWBG749e. Since pLI49a was able to transfer alone to WBG4515, this suggested that the observed mobilisation of pLI749a was not due to oriT-mediated recombination/cointegration with pWBG749e. To discount the possibility that recombination between the oriT sites on pWBG749e and pLI749a was responsible for the plasmid cotransfer, DNA was extracted from an Em/Cm/Sm/Nb-resistant exconjugant and the pLI749a oriT was PCR-amplified and sequenced using pLI50-specific primers, which would not produce a PCR product if recombination had occurred between the oriT sites on each plasmid. In summary, these experiments confirmed that the region between smpN and smpO encompassed the pWBG749 oriT and that carriage of this oriT conferred the ability to be mobilised by pWBG749.

Table 1. Mobilisation of plasmids carrying cloned oriT fragments from pWBG749 and pWBG747.

Transfer frequencya
Plasmid name oriT source pWBG749e pLI50 clone
pLI50 Vector-only control 5.0 × 10−6 Not detected
1.3 × 10−5 Not detected
2.6 × 10−5 Not detected
pLI749a pWBG749 1.1 × 10−5 1.4 × 10−6
1.0 × 10−5 4.9 × 10−7
6.3 × 10−5 1.7 × 10−7
pLI749b pWBG749 1.3 × 10−5 3.1 × 10−7
3.3 × 10−5 2.1 × 10−7
8.7 × 10−5 1.0 × 10−7
pLI749d pWBG749 3.7 × 10−6 Not detected
4.9 × 10−5 Not detected
1.0 × 10−4 Not detected
pLI749e pWBG749 9.7 × 10−6 1.1 × 10−6
1.7 × 10−5 6.2 × 10−7
5.8 × 10−5 2.6 × 10−7
pLI749f pWBG749 2.5 × 10−5 Not detected
2.1 × 10−5 Not detected
1.4 × 10−4 Not detected
pLI747a pWBG747 1.1 × 10−5 1.4 × 10−7
1.0 × 10−5 6.0 × 10−7
8.9 × 10−6 8.0 × 10−8
pLI747b pWBG747 2.4 × 10−5 4.7 × 10−7
2.2 × 10−5 5.4 × 10−7
2.0 × 10−5 3.9 × 10−7
pLI747c pWBG747 8.4 × 10−6 6.0 × 10−7
2.3 × 10−5 3.7 × 10−7
2.0 × 10−5 1.9 × 10−7
pLI747d pWBG747 1.7 × 10−5 Not detected
1.8 × 10−5 Not detected
8.4 × 10−5 Not detected
pLI747e pWBG747 1.5 × 10−5 2.4 × 10−7
3.1 × 10−5 8.8 × 10−7
4.5 × 10−5 1.0 × 10−6
pLI747f pWBG747 2.1 × 10−5 Not detected
3.7 × 10−5 Not detected
1.9 × 10−5 Not detected

aPer-donor frequencies of individual mating experiments.

The minimal pWBG749 oriT region is conserved on diverse mobilisable plasmids and confers the ability to be mobilised

pWBG749 mobilises the transfer of several genetically distinct plasmids that lack identifiable Mob sequences (25). BLASTN searches of plasmid sequences of pWBG744, pWBG747, pWBG756, pWBG761 and pWBG762, revealed that they each carried a sequence sharing 85–86% nucleotide identity with pWBG749 oriT (Supplementary Figure S3). To investigate if the identified putative oriT sequences (designated ‘OT49’ subfamily oriT sequences; see explanation in following paragraphs) enabled mobilisation by pWBG749, the oriT sequence from each plasmid was cloned into pLI50 and the resulting constructs pLI744, pLI747, pLI762–49, pLI761a and pLI756b were used in mobilisation experiments. Each construct was capable of being mobilised by pWBG749e at a rate similar to that of pLI749a (Table 2). Next the minimal oriT regions of pWBG749 and pWBG747 were defined by cloning products of the oriT that each lacked one or more sequence motifs highlighted in Figure 1A. Clones lacking AR1 or AR2 were mobilised at rates similar to pLI749a, but transfer was undetectable from clones lacking all three AR repeats (Table 1). Comparison of the AR sequences (Supplementary Figure S3) carried by mobilisable plasmids revealed that only AR3 was strongly conserved, consistent with the non-essentiality of AR1 & AR2 for mobilisation. Clones lacking DNA downstream of the oriT core exhibited similar transfer rates to that of pLI749a, while clones lacking the oriT core were unable to be mobilised (Figure 1C and Table 1). In summary, these experiments confirmed that carriage of the ∼126-bp minimal oriT by diverse antimicrobial-resistance plasmids conferred their ability to be mobilised by pWBG749.

Table 2. pWBG749e-dependent mobilisation of oriT sequences cloned from diverse non-conjugative antimicrobial-resistance plasmids.

Transfer frequencya
Plasmid name Cloned oriT (group designation)b pWBG749e pLI50 clone
pLI744 pWBG744 (OT49_F) 6.9 × 10−5 6.4 × 10−7
pLI747 pWBG747 (OT49_M) 7.3 × 10−5 4.7 × 10−7
pLI762–49 pWBG762 (OT49_E) 7.3 × 10−5 1.5 × 10−6
pLI761a pWBG761 (OT49_G) 1.2 × 10−4 8.1 × 10−7
pLI756b pWBG756 (OT49_N) 6.8 × 10−5 2.8 × 10−7
pLI762–45 pWBG762 (OT45) 3.5 × 10−5 Not detected
pLI762-UNa pWBG762 (OTUNa) 6.4 × 10−5 Not detected
pLI50 7.9 × 10−5 Not detected

aTransfer frequencies are presented as per-donor frequencies and are the average of three experiments.

bSee text and Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S4 for explanation oriT group designations.

pWBG749-like oriT sequences are found on 53% of Staphylococcus aureus plasmid sequences

Identified oriT sequences (spanning from AR3 to the core) were used as queries in BLASTN searches against a database of 360 non-identical staphylococcal-plasmid sequences collected from GenBank (Supporting dataset S1). Of 280 S. aureus plasmids, 147 (53%) carried sequences resembling the pWBG749 oriT. These included the three most prevalent large (>20 kb) plasmid families: pMW2, pUSA300HOUMR and pIB485 (pWBG744) (Figure 2A). In a large-scale analysis of S. aureus plasmids isolated between 1940 and 2011, these three plasmid families represented 49% of all typed plasmids greater than 20 kb (5). In contrast only 9% of plasmids (7/80) isolated from other staphylococcal species carried the oriT sequence (Supporting dataset S1). oriT sequences were found on RCR plasmids (22 plasmids ranging from 2.8 to 4.4 kb) and larger theta-replicating plasmids (132 plasmids ranging from 14.6 to 57.9 kb). TBLASTN searches failed to identify ORFs with similarity to Mob (52) or Pre (53) relaxase genes on the oriT-carrying RCR plasmids. Intact Mob or Pre ORFs were identified on only four theta-replicating plasmids (pGO1, SAP016A, SAP106A and pPM1). This general absence of Mob/Pre genes on oriT-carrying plasmids is consistent with the proposed relaxase-in trans mechanism of pWBG749-mediated mobilisation. Of the larger oriT-carrying plasmids, 42 plasmids harboured two copies of the oriT sequence and 15 harboured three copies. Inspection of the BLASTN output of oriT-sequence queries revealed that plasmids encoding two oriT sequences invariably carried them on opposite DNA strands, while all plasmids encoding three oriT never carried all three on the same strand. In total, 229 sequences closely resembling the pWBG749 oriT were identified on 154 staphylococcal-plasmid sequences in the dataset.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Plasmids carrying pWBG749-family oriT sequences. (A) Diagrams of representatives of the three most prevalent families of large staphylococcal plasmids, pMW2, pUSA300HOUMR and pIB485 (5), showing the relative positions of resistance genes, replication genes and rep gene fragments, staphylococcal-enterotoxin genes and oriT sites (see key on left, colour coding is also applicable to part B). Please see text, Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S4 for explanation of oriT subfamily ‘OT’ designations: OT49, OT45 and OTUNa. (B) Diagrams of plasmids SAP047A and pNewbould305 (not to scale). pNewbould305 carries cadmium-resistance genes cadDX, a rep gene and an OT45-type oriT. The pNewbould305 sequence is >90% identical to a region on plasmid SAP047A, suggesting this region represents an integration of a pNewbould305-like plasmid (BLASTN comparison was made using BRIG (43)). (C) pWBG762 carries three oriT sequences and two cadDX loci as well as several rep gene fragments, suggesting multiple acquisitions of oriT-carrying cadmium-resistance RCR plasmids. The schematic illustrates the possible mechanism of the pWBG749-mediated deletion that occurred following conjugative mobilisation of pWBG762. Transfer presumably initiated at the OT45 site and terminated at the OT49 site.

oriT sequences identified on RCR plasmids were consistently located downstream of the replication genes (see Figure 2B for example), but the association was not specific to a single rep -gene family (pWBG1773, pACK5 and pPI-2 carry rep13-family, the remainder carry rep25 (11)). rep pseudogenes and gene fragments were also identified adjacent to oriT sequences on most theta-replicating plasmids (see Figure 2A for example), suggesting that acquisition of oriT sequences by larger plasmids had occurred through cointegration with RCR plasmids. A clear example of a cointegration event involved the 29-kb penicillinase and enterotoxin-encoding plasmid SAP047A, isolated from human synovial fluid isolate S. aureus SAP047 (5). SAP047A contained a region sharing >90% nucleotide identity with the cadmium-resistance and oriT-carrying RCR plasmid pNewbould305, from bovine mastitis strain S. aureus Newbould 305 (54) (Figure 2B). Cadmium-resistance loci cadDX and cadAC were also frequently encoded adjacent to oriT sequences on large plasmids (Figure 2). TBLASTN searches revealed that 79% (121/154) of oriT-encoding plasmids carried copies of either CadA (41/154) or CadD (100/154), compared to only 9% for plasmids not encoding an oriT (18/206). These observations strongly suggest that acquisition of oriT sequences by large S. aureus plasmids has occurred through integration of RCR plasmids carrying cadmium-resistance loci (similar to pNewbould305 (Figure 2B)) into larger antimicrobial-resistance and virulence-gene plasmids.

Whole-genome sequencing data for 397 clinical S. aureus isolates was recently released by the MRSA Orange County initiative of the Broad Institute (broadinstitute.org) (not included in plasmid database in Supporting dataset S1). BLASTN of this dataset using the pWBG749 sequence as a query identified 24 contigs with contiguous nucleotide similarity across the entire pWBG749 conjugation cluster (Supplementary Figure S1 and Supporting dataset S3). These putative pWBG749-family plasmids were carried by strains isolated from blood, wounds and sputum. Astonishingly, 736 copies of the oriT sequence were identified across all contigs for the 397 genomes. Thus pWBG749-like plasmids are present in a minority of clinical S. aureus isolates, but pWBG749-like oriT sequences appear to be abundant.

oriT sequences carry different IR2 sequences that correspond to distinct oriT sequences carried by five pWBG749-like conjugation-gene clusters

The observation that several plasmids carried multiple oriT sequences suggested that each oriT might be functionally distinct. Closer inspection revealed that when multiple oriT sequences were carried on a single plasmid they often contained different IR2 sequences. Sequence alignment of the region encompassing AR3, IR1, IR2, IR3 and the core was carried out for all oriT sequences identified in our plasmid database using T-coffee in rcoffee (RNA) mode, to account for ssDNA structural motifs (Supplementary Figure S4). Tree construction using PhyML (55) clustered the 53 unique oriT sequences into three major clades with >91% bootstrap support (Supplementary Figure S5). Subclades with lower bootstrap support were supported by a maximum credibility tree constructed using Markov Chain Monte Carlo software BEAST and TreeAnnotator using the same DNA alignment (not shown). Further inspection of the DNA sequence alignments within each clade revealed that there were at least five distinct IR2 sequence variants, while the repeat sequences of IR1, IR3 and the core were near-identical between all the sequences. Two of the distinct oriT IR2 variants (named OT49 and OT45) corresponded with IR2 motifs within oriT sequences on conjugative plasmids pWBG748/pWBG749 and pWBG745/pBRZ01, respectively, while a further three IR2 motifs matched oriT sequences located upstream of SmpO-gene homologues on pWBG749-like conjugation clusters found in the genome sequences of S. aureus M0408 (named OT408), S. epidermidis (named OTSep) and S. aureus W24216 (named OTUNa) (Figure 3A). Of the pWBG749-like contigs present in the Orange County MRSA dataset, 3 were OT49 and 21 were OT45 type, but OT49 oriT sites were five times more abundant than OT45 sites across the dataset (502 versus 100, (Supporting dataset S3)). OT45, OT49 and OTUNa all carried AR sites resembling those of pWBG749, while OTSep and OT408 oriT sites contained a different set of AR repeats in the same positions (Figure 3A). Interestingly, OTUNa sites were only identified on larger plasmids and in each case they were located directly upstream of a truncated copy of smpO, suggesting that acquisition of the OTUNa sites had occurred through direct capture of the oriT-smpO region from a conjugative plasmid.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Comparison of OT49, OT45, OTUNa, OTSep and OT408 pWBG749-subfamily oriT and SmpO sequences. (A) The intergenic regions upstream of smpO on pWBG749 and pWBG745 were aligned (using Clustal W (41)) with the corresponding oriT region identified in the shotgun genome sequence of S. aureus W24216 (GI:582299942). Corresponding regions on putative conjugation clusters identified in S. epidermidis VCU120 (GI:418616860) and S. aureus M0408 (GI:477787193) were aligned separately. AR and IR repeats are highlighted as in Figure 1. The consensus for AR, IR and core sequences are shown above each alignment. OTSep and OT408 AR sequences are distinct from those located on OT49, OT45 and OTUNa. Each oriT family has a distinct IR2 sequence highlighted in blue. (B) A T-coffee alignment (mcoffee mode) of the SmpO sequences identified on pWBG749-family conjugation clusters. Each SmpO gene is labelled by its corresponding ‘OT’ grouping. Completely conserved residues are shaded. The output of a PSIPRED secondary-structure prediction from the alignment of sequences is shown below (H = helix, C = coil, E = strand). The first half of each protein resembles the classical β-sheet-helix-helix structure of ribbon-helix-helix proteins.

Inspection of plasmids carrying multiple oriT sequences revealed that most did not carry copies from the same oriT subfamilies [58/67]. The most common configuration for plasmids carrying three oriT sequences was OT49/OT45/OTUNa [13/15], while for those carrying two oriT sequences it was OT49/OT45 [27/42]. Plasmids carrying the combinations OT45/OTUNa [7], OT49/OT49 [7] OTSep/OTUNa/OTUNa [1], OT45/OT49/OT49 [1], OTSep/OTUNa [1] and OTSep/OT408 [1] were also observed. Therefore, assuming oriT acquisition is a random process, most plasmids appear to have preferentially maintained or acquired oriT sequences of different subfamilies, further indicating that the oriT sites are not functionally equivalent.

smpO acts as an oriT subfamily specificity factor

Plasmids pWBG749 and pWBG745 are 99% identical over 93% of their nucleotide sequences (25), but carry oriT sequences from different subfamilies (OT49 and OT45, respectively) (Supplementary Figure S1 and Figure 3A). pMW2 and pWBG757 each carry a single OT45 oriT and are not mobilised by pWBG749 (25). pWBG762 carries three oriT sequences (OT49, OT45 and OTUNa) and a plasmid carrying the pWBG762 OT49 oriT (pLI762–49) was mobilised by pWBG749. The OTUNa and OT45 sites from pWBG762 and the oriT of pWBG745 were cloned into pLI50 and used in mobilisation experiments. Neither of the resultant clones were able to be mobilised by pWBG749e (Table 1) indicating that pWBG749 was not able to efficiently mobilise plasmids carrying OT45 or OTUNa oriT sites. This suggested that conjugative plasmids with different IR2 sequences, like pWBG749 and pWBG745, may only be able to mobilise plasmids carrying oriT sequences of the same subfamily, i.e. with matching IR2 sequences.

A comparison of the SmpP sequences of pWBG749 and pWBG745 revealed they differed by only 3 amino acids (out of 382). To investigate if the SmpP genes of pWBG749 and pWBG745 (smpP49 and smpP45, respectively) were responsible for the discrimination of OT49 and OT45 oriT sites by pWBG749, the oriT-smpO-smpP regions of both plasmids were cloned into pLI50, producing pKY9TOP and pKY5TOP. pWBG749 mobilised both these clones at rates similar to those of pLI749a, indicating that the presence of pWBG745-encoded smpO or smpP enabled pWBG749-mediated mobilisation of OT45 sites (Table 3). To test if the smpP genes were responsible for oriT specificity, the smpP gene of each clone was swapped, producing pKY9TO5P and pKY5TO9P. Both clones were mobilised at similar rates, clearly indicating SmpP was not the specificity factor required for discrimination between OT49 and OT45 oriT sites. Moreover, this result implied that it was the presence of pWBG745 smpO (smpO45) on pKY5TO9P that enabled mobilisation of the OT45 site by pWBG749. To test this hypothesis, a clone carrying only the oriT-smpO region of pWBG745 was constructed, producing pKY5TO. This clone was mobilised by pWBG749 at levels similar to pLI749a, confirming that the presence of pWBG745-encoded smpO enabled the mobilisation of the OT45 oriT sequence by pWBG749. Thus the SmpO proteins of pWBG749-family plasmids likely act as specificity factors for the oriT, possibly through direct recognition of the IR2 sequence. A comparison of the SmpO sequences encoded on pWBG749 and pWBG745 revealed that they shared 86% amino-acid identity and have diverged mostly in their N-terminal regions (predicted β-sheet region) (Figure 3B).

Table 3. Mobilisation of an OT45 oriT by pWBG749e.

Transfer frequencya
Plasmid name Cloned oriT (OT group designation)b Additional genes clonedc pWBG749e pLI50 clone
pLI749a pWBG749 (OT49) 4.0 × 10−5 3.9 × 10−6
pKY9TOP pWBG749 (OT49) smpO49smpP49 1.7 × 10−5 2.1 × 10−6
pKY9TO5P pWBG749 (OT49) smpO49smpP45 2.3 × 10−5 2.8 × 10−6
pKY5T pWBG745 (OT45) 2.4 × 10−5 Not detected
pKY5TOP pWBG745 (OT45) smpO45smpP45 1.5 × 10−5 8.5 × 10−6
pKY5TO9P pWBG745 (OT45) smpO45smpP49 2.4 × 10−5 9.0 × 10−6
pKY5TO pWBG745 (OT45) smpO45 1.3 × 10−5 6.6 × 10−6
pLI50 empty vector 2.3 × 10−5 Not detected

aAll transfer frequencies are presented as per-donor frequencies and are the average of three experiments.

bSee text, Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S4 for explanation oriT group designations.

cSubscript ‘49’ refers to genes cloned from pWBG749, subscript ‘45’ refers to genes cloned from pWBG745.

pWBG749 stimulates recombination between OT49 and OT45 core sites

Relaxase-mediated recombination between same-strand oriT sequences has been documented for plasmids and integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs) (53,5661). Relaxase cleavage at the first oriT and ligation with the second oriT, produces a deletion of DNA outside the transferred region, delineated by the oriT core site. In our analysis of plasmids carrying multiple oriT sequences, we observed a complete absence of same-strand oriT sequences on plasmids carrying two oriT sequences. Because of this bias we suspected that relaxase-mediated deletion of DNA between same-strand encoded oriT pairs might have removed many same-strand oriT pairs from the plasmid population. Analysis of the mobilisable plasmid pWBG762 revealed it carried 3 oriT sites and that the OT49 and OT45 sites were located on the same strand. pWBG762 DNA was isolated from 11 exconjugants following mobilisation by pWBG749e (25). Restriction analysis revealed that one of the eleven exconjugants carried a pWBG762 plasmid with a unique EcoRI restriction pattern and an apparent size of 35.9 kb, rather than the expected 54.0 kb (Supplementary Figure S6). The size reduction in pWBG762 was consistent with a deletion between the OT45 and OT49 oriT sites. Primers flanking the OT45 and OT49 sites successfully amplified the predicted deletion site. Sequencing confirmed recombination had occurred between the oriT core sites of the OT49 and OT45 oriT sequences, leading to a deletion of the intervening DNA (including the OTUNa site) (Supplementary Figure S6). The nucleotide polymorphisms between the OT45 and OT49 oriT sequences (Supplementary Figure S6) and mobilisation experiments with truncated oriT sequence clones (Figure 1), together delineated the relaxase nic site to be within a 16-bp sequence (5′-CCTTATGCTCTTACGG-3′) containing the 11-bp sequence conserved on divergent plasmids carrying MOBMG-family Mob proteins (Figure 1B and Supplementary Figure S6).

DISCUSSION

It is well established that conjugative plasmids can mobilise plasmids that are not self-transmissible, but the vast majority of documented mobilisable plasmids encode distinct Mob protein(s) and carry distinct oriT (17). The Mob proteins of mobilisable plasmids are able to exploit the T4SS encoded by conjugative plasmids through interaction with the VirD4/TraG coupling-protein component of the mating pore (62,63). In this study we confirmed that pWBG749 is capable of mobilising plasmids that lack Mob genes and that this ability is due to these mobilisable plasmids carrying oriT sites that resemble that of pWBG749. This indicates that the pWBG749 relaxasome acts in trans on antimicrobial-resistance plasmids and mobilises their recruitment to the mating pore. Most importantly, oriT sequences resembling that of pWBG749 were found on most S. aureus plasmids including all three of the most prevalent large S. aureus antimicrobial-resistance plasmids, pIB485, pMW2 and pUSA300HOUMR (5). This supports the hypothesis that this relaxase-in trans mechanism is a dominant mechanism of plasmid mobilisation in S. aureus. It is notable that the recently emerged vancomycin-resistant strain BR-VRSA (9,64), as well as carrying the pWBG749-family conjugative vancomycin-resistance plasmid pBRZ01, also carries a plasmid almost identical to pMW2 (pHMPREF1625_1, GI:618846309). Since both plasmids carry an OT45 subfamily oriT, we would predict that pBRZ01 mobilised the transfer of the pMW2 plasmid into this strain background during evolution of BR-VRSA and that BR-VRSA is capable as acting as a conjugative donor of pMW2.

The pWBG749 oriT sequence was initially identified through the comparison of MOBMG conjugative plasmids pMC189, pGL5, pMG2200 and pHTβ (4548). The oriT sequences, despite having little sequence similarity, are all predicted to form a branched hairpin structure, suggesting this is a conserved structural feature of the cognate oriT sequences of MOBMG Mob proteins. Mob relaxases bind DNA hairpin structures adjacent to the oriT core and these hairpins have roles in recognition, replication and plasmid recircularisation (6569). pWBG749-family plasmids have diverged into five distinct subfamilies, each carrying a different IR2 variant of the oriT. pWBG749 was unable to mobilise plasmids carrying OT45 or OTUNa oriT sequences, but pWBG749 mobilisation of an OT45 oriT-carrying construct was enabled in the presence of the pWBG745-encoded smpO. This suggested that SmpO acts as a specificity factor for the oriT, possibly through binding the IR2 sequence. Comparison of the SmpO proteins of pWBG749 and pWBG745 revealed that unlike their near-identical SmpP proteins, their SmpO proteins have diverged more significantly in their N-terminal sequence (Figure 3B). Secondary-structure prediction for the SmpO proteins indicates their N-terminal half contains a sheet-helix-helix structure and database PSI-BLAST searches retrieve weak hits to the ribbon-helix-helix (RHH) family of DNA-binding proteins. RHH proteins have been previously associated with relaxasomes and regulation of conjugative transfer (7072). The N-terminal regions of RHH protein dimers form an antiparallel β-sheet that fits into the major groove of the DNA and the N-terminal sequence contributes almost exclusively to the decoding of the DNA-binding site (73). Therefore the sequence divergence within this region for the SmpO proteins of pWBG749 and pWBG745 fits with their differential oriT specificity. Interestingly, apart from the region encompassing oriT–smpO, pWBG745 and pWBG749 are almost identical at the nucleotide level within the predicted conjugation cluster (Supplementary Figure S1). This might suggest that the oriT-smpO region of pWBG745 (or conversely pWBG749) may have been recently acquired, enabling the evolved plasmid to recognise OT45 sites or avoid exploitation by non-conjugative plasmids carrying OT49 sites. In contrast, the S. aureus W24216 SmpO sequence shows only 49% and 46% amino-acid identity to SmpO genes of pWBG749 and pWBG745 (respectively), despite being encoded downstream of an OTUNa oriT sequence that closely resembles OT45 (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S4). Regardless of the evolutionary reasons for this divergence in oriT specificity, the observation that several plasmids have captured multiple oriT sequences from these different subfamilies implies that they have benefited from mobilisation by pWBG749-family plasmids capable of mobilising each oriT subfamily during their evolutionary history.

pWBG749 was unable to mobilise OT45 sites in the absence of pWBG745 smpO (Table 3), but it was able to stimulate recombination between OT45 and OT49 sites on pWBG762 during mobilisation (Figure 2C and Supplementary Figure S6). During conjugation, Mob relaxases are covalently attached to the 5′ phosphate on the nicked DNA strand such that ssDNA downstream of the oriT core is piloted through the T4SS by the relaxase. RCR replaces the displaced ssDNA, after which a Mob molecule mediates a second cleavage at the reconstituted oriT site (16). The relative orientation of the OT45 and OT49 sites on pWBG762 and the subsequent deletion that occurred following transfer, indicates transfer initiated at the OT45 site and terminated at the OT49 site. Initially this appears to conflict with our previous observation that pWBG749 could not mobilise OT45 sites in the absence of pWBG745 smpO. This indicates that recognition of IR2 is not strictly essential for recognition and cleavage by the SmpP relaxase. For the plasmid R388 relaxase TrwC, only the oriT core sequence is strictly required for recognition and cleavage, but the hairpin sequence 5′ adjacent to the core is required for TrwC binding on a ssDNA target and is essential for efficient transfer (74). It is possible that recognition of IR2 by SmpO/SmpP is only strictly required for termination of rolling-circle replication or plasmid recircularisation. If this is the case then pWBG749 family plasmids may have an ability to initiate transfer or facilitate recombination of any plasmid that carries the conserved MOBMG oriT core site identified in this study.

A curious observation in our analyses of the oriT sequences was their genetic linkage to cadmium-resistance loci and RCR-Rep genes. Comparisons between plasmids like pNewbould305 and larger oriT-carrying plasmids such as SAP047A reveal a clear cointegration event between the ancestors of these plasmids, tentatively explaining the association of oriT sequences with RCR Rep genes (Figure 2). From inspection of plasmids pIB485 and pWBG762, it seems that the process of plasmid cointegration has occurred repeatedly during evolution (Figure 2). For these examples it is unclear if this process reflects selection for heavy-metal resistance or an ability to be mobilised by multiple pWBG749-like plasmids, or perhaps both. There was a clear exception to this genetic linkage between cadmium-resistance loci and oriT sequences: The OTUNa oriT sequences were not frequently located adjacent to cadmium-resistance loci, but were all located adjacent to an smpO pseudogene. This suggests that this sequence was obtained directly through recombination with a conjugative plasmid and supports the hypothesis that oriT sequences have been the focus of selection, at least in this case.

Despite the resounding genetic footprints left by plasmids of the pWBG749 family in the form of oriT sequences, there is a paucity of pWBG749-like plasmids and pGO1/pSK41 plasmids in sequence databases (5). The lack of conjugation genes in extant S. aureus genomes seems to imply that conjugation events are rare or that most apparent horizontal gene transfer events may have occurred ancestrally. Indeed, the prevalent pIB485 family of plasmids, which carries OT49, OT45 and OTUNa sites, existed in its present form prior to 1949 (5), indicating selection for capture of oriT sequences and mobilisation by pWBG749-like plasmids occurred prior to the widespread of use of antimicrobials. Nevertheless, pWBG749-family plasmids are extant in S. aureus populations and oriT sequences are abundant, as revealed by our analysis of the Orange County dataset. We speculate that conjugative plasmids may be more prevalent in S. aureus populations than is reflected by current sequence data, possibly due to biases inherent in the sequencing of disease-causing isolates. Clinical isolates have likely experienced population bottlenecks, periods of diversification and rapid clonal expansion during infection and antimicrobial treatment (75,76). The fitness cost of conjugative-plasmid carriage (22), coupled with a lack of direct selection for their maintenance may have led to loss of pWBG749 plasmids in the most prevalent pathogenic isolates. While antimicrobial-resistance carrying derivatives of pWBG749 and pWBG745 have been identified (pWBG748 (25) and pBRZ01 (9), respectively), these are an exception. Of the 24 pWBG749-family contigs detected in the MRSA Orange County sample, genetic determinants for aminoglycoside, macrolide and vancomycin resistance were not detected and only one contig (LAMC0050) carried genes for β-lactamase production (Supporting dataset S3). It is of note, that unlike pBRZ01, plasmids pWBG745, pWBG748 and pWBG749 were found in CA-MRSA strains isolated from asymptomatic carriers, demonstrating that healthy individuals can be reservoirs of pWBG749-family plasmids.

It is clear from the abundance of pWBG749-like oriT sequences that the in trans mechanism of mobilisation is a dominant mechanism of mobilisation in S. aureus. So why is there such a paucity of evidence for this mechanism in other species? One explanation may be that the relaxase-in trans mechanism is relatively less efficient than the relaxase-in cis mechanism. The well-characterised plasmid family pSK41/pGO1 conjugates to recipients at a frequency of 10−5–10−7 per donor (10) and relaxase-in cis mobilisation by pSK41/pGO1 occurs at similar or slightly lower rates, depending on the particular mobilisable plasmid (52,77). In contrast, while pWBG749 and pBRZ01 transfer at a higher average frequency than pSK41 at 10−4–10−5 (9,25), the mobilisation rate via the relaxase-in trans mechanism is on average only ∼1% of the conjugation frequency of pWBG749. Even a cloned copy of the cognate pWBG749 oriT (on pLI749a) facilitates mobilisation at only 2.5% of the rate of pWBG749 (Figure 1C). A strong cis-acting preference of a conjugative plasmid's relaxase for its oriT has been observed for some rhizobial plasmids (78,79), so this effect is not unique to pWBG749. Given that the relaxase-in trans mechanism may be less efficient than the relaxase-in cis mechanism, the higher rate of conjugative transfer observed for pWBG749 may raise the relative mobilisation rate to within evolutionarily significant levels. Alternatively, the relaxase-in trans mechanism may be more widespread than is currently appreciated, but due to mechanistic preconceptions of mobilisation (17), investigators may have not anticipated the possibility. The relaxase-in trans mechanism of mobilisation has been documented for the mobilisation of non-conjugative genomic islands and cryptic chromosomal oriT sites by ICEs (27) and plasmids (29,32). Mobilisation of lactococcal plasmids pS7a and pS7b occurs with the help of a helper plasmid pS80, which carries a similar oriT sequence and presumably encodes a Mob protein compatible with pS7a and pS7b (30). Additionally a distinct mechanism of mobilisation has been described for Bacillus subtilis plasmids, which likely involves interactions between plasmid RCR-Rep proteins and the ICEBs1-encoded T4SS (28). Thus our current appreciation of the variety of mechanisms that facilitate mobilisation of mobile genetic elements is far from comprehensive.

Further investigation into the pWBG749 relaxase-in trans mechanism of mobilisation will undoubtedly progress our understanding of the molecular biology, evolution and epidemiology of plasmid transfer in S. aureus and other bacteria. The wide prevalence and sequence diversity of pWBG749-like oriT sequences and the intramolecular recombination of non-identical oriT sequences presents itself as a natural and genetically tractable platform from which to tease apart the roles of oriT sequence moieties required for DNA recognition, binding, cleavage, replication and termination of plasmid transfer. From the perspective of molecular evolution and epidemiology, the ability to identify which specific pWBG749-family plasmid mobilises each plasmid based on oriT-subfamily type may enable reconstruction of the evolutionary events leading to the emergence of pathogenic strains. In summary, further characterisation of both the mobilisation mechanisms and the epidemiology of pWBG749-family plasmids will undoubtedly expand our understanding of horizontal gene transfer in S. aureus and in bacteria in general.

Supplementary Material

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Acknowledgments

The Curtin University MBID332 2013 student cohort is thanked for construction of four of the clones presented in Table 1. J.P.R. thanks the Curtin University Faculty of Health Sciences for funding work carried out by K.Y.E. and R.J.T.M. and the Curtin University CHIRI Biosciences Precinct facility for technical support. Clive W. Ronson and Michael F. Hynes are thanked for helpful discussions and suggestions.

Footnotes

Present address: Joshua Ramsay, CHIRI Biosciences Precinct, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley WA 6102, Australia.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.

FUNDING

Funding for open access charge: School of Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wertheim H.F., Melles D.C., Vos M.C., van Leeuwen W., van Belkum A., Verbrugh H.A., Nouwen J.L. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2005;5:751–762. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70295-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.O'Brien F.G., Coombs G.W., Pearman J.W., Gracey M., Moss F., Christiansen K.J., Grubb W.B. Population dynamics of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus in remote communities. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009;64:684–693. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hiramatsu K., Ito T., Tsubakishita S., Sasaki T., Takeuchi F., Morimoto Y., Katayama Y., Matsuo M., Kuwahara-Arai K., Hishinuma T., et al. Genomic Basis for Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Chemother. 2013;45:117–136. doi: 10.3947/ic.2013.45.2.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Deghorain M., Van Melderen L. The Staphylococci phages family: an overview. Viruses. 2012;4:3316–3335. doi: 10.3390/v4123316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shearer J.E., Wireman J., Hostetler J., Forberger H., Borman J., Gill J., Sanchez S., Mankin A., Lamarre J., Lindsay J.A., et al. Major families of multiresistant plasmids from geographically and epidemiologically diverse staphylococci. G3. 2011;1:581–591. doi: 10.1534/g3.111.000760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Malachowa N., DeLeo F.R. Mobile genetic elements of Staphylococcus aureus. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010;67:3057–3071. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0389-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jensen S.O., Lyon B.R. Genetics of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Future Microbiol. 2009;4:565–582. doi: 10.2217/fmb.09.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gardete S., Tomasz A. Mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Invest. 2014;124:2836–2840. doi: 10.1172/JCI68834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rossi F., Diaz L., Wollam A., Panesso D., Zhou Y., Rincon S., Narechania A., Xing G., Di Gioia T.S., Doi A., et al. Transferable vancomycin resistance in a community-associated MRSA lineage. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:1524–1531. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu M.A., Kwong S.M., Jensen S.O., Brzoska A.J., Firth N. Biology of the staphylococcal conjugative multiresistance plasmid pSK41. Plasmid. 2013;70:42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McCarthy A.J., Lindsay J.A. The distribution of plasmids that carry virulence and resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus is lineage associated. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chua K.Y., Seemann T., Harrison P.F., Monagle S., Korman T.M., Johnson P.D., Coombs G.W., Howden B.O., Davies J.K., Howden B.P., et al. The dominant Australian community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone ST93-IV [2B] is highly virulent and genetically distinct. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baba T., Takeuchi F., Kuroda M., Yuzawa H., Aoki K., Oguchi A., Nagai Y., Iwama N., Asano K., Naimi T., et al. Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA. Lancet. 2002;359:1819–1827. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08713-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Low H.H., Gubellini F., Rivera-Calzada A., Braun N., Connery S., Dujeancourt A., Lu F., Redzej A., Fronzes R., Orlova E.V., et al. Structure of a type IV secretion system. Nature. 2014;508:550–553. doi: 10.1038/nature13081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Goessweiner-Mohr N., Arends K., Keller W., Grohmann E. Conjugative type IV secretion systems in Gram-positive bacteria. Plasmid. 2013;70:289–302. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2013.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chandler M., de la Cruz F., Dyda F., Hickman A.B., Moncalian G., Ton-Hoang B. Breaking and joining single-stranded DNA: the HUH endonuclease superfamily. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013;11:525–538. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smillie C., Garcillan-Barcia M.P., Francia M.V., Rocha E.P., de la Cruz F. Mobility of plasmids. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2010;74:434–452. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00020-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Caryl J.A., Thomas C.D. Investigating the basis of substrate recognition in the pC221 relaxosome. Mol. Microbiol. 2006;60:1302–1318. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05188.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Apisiridej S., Leelaporn A., Scaramuzzi C.D., Skurray R.A., Firth N. Molecular analysis of a mobilizable theta-mode trimethoprim resistance plasmid from coagulase-negative staphylococci. Plasmid. 1997;38:13–24. doi: 10.1006/plas.1997.1292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alvarado A., Garcillan-Barcia M.P., de la Cruz F. A degenerate primer MOB typing (DPMT) method to classify gamma-proteobacterial plasmids in clinical and environmental settings. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.San Millan A., Pena-Miller R., Toll-Riera M., Halbert Z.V., McLean A.R., Cooper B.S., MacLean R.C. Positive selection and compensatory adaptation interact to stabilize non-transmissible plasmids. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5208. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bergstrom C.T., Lipsitch M., Levin B.R. Natural selection, infectious transfer and the existence conditions for bacterial plasmids. Genetics. 2000;155:1505–1519. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.4.1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lili L.N., Britton N.F., Feil E.J. The persistence of parasitic plasmids. Genetics. 2007;177:399–405. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.077420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Krone S.M., Lu R., Fox R., Suzuki H., Top E.M. Modelling the spatial dynamics of plasmid transfer and persistence. Microbiology. 2007;153:2803–2816. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/004531-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.O'Brien F.G., Ramsay J.P., Monecke S., Coombs G.W., Robinson O.J., Htet Z., Alshaikh F.A.M., Grubb W.B. Staphylococcus aureus plasmids without mobilization genes are mobilized by a novel conjugative plasmid from community isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015;70:649–652. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Simon R., Priefer U., Puhler A. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in gram negative bacteria. Nat. Biotechnol. 1983;1:784–791. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Daccord A., Ceccarelli D., Burrus V. Integrating conjugative elements of the SXT/R391 family trigger the excision and drive the mobilization of a new class of Vibrio genomic islands. Mol. Microbiol. 2010;78:576–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07364.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee C.A., Thomas J., Grossman A.D. The Bacillus subtilis conjugative transposon ICEBs1 mobilizes plasmids lacking dedicated mobilization functions. J. Bacteriol. 2012;194:3165–3172. doi: 10.1128/JB.00301-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Meyer R. The r1162 mob proteins can promote conjugative transfer from cryptic origins in the bacterial chromosome. J. Bacteriol. 2009;191:1574–1580. doi: 10.1128/JB.01471-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Strahinic I., Kojic M., Tolinacki M., Fira D., Topisirovic L. Molecular characterization of plasmids pS7a and pS7b from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis bv. diacetylactis S50 as a base for the construction of mobilizable cloning vectors. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009;106:78–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03977.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dery K.J., Chavideh R., Waters V., Chamorro R., Tolmasky L.S., Tolmasky M.E. Characterization of the replication and mobilization regions of the multiresistance Klebsiella pneumoniae plasmid pJHCMW1. Plasmid. 1997;38:97–105. doi: 10.1006/plas.1997.1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jaworski D.D., Clewell D.B. A functional origin of transfer (oriT) on the conjugative transposon Tn916. J. Bacteriol. 1995;177:6644–6651. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.22.6644-6651.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Townsend D.E., Ashdown N., Bolton S., Grubb W.B. The use of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide for the isolation from Staphylococcus aureus of relaxable and non-relaxable plasmid DNA for in vitro manipulation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1985;1:207–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schenk S., Laddaga R.A. Improved method for electroporation of Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1992;73:133–138. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(92)90596-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Townsend D.E., Bolton S., Ashdown N., Grubb W.B. Transfer of plasmid-borne aminoglycoside-resistance determinants in staphylococci. J. Med. Microbiol. 1985;20:169–185. doi: 10.1099/00222615-20-2-169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Camacho C., Coulouris G., Avagyan V., Ma N., Papadopoulos J., Bealer K., Madden T.L. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3406–3415. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Darty K., Denise A., Ponty Y. VARNA: Interactive drawing and editing of the RNA secondary structure. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1974–1975. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Notredame C., Higgins D.G., Heringa J. T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 2000;302:205–217. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wilm A., Higgins D.G., Notredame C. R-Coffee: a method for multiple alignment of non-coding RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:e52. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Larkin M.A., Blackshields G., Brown N.P., Chenna R., McGettigan P.A., McWilliam H., Valentin F., Wallace I.M., Wilm A., Lopez R., et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–2948. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Waterhouse A.M., Procter J.B., Martin D.M., Clamp M., Barton G.J. Jalview Version 2–a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1189–1191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Alikhan N.F., Petty N.K., Ben Zakour N.L., Beatson S.A. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Drummond A.J., Suchard M.A., Xie D., Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012;29:1969–1973. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Aguado-Urda M., Gibello A., Blanco M.M., Lopez-Campos G.H., Cutuli M.T., Fernandez-Garayzabal J.F. Characterization of plasmids in a human clinical strain of Lactococcus garvieae. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zheng B., Tomita H., Inoue T., Ike Y. Isolation of VanB-type Enterococcus faecalis strains from nosocomial infections: first report of the isolation and identification of the pheromone-responsive plasmids pMG2200, Encoding VanB-type vancomycin resistance and a Bac41-type bacteriocin, and pMG2201, encoding erythromycin resistance and cytolysin (Hly/Bac) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009;53:735–747. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00754-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Guan P., Ai P., Dai X., Zhang J., Xu L., Zhu J., Li Q., Deng Q., Li S., Wang S., et al. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar Sichuansis strain MC28. J. Bacteriol. 2012;194:6975. doi: 10.1128/JB.01861-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tomita H., Ike Y. Genetic analysis of transfer-related regions of the vancomycin resistance Enterococcus conjugative plasmid pHTbeta: identification of oriT and a putative relaxase gene. J. Bacteriol. 2005;187:7727–7737. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.22.7727-7737.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Guglielmini J., de la Cruz F., Rocha E.P. Evolution of conjugation and type IV secretion systems. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:315–331. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Parker C., Becker E., Zhang X., Jandle S., Meyer R. Elements in the co-evolution of relaxases and their origins of transfer. Plasmid. 2005;53:113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2004.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lee C.Y., Buranen S.L., Ye Z.H. Construction of single-copy integration vectors for Staphylococcus aureus. Gene. 1991;103:101–105. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90399-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Projan S.J., Archer G.L. Mobilization of the relaxable Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pC221 by the conjugative plasmid pGO1 involves three pC221 loci. J. Bacteriol. 1989;171:1841–1845. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.4.1841-1845.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gennaro M.L., Kornblum J., Novick R.P. A site-specific recombination function in Staphylococcus aureus plasmids. J. Bacteriol. 1987;169:2601–2610. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.6.2601-2610.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bouchard D., Peton V., Almeida S., Le Marechal C., Miyoshi A., Azevedo V., Berkova N., Rault L., Francois P., Schrenzel J., et al. Genome sequence of Staphylococcus aureus Newbould 305, a strain associated with mild bovine mastitis. J. Bacteriol. 2012;194:6292–6293. doi: 10.1128/JB.01188-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dereeper A., Guignon V., Blanc G., Audic S., Buffet S., Chevenet F., Dufayard J.F., Guindon S., Lefort V., Lescot M., et al. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W465–W469. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang P., Zhang C., Zhu Y., Deng Y., Guo S., Peng D., Ruan L., Sun M. The resolution and regeneration of a cointegrate plasmid reveals a model for plasmid evolution mediated by conjugation and oriT site-specific recombination. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;15:3305–3318. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Burrus V., Waldor M.K. Formation of SXT tandem arrays and SXT-R391 hybrids. J. Bacteriol. 2004;186:2636–2645. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.9.2636-2645.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Barlett M.M., Erickson M.J., Meyer R.J. Recombination between directly repeated origins of conjugative transfer cloned in M13 bacteriophage DNA models ligation of the transferred plasmid strand. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:3579–3586. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.12.3579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cesar C.E., Llosa M. TrwC-mediated site-specific recombination is controlled by host factors altering local DNA topology. J. Bacteriol. 2007;189:9037–9043. doi: 10.1128/JB.01152-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Furuya N., Komano T. Initiation and termination of DNA transfer during conjugation of IncI1 plasmid R64: roles of two sets of inverted repeat sequences within oriT in termination of R64 transfer. J. Bacteriol. 2000;182:3191–3196. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.11.3191-3196.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Furuya N., Komano T. NikAB- or NikB-dependent intracellular recombination between tandemly repeated oriT sequences of plasmid R64 in plasmid or single-stranded phage vectors. J. Bacteriol. 2003;185:3871–3877. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.13.3871-3877.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cabezon E., Sastre J.I., de la Cruz F. Genetic evidence of a coupling role for the TraG protein family in bacterial conjugation. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1997;254:400–406. doi: 10.1007/s004380050432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hamilton C.M., Lee H., Li P.L., Cook D.M., Piper K.R., von Bodman S.B., Lanka E., Ream W., Farrand S.K. TraG from RP4 and TraG and VirD4 from Ti plasmids confer relaxosome specificity to the conjugal transfer system of pTiC58. J. Bacteriol. 2000;182:1541–1548. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.6.1541-1548.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Thurlow L.R., Joshi G.S., Richardson A.R. Virulence strategies of the dominant USA300 lineage of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2012;65:5–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00937.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Edwards J.S., Betts L., Frazier M.L., Pollet R.M., Kwong S.M., Walton W.G., Ballentine W.K. 3rd, Huang J.J., Habibi S., Del Campo M., et al. Molecular basis of antibiotic multiresistance transfer in Staphylococcus aureus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013;110:2804–2809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219701110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Nash R.P., Habibi S., Cheng Y., Lujan S.A., Redinbo M.R. The mechanism and control of DNA transfer by the conjugative relaxase of resistance plasmid pCU1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:5929–5943. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Boer R., Russi S., Guasch A., Lucas M., Blanco A.G., Perez-Luque R., Coll M., de la Cruz F. Unveiling the molecular mechanism of a conjugative relaxase: The structure of TrwC complexed with a 27-mer DNA comprising the recognition hairpin and the cleavage site. J. Mol. Biol. 2006;358:857–869. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Stern J.C., Anderson B.J., Owens T.J., Schildbach J.F. Energetics of the sequence-specific binding of single-stranded DNA by the F factor relaxase domain. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:29155–29159. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402965200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hekman K., Guja K., Larkin C., Schildbach J.F. An intrastrand three-DNA-base interaction is a key specificity determinant of F transfer initiation and of F TraI relaxase DNA recognition and cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:4565–4572. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Moncalian G., de la Cruz F. DNA binding properties of protein TrwA, a possible structural variant of the Arc repressor superfamily. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2004;1701:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2004.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Schildbach J.F., Robinson C.R., Sauer R.T. Biophysical characterization of the TraY protein of Escherichia coli F factor. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:1329–1333. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.3.1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Peng Y., Lu J., Wong J.J., Edwards R.A., Frost L.S., Mark Glover J.N. Mechanistic basis of plasmid-specific DNA binding of the F plasmid regulatory protein, TraM. J Mol Biol. 2014;426:3783–3795. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Schreiter E.R., Drennan C.L. Ribbon-helix-helix transcription factors: variations on a theme. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007;5:710–720. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lucas M., Gonzalez-Perez B., Cabezas M., Moncalian G., Rivas G., de la Cruz F. Relaxase DNA binding and cleavage are two distinguishable steps in conjugative DNA processing that involve different sequence elements of the nic site. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:8918–8926. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.057539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.McVicker G., Prajsnar T.K., Williams A., Wagner N.L., Boots M., Renshaw S.A., Foster S.J. Clonal expansion during Staphylococcus aureus infection dynamics reveals the effect of antibiotic intervention. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003959. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Worby C.J., Lipsitch M., Hanage W.P. Within-host bacterial diversity hinders accurate reconstruction of transmission networks from genomic distance data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014;10:e1003549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Varella Coelho M.L., Ceotto H., Madureira D.J., Nes I.F., Bastos Mdo C. Mobilization functions of the bacteriocinogenic plasmid pRJ6 of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Microbiol. 2009;47:327–336. doi: 10.1007/s12275-009-0044-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Perez-Mendoza D., Lucas M., Munoz S., Herrera-Cervera J.A., Olivares J., de la Cruz F., Sanjuan J. The relaxase of the Rhizobium etli symbiotic plasmid shows nic site cis-acting preference. J. Bacteriol. 2006;188:7488–7499. doi: 10.1128/JB.00701-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Blanca-Ordonez H., Oliva-Garcia J.J., Perez-Mendoza D., Soto M.J., Olivares J., Sanjuan J., Nogales J. pSymA-dependent mobilization of the Sinorhizobium meliloti pSymB megaplasmid. J. Bacteriol. 2010;192:6309–6312. doi: 10.1128/JB.00549-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES