Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 26;112(45):13823–13826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502280112

Table S4.

Similarity in the wording of negative vs. objective citations within a section, and of negative citations in different sections

X Y Type of comparison Mean cosine similarity SD cosine similarity No. of pairs
Introduction (Random sample) Negative vs. objective 0.070 0.038 7,072,500
Materials and Methods (Full sample) Negative vs. objective 0.060 0.041 2,180,768
Other (Full sample) Negative vs. objective 0.066 0.038 327,120
Results and Discussion (Random sample) Negative vs. objective 0.072 0.040 53,448,904
Introduction Materials and Methods Negative vs. negative 0.084 0.042 18,837
Introduction Other Negative vs. negative 0.086 0.039 47,502
Introduction Results and Discussion Negative vs. negative 0.090 0.041 6,536,439
Materials and Methods Introduction Negative vs. negative 0.084 0.042 18,860
Materials and Methods Other Negative vs. negative 0.083 0.043 1,334
Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Negative vs. negative 0.093 0.048 183,563
Other Introduction Negative vs. negative 0.086 0.039 47,560
Other Materials and Methods Negative vs. negative 0.083 0.043 1,334
Other Results and Discussion Negative vs. negative 0.090 0.042 462,898
Results and Discussion Introduction Negative vs. negative 0.090 0.041 6,542,780
Results and Discussion Materials and Methods Negative vs. negative 0.093 0.048 183,517
Results and Discussion Other Negative vs. negative 0.090 0.042 462,782