Table 2.
Intervention (n = 23) | Control (n = 21) | Adjusted change 0 to 4 week (95 % CI)b | Adjusted change 0 to 8 week (95 % CI)b | Probability (%) the true effect is beneficial / trivial / harmful | Qualitative inference (8 week) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(minutes/8-hour workday) | Baseline | 4 week | 8 week | Baseline | 4 week | 8 week | ||||
Sitting time | 385.9 (57.6) | 299.2 (93.4) | 322.0 (99.3) | 387.0 (41.0) | 387.5 (78.0) | 402.2 (47.9) | −87.6 (−136.8 to −38.3)* | −80.2 (−129.0 to −31.4) * | 79/21/0 | Benefit likely |
Standing time | 41.1 (35.0) | 141.1 (98.0) | 115.4 (111.6) | 42.5 (26.0) | 61.0 (76.2) | 43.7 (50.2) | 82.2 (36.5 to 127.8)* | 72.9 (21.2 to 124.6)* | 69/31/0 | Benefit possible |
Walking time | 53.0 (41.2) | 39.7 (33.4) | 42.6 (42.3) | 50.5 (24.2) | 31.4 (24.4) | 34.0 (29.1) | 7.3 (−8.7 to 23.2) | 7.1 (−12.1 to 26.3) | 38/58/4 | Possibly trivial |
aBaseline, 4- and 8-week values are unadjusted mean (SD)
bChange scores and 95 % CIs are the differences between groups (relative to control) after adjustment by ANCOVA for the baseline value
*Significant (p <0.05)