Table 3.
Relative abundance of dominant genera detected at the end of the biotest in RD soils of Kle and Alv affected by soil treatments.
| Phylum | Genus | Kle |
Alv |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con | H50 | Gamma | Con | H50 | Gamma | ||
| Acidobacteria | Gp1 | 3.9 ± 0a | 3.5 ± 0a | 1.7 ± 0b | 3.4 ± 1 | 3.3 ± 1 | 2.9 ± 1 |
| Gp2 | 1.8 ± 0a | 0.9 ± 0b | 0.4 ± 0c | 1.8 ± 1a | 0.6 ± 0b | 0.7 ± 0b | |
| Gp3 | 3.7 ± 0a | 2.2 ± 0b | 1.2 ± 0c | 3 ± 1a | 2.1 ± 1b | 1.3 ± 0c | |
| Gp4 | 0.8 ± 0a | 0.6 ± 0ab | 0.4 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0 | 0.2 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | |
| Gp5 | 0.3 ± 0a | 0 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0 | 0.1 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | |
| Gp6 | 1.1 ± 0a | 0.4 ± 0b | 0.5 ± 0b | 0.3 ± 0 | 0.2 ± 0 | 0.2 ± 0 | |
| Gp7 | 0.5 ± 0a | 0.3 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0b | 0.2 ± 0 | 0.2 ± 0 | 0.2 ± 0 | |
| Gp13 | 0.1 ± 0a | 0 ± 0b | 0 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | |
| Gp14 | 0 ± 0a | 0.2 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0ab | 0.5 ± 0 | 0.5 ± 0 | 0.4 ± 0 | |
| Gp16 | 1.6 ± 0a | 1.4 ± 0a | 0.5 ± 0b | 0.8 ± 0a | 0.6 ± 0a | 0.3 ± 0b | |
| Granulicella | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.1 ± 0a | 0 ± 0a | 0.4 ± 1b | |
| Actinobacteria | Ilumatobacter | 0.4 ± 0a | 0.1 ± 0b | 0 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
| Blastococcus | 0.2 ± 0a | 0.5 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0a | 0.1 ± 0ab | 0.2 ± 0a | 0 ± 0b | |
| Arthrobacter | 1.1 ± 0 | 0.8 ± 0 | 0.9 ± 0 | 0.9 ± 1a | 1 ± 1a | 1.8 ± 0b | |
| Mycobacterium | 0 ± 0 | 0.1 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.3 ± 0a | 0.2 ± 0ab | 0.1 ± 0b | |
| Nocardioides | 0.9 ± 0 | 0.8 ± 0 | 0.8 ± 0 | 0.7 ± 0a | 0.6 ± 0a | 0.2 ± 0b | |
| Pseudonocardia | 0.2 ± 0 | 0.1 ± 0 | 0.1 ± 0 | 0.3 ± 0a | 0.1 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0b | |
| Streptomyces | 0.1 ± 0a | 0.6 ± 0b | 0.2 ± 0a | 0.2 ± 0a | 0.5 ± 0b | 0.2 ± 0a | |
| Bacteroidetes | Niastella | 0 ± 0a | 0.3 ± 0b | 0 ± 0a | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
| Mucilaginibacter | 0.1 ± 0a | 0.1 ± 0a | 0.3 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0a | 0 ± 0a | 0.5 ± 0b | |
| Firmicutes | Bacillus | 4.1 ± 1a | 5.1 ± 0b | 5.5 ± 0b | 11.1 ± 4a | 13.2 ± 3b | 7.6 ± 2c |
| Tuberibacillus | 0.2 ± 0a | 0 ± 0b | 0 ± 0b | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | |
| Brevibacillus | 0.1 ± 0a | 0.4 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0a | 0.1 ± 0 | 0.1 ± 0 | 0.1 ± 0 | |
| Paenibacillus | 1.4 ± 0a | 2.1 ± 0b | 1.6 ± 0a | 1.4 ± 0a | 2.5 ± 1b | 1.7 ± 1a | |
| Clostridium sensu stricto | 0.9 ± 0 | 0.9 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 2 ± 1a | 2.4 ± 1a | 0.7 ± 0b | |
| Clostridium XI | 0.6 ± 0a | 0.5 ± 0a | 1 ± 0b | 0.5 ± 0 | 0.6 ± 0 | 0.5 ± 0 | |
| Clostridium III | 0.3 ± 0 | 0.3 ± 0 | 0.5 ± 0 | 0.3 ± 0a | 0.3 ± 0a | 0.1 ± 0b | |
| Gemmatimonadetes | Gemmatimonas | 2.6 ± 0a | 4.1 ± 1b | 5.2 ± 1c | 1.7 ± 0 | 1.8 ± 1 | 1.7 ± 1 |
| Proteobacteria (Alpha) | Phenylobacterium | 0.4 ± 0a | 1.1 ± 0b | 0.6 ± 0c | 0.3 ± 0a | 0.6 ± 0b | 0.6 ± 0b |
| Devosia | 0.3 ± 0a | 0.2 ± 0a | 0.8 ± 0b | 0.3 ± 0a | 0.1 ± 0a | 0.8 ± 0b | |
| Microvirga | 0 ± 0a | 0.2 ± 0b | 1.3 ± 0c | 0 ± 0 | 0.1 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | |
| Mesorhizobium | 0.3 ± 0a | 0.1 ± 0b | 0.5 ± 0a | 0.1 ± 0ab | 0 ± 0a | 0.3 ± 0b | |
| Acidocella | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.6 ± 0a | 0.1 ± 0b | 0.9 ± 1a | |
| Sphingomonas | 1.7 ± 0a | 2.7 ± 0b | 1.8 ± 0a | 0.7 ± 1a | 2.6 ± 1b | 1.7 ± 0c | |
| Proteobacteria (Beta) | Burkholderia | 0.1 ± 0a | 0.6 ± 0b | 1.3 ± 0c | 0.5 ± 0 | 0.8 ± 0 | 0.8 ± 0 |
| Ramlibacter | 0 ± 0a | 0.2 ± 0b | 0.4 ± 0c | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.1 ± 0 | |
| Proteobacteria (Delta) | Geobacter | 0.2 ± 0a | 0 ± 0b | 0.2 ± 0a | 0.1 ± 0 | 0.1 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
| Proteobacteria (Gamma) | Methylobacter | 0.2 ± 0 | 0.1 ± 0 | 0.1 ± 0 | 0.2 ± 0a | 0.1 ± 0b | 0 ± 0b |
| Arenimonas | 0.1 ± 0a | 0 ± 0a | 0.6 ± 0b | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | |
| Dokdonella | 0.5 ± 0a | 0.2 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0b | 0.4 ± 0a | 0.1 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0b | |
| Dyella | 0.2 ± 0a | 0 ± 0b | 0.2 ± 0a | 0.2 ± 0 | 0.2 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | |
| Lysobacter | 0.2 ± 0a | 0.3 ± 0ab | 0.4 ± 0b | 0.1 ± 0ab | 0 ± 0a | 0.2 ± 0b | |
| Rhodanobacter | 0.2 ± 0a | 0.2 ± 0a | 1 ± 0b | 0.8 ± 1a | 0.8 ± 0a | 3.6 ± 1b | |
Selected were genera of a relative abundance of ≥0.1% and significantly different within the soil type. Average relative abundances ± SD, significant differences between treatments within soil type at genus level were indicated by different letters after Tukey test, p < 0.05 and n = 4. Significant increases in abundance compared to Con are highlighted in green, while significant decreases are highlighted in orange.