Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 20;13:45. doi: 10.1186/s12947-015-0039-y

Table 4.

Cumulative analysis of compliance (Anaesthetist compared with Cardiologist) in all assessed categories of the A-F scheme

All categories n = 2325 (100 %)
Concordant answers + Anaesth+ 108 (4.65 %)
Cardiol +
Concordant
Answers -
Anaesth - 2166 (93.2 %)
Cardiol -
Non-concordant Anaesth - 21 (0.9 %)
Cardiol +
Non-concordant Anaesth + 30 (1.3 %)
Cardiol -
Kappa 0.7974
P (McNemar) 0.2076
Sensitivity (Anaesthetist)
[95 % CI]
83.7 %
[76.4 – 89.1 %]
Specificity (Anaesthetist)
[95 % CI]
98.6 %
[98.0 – 99.0 %]
Positive predictive value (PPV)
[95 % CI]
78.3 %)
[70.7–84.3 %]
Negative predictive value (NPV)
[95 % CI]
99.0 %
[98.5–99.4 %]

1. Anaesth + (pathology pointed by anaesthetist); 2. Anaesth- (no pathology pointed by anaesthetist); 3. Cardiol + (pathology pointed by cardiologist); 4. Cardiol - (no pathology pointed by cardiologist)