Table 4.
Acceptability of the educational session
| How did you find each aspect of the session? | ||
|---|---|---|
| What was good about it? | How can it be improved? | |
| Presentation | - Clear 4/15a - Informative 7/15 - Concise 8/15 |
- Less rushed, more interactive 2/3 - Stimulating questions 1/3 |
| Video | - Visual 3/11 - Practical or demonstrative 5/11 - Clear 2/11 |
- Audio 6/7 - More time 1/7 |
| Simulation | - Hands on experience of usage 13/18 - Informative 2/18 - Demonstrated ease of use, increased confidence 3/18 |
- More time 2/6 - Practice 1/6 - Facilitators 1/6 - Sound 1/6 |
| Q & A discussion | - Opportunity to ask questions 4/6 - Collaborative 1/6 - Good/clear 2/6 |
- No major questions asked 2/5 - More time 1/5 - Naloxone for lay people and access for GPs 1/5 |
| Would any other educational interventions/activities help trainees? | ||
| • Booster sessions 1/9 • More simulations/real life situations 3/9 • More samples, syringes, differences between IN and exact-dose-dispenser 4/9 | ||
| Suggestions for improvement: | ||
| • Booster sessions 3/8 • More time 2/8 • Scenarios 1/8 • Very/good 2/8 | ||
aFractions indicate how many trainees reported about the particular item out of the total number of trainees who responded to the question