Table 3.

Association of demographic and personality/affective decision-making styles with discrepancies between decision making and cognition

	Unadjusted models						Fully adjusted models
	DM < COG			DM > COG			DM < COG			DM > COG
	OR	95 % wald confidence limits	p value	OR	95 % wald confidence limits	p value	OR	95 % wald Confidence Limits	p value	OR	95 % wald confidence limits	p value
Age	1.05	1.02–1.09	<0.01	1.03	0.99–1.07	0.10	1.05	1.02–1.09	0.01	1.03	0.99–1.07	0.08
Education	0.98	0.90–1.06	0.58	1.00	0.92–1.09	0.98	0.98	0.90–1.07	0.99	1.00	0.92–1.09	0.80
Male sex	0.66	0.35–1.25	0.20	2.63	1.56–4.43	<0.01	0.70	0.37–1.35	0.35	2.64	1.55–4.51	<0.01
Race (not white)	3.13	1.36–7.18	<0.01	2.11	0.79–5.66	0.14	2.74	1.17–6.43	0.01	2.07	0.76–5.65	0.18
Income	1.00	0.90–1.11	0.95	1.03	0.92–1.16	0.59	1.01	0.91–1.12	0.75	1.03	0.92–1.16	0.26
Depression	1.08	0.94–1.24	0.28	1.06	0.92–1.23	0.41	1.00	0.85–1.16	0.97	1.13	0.96–1.34	0.15
Impulsivity	1.03	0.98–1.08	0.30	0.97	0.92–1.03	0.28	1.04	0.98–1.10	0.22	0.98	0.92–1.04	0.56
Risk aversion (gamma)	2.11	1.03–4.33	0.04	0.67	0.29–1.59	0.37	1.28	0.58–2.85	0.34	0.75	0.30–1.88	0.66
Temporal discounting (alpha)	1.44	1.13–1.84	<0.01	1.13	0.84–1.51	0.42	1.19	0.90–1.56	0.14	1.17	0.84–1.62	0.33

Estimated from separate logistic regression models, unadjusted models were separate models for each variable, fully adjusted models included all other variables as covariate terms