Skip to main content
. 2015 May 14;33(12):1911–1920. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1560-1

Table 3.

Quality score criteria

Ref. no. Year External validity Internal validity Informativity
a b c d e f Sum g h i j k Sum l m n o p q r Sum Disagreement
[19] 2011 + + + 3 + + + + 4 + + + + + + 6 c, i, r
[10] 2011 + + + 3 + + + + 4 + + + + + + + 7 i, o, r
[20] 2013 + + + + + + 6 + + + + 4 + + + + + + + 7 d, h
[22] 2014 + + + + 4 + + + + 4 + + + + + + + 7 h
[23] 2012 + + + + + + 6 + + + + 4 + + + + + + 6 c, e
[21] 2014 + + + + + + 6 + + + + 4 + + + + + + + 6 r
[24] 2010 + + 2 + + 2 + + + + 4 j, o
Total 6 5 2 2 3 6 0 6 5 5 6 6 6 6 5 4 6 4
Mean 4.3 3.7 6.1

Items a–r refer to the quality score criteria listed in “Appendix 2