Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 22.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA. 2015 Jul 7;314(1):41–51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6968

Table 2.

Adjusted Changes in Global Cognitive Function over Time among All Participants: REGARDS Study, 2003 to 2013

Six-Item Screener Score (n=23,572) Incident Cognitive Impairment Six-Item Screener <5 (n=23,572)
No. of incident strokes 515 515
Model Model A Model B Model A Model B
Variable Coefficient (95% CI) P Coefficient (95% CI) P Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Odds Ratio (95% CI) P
Baseline cognitive score per 1 point increase 0.18 (0.16 – 0.19) <0.001 0.18 (0.16 –0.19) <0.001 0.53 (0.49 – 0.57) <0.001 0.53 (0.49 –0.57) <0.001
Baseline slope without incident stroke, per year 0.02 (0.02 – 0.02) <0.001 0.02 (0.02 –0.02) <0.001 0.88 (0.86 – 0.90) <0.001 0.88 (0.85 –0.90) <0.001
Acute change after incident stroke compared to before stroke −0.21 (−0.25 – −0.16) <0.001 −0.10 (−0.17 –−0.04) 0.001 1.98 (1.58 – 2.48) <0.001 1.32 (0.95 –1.83) 0.097
Change in slope after incident stroke, per year Not included −0.06 (−0.08 – −0.03) <0.001 Not included 1.23 (1.10 – 1.38) <0.001
Age, per year −0.02 (−0.02 – −0.01) <0.001 −0.02 (−0.02 –−0.01) <0.001 1.07 (1.07 – 1.08) <0.001 1.07 (1.07 – 1.08) <0.001
Intercept 5.3 (5.16 – 5.41) <0.001 5.28 (5.15 to 5.40) <0.001 NA NA
Log likelihood −113758.2 −113747.1 −25151.4 −25146.2

Interpretative Key: The Six-Item Screener (SIS) measures global cognition (scores range 0–6). Higher scores indicate better performance. The SIS was analyzed as a continuous measure and as a binary measure of incident cognitive impairment (SIS<5/impaired vs. ≥5/unimpaired).

Linear mixed-effects models included a random intercept, calendar time, and adjust for time-varying incident stroke, time since incident stroke, and baseline values of cognitive scores, age, sex, race, education, region, systolic blood pressure, cigarette smoking, waist circumference, diabetes, self-reported stroke, depressive symptoms, income, alcohol use, self-reported health status, and a random effect for slope. Generalized linear mixed-effects models for a binary outcome were used for estimating the odds of incident cognitive impairment.

Interpretative example for the SIS score as a continuous measure: An average participant had been gaining 0.02 points per year on the SIS of global cognition (95% confidence interval, 0.02–0.02; P<0.001) before having a stroke. An average stroke survivor’s SIS score decreased 0.10 points at the time of the stroke (95% confidence interval, 0.04–0.17; P=0.001). Over the years following stroke, survivors experienced a significant annual decrease in SIS scores. The average stroke survivor’s SIS score decreased 0.06 points per year compared to the baseline (prestroke) slope (95% confidence interval, 0.03–0.08; P<0.001).

Interpretative example for incident cognitive impairment as a binary measure (SIS<5/impaired vs. ≥5/unimpaired): The odds ratio is the odds of developing cognitive impairment compared to the odds of not developing cognitive impairment. Before stroke, participants experienced a significant annual decrease in the odds of developing cognitive impairment. The odds of participants developing cognitive impairment in a given prestroke year were 0.88 times lower than the odds of developing cognitive impairment during the previous year (odds ratio, 0.88 per year; 95% CI, 0.85–0.90; P<0.001). The risk of cognitive impairment acutely after stroke was not significantly different than the risk of cognitive impairment before stroke. The odds of developing cognitive impairment acutely after stroke were a non-significant 1.32 times greater than the odds of developing cognitive impairment immediately before stroke (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.95–1.83; P=0.097). However, stroke survivors experienced a significant annual increase in odds of developing cognitive impairment representing a significantly faster rate of incident cognitive impairment after stroke compared to the prestroke rate (odds ratio, 1.23 per year; 95% CI, 1.10–1.38; P<0.001), controlling for the odds of developing cognitive impairment before or acutely after the event. The odds of survivors developing cognitive impairment in a given poststroke year were 1.23 times greater than the odds of developing cognitive impairment during the previous year.