Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 22.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA. 2015 Jul 7;314(1):41–51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6968

Table 3.

Adjusted Changes in New Learning, Verbal Memory, and Executive Function over Time among All Participants: REGARDS Study, 2003 to 2013

Word-List Learning Score (n=10,321) Word-List Delayed Recall Score (n=10,053) Animal Fluency Test Score (n=11,214)
No. of incident strokes 107 102 120
Model Model A Model B Model A Model B Model A Model B
Variable Coefficient (95% CI)
P
Coefficient (95% CI)
P
Coefficient (95% CI)
P
Coefficient (95% CI)
P
Coefficient (95% CI)
P
Coefficient (95% CI)
P
Baseline cognitive score per 1 unit increase 0.41 (0.39 – 0.43)
<0.001
0.41 (0.39 – 0.43)
<0.001
0.34 (0.33 – 0.36)
<0.001
0.34 (0.33 – 0.36)
<0.001
0.54 (0.52 – 0.55)
<0.001
0.54 (0.52 – 0.55)
<0.001
Baseline slope without incident stroke, per year 0.22 (0.17 – 0.28)
<0.001
0.22 (0.17 – 0.28)
<0.001
0.08 (0.06 – 0.10)
<0.001
0.08 (0.06 – 0.10)
<0.001
−0.31 (−0.35 – −0.27)
<0.001
−0.31 (−0.35 – −0.27)
<0.001
Acute change after incident stroke compared to before stroke −1.75 (−2.45 – −1.05)
<0.001
−1.80 (−2.86 – −0.73)
0.001
−0.67 (−0.97 – −0.37)
<0.001
−0.60 (−1.07 – −0.13)
0.012
−0.90 (−1.57 – −0.23)
0.009
0.15 (−0.94 – 1.24)
0.78
Change in slope after incident stroke, per year Not included 0.03 (−0.45 – 0.51)
0.91
Not included −0.04 (−0.25 – 0.17)
0.70
Not included −0.63 (−1.15 – −0.12)
0.017
Age, per year −0.14 (−0.15 – −0.13)
<0.001
−0.14 (−0.15 – −0.13)
<0.001
−0.06 (−0.06 – −0.06)
<0.001
−0.06 (−0.06 – −0.06)
<0.001
−0.12 (−0.13 – −0.11)
<0.001
−0.12 (−0.13 – −0.11)
<0.001
Intercept 18.17 (17.06 – 19.28)
<0.001
18.17 (17.06 – 19.29)
<0.001
7.91 (7.45 – 8.38)
<0.001
7.91 (7.45 – 8.38)
<0.001
16.58 (15.52 – 17.65)
<0.001
16.57 (15.50 to 17.63)
<0.001
Log likelihood −41683.4 −41683.3 −27920.2 −27920.1 −44213.4 −44210.5

Interpretative Key: The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease Word-List Learning assesses new learning (scores range 0–30), the Word-List Delayed Recall assesses verbal memory (scores range 0–10), and the Animal Fluency Test assesses executive function with scores representing number of animals generated in 1 minute. For all cognitive tests, higher scores indicate better performance.

Linear mixed-effects models (Model B) included a random intercept, calendar time, and adjust for time-varying incident stroke, time since incident stroke, and baseline values of cognitive scores, age, sex, race, race*time (for Word-List Learning and Word-List Delayed Recall only), education, region, systolic blood pressure, cigarette smoking, waist circumference, diabetes, self-reported stroke, depressive symptoms, income, alcohol use, and self-reported health status.

Interpretative Example: An average participant gained 0.22 points per year on the Word-List Learning (WLL) test of new learning (95% confidence interval, 0.17–0.28; P<0.001) before having a stroke. An average stroke survivor’s WLL score decreased 1.80 points at the time of the stroke (95% confidence interval, 0.73–2.86; P=0.001). Over the years following stroke, survivors experienced no significant annual change in WLL scores (point estimate, 0.03 points; 95% confidence interval, −0.45–0.51; P=0.91) compared to the baseline (prestroke) slope.