Table 3.
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test correlates with ICR more strongly in adults and is driven by AUDIT consumption subscale.
| AUDIT total | AUDIT consumption | AUDIT dependence/harm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18–24 | r(184) = 0.014 | r(166) = 0.018 | r(166) = 0.017 |
| (n = 184) | p = 0.42 | p = 0.41 | p = 0.41 |
| β = 0.001 | β = 0.003 | β = 0.002 | |
| 26–40 | r(37) = 0.30 | r(36) = 0.398 | r(36) = 0.24 |
| (n = 39) | p = 0.032 | p = 0.007 | p = 0.073 |
| β = 0.04 | β = 0.117 | β = 0.048 | |
Table reflects Pearson correlation r, p, and β values from linear regression analyses of AUDIT score and AUDIT subscales score effects on ICR by recruited age groups and age groups proposed for further analysis of age effect. BOLD: survives Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (p < 0.0083).