Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 9;2016:7292564. doi: 10.1155/2016/7292564

Table 1.

In this table, from left to right, the following columns are reported: the number of patients, mean age of study population (in case of more than one group of patients, more mean ages are reported and compared), diabetes (diabetic diseases, yes or no), D. patients (number of diabetic patients), insulin therapy (insulin therapy, yes or no), and references, in alphabetic order with first name of authors and assigned numbers. The symbol — is used in case of information not found in the reference studies.

Number of patients Mean age Diabetes D. patients Insulin therapy References
170 59 ± 9 versus 76 ± 4 Bleeker et al. [13]
813 66.4 Yes 207 Yes Cleland et al. (CARE-HF trial) [12]
355 64 ± 7 versus 62 ± 10 Yes 141 Yes Fantoni et al. [19]
330 83.7 ± 2.6 versus 66.9 ± 9.5 Foley et al. [16]
1787 <65 versus 65–74 versus ≥75 Yes 26 (5%) versus 55 versus (7%) 27 (6%) Yes Fumagalli et al. [15]
552 67 ± 9 versus 63 ± 10 Yes 552 Yes George et al. [20]
813 Yes 207 Yes Hoppe et al. [21]
447 65.4 ± 10.2 versus 66.6 ± 7.5 Yes 91 Yes Mangiavacchi et al. [22]
1820 65 Yes 552 Yes Martin et al. (MADIT-CRT) [11]
1500 66 ± 14 Yes 481 Ruwald et al. (MADIT-RIT) [23]
610 61.8 ± 11.6 versus 62.9 ± 10.6 Yes 46 versus 91 Gold et al. (REVERSE) [10]
3327 <70 versus >70 Pulignano et al. [14]
72 81.4 ± 5.8 versus 82.5 ± 6.9 Yes 32 Yes Sardu et al. [24]